Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fit testing

The chi-square distribution can be applied to other types of apph-catlon which are of an entirely different nature. These include apph-cations which are discussed under Goodness-of-Fit Test and Two-Way Test for Independence of Count Data. In these applications, the mathematical formulation and context are entirely different, but they do result in the same table of values. [Pg.493]

The value of the eorrelation eoeffieient using the least squares teehnique and the use of goodness-of-fit tests (in the non-linear domain) together probably provide the means to determine whieh distribution is the most appropriate (Keeeeioglu, 1991). However, a more intuitive assessment about the nature of the data must also be made when seleeting the eorreet type of distribution, for example when there is likely to be a zero threshold. [Pg.144]

Medically evaluating, training, qualifying, and fit-testing workers for specific respirator types, checking 29 CFR 1910, Subpart Z, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, for any special respiratory protection requirements (e.g., for asbestos, lead, or cadmium) [3]... [Pg.123]

No matter what type of respirator is used, it is of the utmost importance that the revised respiratory standard is adhered to. The revised standard stresses training, documentation, written programs, medical surveillance, fit testing, and a variety of other subjects pertinent to respirators. Of particular interest to the authors is the new approach toward action levels, protection factors, and fit testing. Another important change is OSHAs latest approach on voluntary respirator use. With the new standard in effect, those workers previously considered to be voluntarily wearing respirators should be much better protected. [Pg.137]

Fit test A method for evaluating how well a respirator seals against the wearer s face. OSHA requires that a respirator be found to have a satisfactory fit before it can be used. [Pg.1441]

As regards the x-ray data, the conclusion in the text was reached by applying the chi-square goodness-of-fit test. See C. A. Bennett and N. L. Franklin, Statistical Analysis, page 620, for details of the test. [Pg.274]

Numerical solutions of such problems cause some difficulties during the course of many methods in connection with nonlinearity and tendency to infinity of the partial derivatives at the front of the temperature way. It is hoped that the exact solutions obtained in such a way help motivate what is done and could serve in practical implementations as goodness-of-fit tests. [Pg.516]

Two issues present themselves when the question of PB-PK model validation is raised. The first issue is the accuracy with which the model predicts actual drug concentrations. The actual concentration-time data have most likely been used to estimate certain total parameters. Quantitative assessment, via goodness-of-fit tests, should be done to assess the accuracy of the model predictions. Too often, model acceptance is based on subjective evaluation of graphical comparisons of observed and predicted concentration values. [Pg.97]

Goodness-of-fit tests may be a simple calculation of the sum of squared residuals for each organ in the model [26] or calculation of a log likelihood function [60], In the former case,... [Pg.97]

Frequency domain performance has been analyzed with goodness-of-fit tests such as the Chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. The studies by Young and Alward (14) and Hartigan et. al. (J 3) demonstrate the use of these tests for pesticide runoff and large-scale river basin modeling efforts, respectively, in conjunction with the paired-data tests. James and Burges ( 1 6 ) discuss the use of the above statistics and some additional tests in both the calibration and verification phases of model validation. They also discuss methods of data analysis for detection of errors this last topic needs additional research in order to consider uncertainties in the data which provide both the model input and the output to which model predictions are compared. [Pg.169]

The existence of a normal distribution can only be confirmed by a goodness-of-fit test (e.g., yf, according to Kolmogoroff [1941] and Smirnoff [1948]). [Pg.106]

Respirators can be used improperly and/or can be damaged to the extent that they do not provide the needed protection. OSHA and NIOSH have developed standards for using respirators,13 including fit testing (to ensure that the device does not leak excessively), periodic in-... [Pg.96]

These type of respirators reduce the user s exposure by a factor of 50 if the user has been properly fit tested. [Pg.104]

By using only simple hand calculations, the single-site model has been rejected and the dual-site model has been shown to represent adequately both the initial-rate and the high-conversion data. No replicate runs were available to allow a lack-of-fit test. In fact this entire analysis has been conducted using only 18 conversion-space-time points. Additional discussion of the method and parameter estimates for the proposed dual-site model are presented elsewhere (K5). Note that we have obtained the same result as available through the use of nonintrinsic parameters. [Pg.147]

However, this particular experimental design only covered values of x3 up to 1.68 consequently, the saddle point is only predicted by the model and not exhibited by the data. This is the reason the lack-of-fit tests of Section IV indicated neither model 3 nor model 4 of Table XVI could be rejected as inadequately representing the data. As is apparent, additional data must be taken in the vicinity of the stationary point to confirm this predicted nature of the surface and hence to allow rejection of certain models. This region of experimentation (or beyond) is also required by the parameter estimation and model discrimination designs of Section VII. [Pg.157]

Figure 30 portrays the grid of values of the independent variables over which values of D were calculated to choose experimental points after the initial nine. The additional five points chosen are also shown in Fig. 30. Note that points at high hydrogen and low propylene partial pressures are required. Figure 31 shows the posterior probabilities associated with each model. The acceptability of model 2 declines rapidly as data are taken according to the model-discrimination design. If, in addition, model 2 cannot pass standard lack-of-fit tests, residual plots, and other tests of model adequacy, then it should be rejected. Similarly, model 1 should be shown to remain adequate after these tests. Many more data points than these 14 have shown less conclusive results, when this procedure is not used for this experimental system. Figure 30 portrays the grid of values of the independent variables over which values of D were calculated to choose experimental points after the initial nine. The additional five points chosen are also shown in Fig. 30. Note that points at high hydrogen and low propylene partial pressures are required. Figure 31 shows the posterior probabilities associated with each model. The acceptability of model 2 declines rapidly as data are taken according to the model-discrimination design. If, in addition, model 2 cannot pass standard lack-of-fit tests, residual plots, and other tests of model adequacy, then it should be rejected. Similarly, model 1 should be shown to remain adequate after these tests. Many more data points than these 14 have shown less conclusive results, when this procedure is not used for this experimental system.
ISO 8796 2004 Polyethylene PE 32 and PE 40 pipes for irrigation laterals - Susceptibility to environmental stress cracking induced by insert-type fittings - Test method and requirements ISO 9625 1993 Mechanical joint fittings for use with polyethylene pressure pipes for irrigation purposes... [Pg.236]

The main problem in plotting occurs in deciding where the line should be placed when there is point scatter. A secondary problem happens when the data has curvature and a curved line is needed to describe the points. While the human mind can sense relationships in plotting pretty well, there is difficulty in estimating the proper plot position for these reasons. While two of the data sets, A and F, are linear, corresponding to the lack fit test at 95% probability, all of the sets show curvature in log-log and rectangular coordinates. [Pg.186]


See other pages where Fit testing is mentioned: [Pg.96]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.774]    [Pg.880]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.900]    [Pg.903]    [Pg.903]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.236]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.197 ]




SEARCH



Best Practices in Novel Biomarker Assay Fit-for-Purpose Testing

Comfort testing and fit analysis of military textiles

Corrosion tests curve fitting

Curve Fitting and Regression Modeling vs Hypothesis Testing

Diagnostic tests of the fitted model. Residual plots

Fit test

Fitness testing

Fitness testing minimization

Goodness of fit testing

Goodness-of-fit tests

Lack of fit, test

Parameter Fitting via Target Testing

Principle 2 Analytical Measurements Should Be Made Using Methods and Equipment That Have Been Tested to Ensure They Are Fit for Purpose

Qualitative fit test

Quantitative fit test

Respirators fit testing

Respiratory protection respirator fit testing

Statistical test, for the lack of fit

Test for lack of fit

Time-Domain Eyeball Fitting of Step Test Data

Types of Fit Tests

© 2024 chempedia.info