Fault Tree Analysis developement

Fault Tree Analysis. Fault trees represent a deductive approach to determining the causes contributing to a designated failure. The approach begins with the definition of a top or undesired event, and branches backward through intermediate events until the top event is defined in terms of basic events. A basic event is an event for which further development would not be useful for the purpose at hand. For example, for a quantitative fault tree, if a frequency or probabiUty for a failure can be deterrnined without further development of the failure logic, then there is no point to further development, and the event is regarded as basic. 

A flooding analysis for major plant systems uses a qualitative fault tree that takes into account the elevation of system components. This procedure, illustrated in Figure 5.3-1, uses a fault tree captioned for the top event, "core melt due to internal flood." The fault tree is developed under the assumption that a flood causes a transient, small, or large LOCA, or causes the failure of... 

Dr. Howard Lambert of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and FT A Associates, 3728 Brunell Dr., Oakland CA, 94602, e-mail lambert8 llnl.gov, provided the public domain codes FTAP (fault tree analysis program) and companions. He authored some of the codes, was associated with their development, teaches and consults for PSA. 

Fault tree analysis of mitigating systems to develop logic models of how system failure may occur ... 

Fault Tree Analysis Report for CoaF Coal Gasitication Failure rales (per year basts) for over 400 events Coal-gasification Process Development unit 50. 

Fault Tree Analysis Report for Coal-Gasification Process-Development... 

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) A method for logical development of the many contributing failures that might result in an incident. 

The disciplines of engineering and quality control have long recognized the principles of root cause analysis. Some process safety tools for root cause analysis have been borrowed from these disciplines. For example, fault tree analysis was developed as an engineering tool, but its logic tree structure has been adapted to meet process safety requirements. 

Hazard and risk analysis is a vast subject by itself and is extensively covered in the literature [22]. In order to plan to avoid accidental hazards, the hazard potential must be evaluated. Many new methods and techniques have been developed to assess and evaluate potential hazards, employing chemical technology and reliability engineering. These can be deduced from Fault Tree Analysis or Failure Mode Analysis [23], In these techniques, the plant and process hazard potentials are foreseen and rectified as far as possible. Some techniques such as Hazards and operability (HAZOP) studies and Hazard Analysis (HAZAN) have recently been developed to deal with the assessment of hazard potentials [24]. It must be borne in mind that HAZOP and HAZAN studies should be properly viewed not as ends in themselves but as valuable contributors to the overall task of risk management... 

Rohm and Haas uses Multiple-Cause, Systems-Oriented Incident Investigation techniques (MCSOII), or mac-soy. It is a direct adaptation of the Fault Tree Analysis logic and the Deming Principles of Systems and Quality. [10] The method was developed to improve the overall quality of investigations, to increase the uniformity of investigation made by various teams, and improve the usefulness of the proposed corrective actions. The quality of the mac-soy or MCSOII investigation is improved because the method [10]... 

Fault tree analysis is many times requested because of complex hazards identified by a HAZOP review. Engineering has some people trained in analytical tree development and analysis and they are responsible for conducting these type studies. 

This approach is illustrated by the development of event trees and fault tree analysis. In fault tree analysis, the probability of an accident is estimated by considering the probabihty of human errors, component failures, and other events. This approach has been extensively applied in the field of risk analysis (Gertman and Blackman 1994). THERP (Swain and Guttman 1983) extends the conditioning approach to the evaluation of human reliability in complex systems. 

Simplified equations and fault tree analysis will be used to determine the PFDavg of the SIF shown in Figure 13-3. One advantage in using the fault tree approach for the PFDavg calculation for this SIF is that most engineering personnel are familiar with the development and analysis of fault trees. This enables them to better understand the operation of complex safety instrumented functions by reviewing its associated fault tree. 

Validating the Development Assurance Level Fault Tree Analysis... 

Development Assurance Level Fault Tree Analysis for loss of primary barometric altitude display (annunciated)... 

---