First-generation pesticides

The speed with which adaptations appear, such as, for example, resistance to pesticides, depends on the pressure of selection. When using pesticides, the pressure is practically 100% and, therefore, new characteristics appear very rapidly, in just 2-3 generations. The speed with which resistance appears depends also on the population size of the target species the larger the population, the more probable that resistance will appear in some members of the first generation. The populations of target species are always large otherwise there would be no reason to try to suppress them. Therefore, in each suppressed population, there will inevitably be more resistant individuals. 

In natural circumstances, at least one individual in 10,000 carries an unusual mutation, which, if fixed by selection, may turn into a new characteristic. Insensitivity to a chemical substance that has not been seen over millions of years of evolution is a rare characteristic, and the frequency of such mutations is not 104, but closer to 107 or even 109. If there are over one billion individuals in the population of the target species, then less sensitive members will always be present in the first generation. They will survive, and will have progeny. Three to four generations later, the population of the target species will be the same size as, or even larger than, it was before pesticide use however, the majority of individuals will be less sensitive to the pesticide. 

Nimmo, D.R., T.L. Hamaker, E. Matthews, and J.C. Moore. 1981. An overview of the acute and chronic effects of first and second generation pesticides on an estuarine mysid. Pages 3-19 in J. Vernberg, A. Calabrese, F.P. Thurberg, and W.B. Vernberg (eds.). Biological Monitoring of Marine Pollutants. Academic Press, New York. 

As reviewed by Ujvary some of the earliest natural product-based pesticides were those for the elimination of vertebrate pests. For example, strychnine (Fig. 19), obtained from seeds of Strychnos nux-vomica, is a rodenticide that is an antagonist to the neurotransmitter glycine and is used against a few mammal species, as well as pest birds and fish. The first generation of anticoagulant rodenticides were based on dicoumarin. 

Approaches for aggregating exposure for simple scenarios have been proposed in the literature (Shurdut et al., 1998 Zartarian et al., 2000). The USEPA s National Exposure Research Laboratory has developed the Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation (SHEDS) model for pesticides, which can be characterized as a first-generation aggregation model and the developers conclude that to refine and evaluate the model for use as a regulatory decision-making tool for residential scenarios, more robust data sets are needed for human activity patterns, surface residues for the most relevant snrface types, and cohort-specific exposure factors (Zartarian et al, 2000). The SHEDS framework was used by the USEPA to conduct a probabilistic exposure assessment for the specific exposure scenario of children contacting chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated playsets and decks (Zartarian et al, 2003). 

Aerosol products are hermetically sealed, ensuring that the contents caimot leak, spill, or be contaminated. The packages can be considered to be tamper-proof. They deUver the product in an efficient manner generating Httie waste, often to sites of difficult access. By control of particle size, spray pattern, and volume deUvered per second, the product can be appHed directiy without contact by the user. For example, use of aerosol pesticides can minimize user exposure and aerosol first-aid products can soothe without applying painful pressure to a wound. Spray contact lens solutions can be appHed directiy and aerosol lubricants (qv) can be used on machinery in operation. Some preparations, such as stable foams, can only be packaged as aerosols. 

Because of the small number of laboratories involved, validation of UK methods by inter-laboratory study has become impractical in most cases. Even where it is practical, it is usually impossible to validate all pesticide-matrix combinations. Moreover, single-laboratory validation data will have to be generated. Therefore, the CSL guidelines are one of the first that strictly focus on requirements of single-laboratory validation. Some examples of minimum requirements are given in Table 8. Additionally, these guidelines emphasize some other important aspects of validation and contain some new ideas. 

There are two types of handlers of universal waste. The first type of handler is a person who generates, or creates, universal waste. For example, this may include a person who uses batteries, pesticides, thermostats, or lamps and who eventually decides that they are no longer usable. The second type of handler is a person who receives universal waste from other handlers, accumulates the waste, and then sends it on to other handlers, recyclers, or treatment or disposal facilities without performing the actual treatment, recycling, or disposal. This may include a person who collects batteries, pesticides, or thermostats from small businesses and sends the wastes to a recycling facility. The universal waste handler requirements depend on how much universal waste a handler accumulates at any one time. 

As an example of incinerator use in the pesticide industry, one plant operates two incinerators to dispose of wastewater from six pesticide products [7]. They are rated at heat release capacities of 35 and 70 milhon Btu/hour and were designed to dispose of two different wastes. The first primary feed stream consists of approximately 95% organics and 5% water. The second stream consists of approximately 5% organics and 95% water. The energy generated in burning the primary stream is anticipated to vaporize all water in the secondary stream and to oxidize all the organics present. Wastes from two of the six pesticide processes use 0.55% and 4.68% of the incinerator capacity, respectively. The volume of the combined pesticide... 

---