Development assurance levels

Required Functional Development Assurance Level FDALE FDALD FDALC FDALB FDAL A... 

E ve Development Assurance Level B. Conduct FTA ( 4.1.1.a.2) to allocate IDAL and FDAL... 

Any sufficiently complex system is subject to failure as a result of one or more subsystems or components failing. The aim of the FTA is to use deductive logic to understand all the underlying causes of a particular failure in a sufficiently complex system so that the likelihood of failure can be reduced through improved system design (i.e. different component selection, more stringent development assurance levels and/or via system architectural improvements). 

Allocate the Development Assurance Level (DAL) to determine the rigour necessary when demonstrating compliance using RTCA/DO-178, RTCA/DO-254 and SAE ARP4754A. 

Validating the Development Assurance Level Fault Tree Analysis... 

Development Assurance Level Fault Tree Analysis for loss of primary barometric altitude display (annunciated)... 

The aim of this chapter is to describe the purpose and role of Development Assurance and to outline the general approach to satisfy the allocated Functional Development Assurance Level (FDAL) or Item Development Assurance Level (IDAL). 

Objective Applicability by Development Assurance Level Output/associated evidence Control category ... 

ANM-03-117-09, January 14, 2004. Policy Statement on Guidance for Determination of System, Hardware, and Software Development Assurance Levels on Transport Category Airplanes. FAA Memorandum. 

The factors that distinguish hardware DALs are the level of independence required for Levels A and B, which is not required for Levels C and D (as specified by the Applicability by Development Assurance-Level columns), and the degree of control... 

The mechanism used to separate portions of a system or item with sufficient independence such that a specific development assurance level can be substantiated within the partitioned item [ARP4754A],... 

Chapter 9 addresses the systematic causes of failures or unanticipated system behaviours and provides guidance on Development Assurance Levels (DALs) to the Safety Assessor who may not be expert in the fields of software(SAV) or complex hardware (HAV). 

A Service Assurance Level (SAL) concept may be useful when all or part of the safety mitigation required to produce a sufficiently safe service is placed within the service operation itself, rather than within the software or systems (as is usual with a Development Assurance Level or Safety Integrity Level (SIL)). 

The design of aeronautics safety critical systems deals with two families of faults random faults of equipments and systematic faults in the development of the equipment, which include errors in the specification, design and coding of hardware and software. Two different approaches are used when assessing whether the risk associated with these two types of faults is acceptable. Qualitative requirements (minimal number of failures leading to a Failure Condition) and quantitative requirements (maximal probability of a Failure Condition occurrence) are associated with equipment faults whereas requirements stated in terms of Development Assurance Levels (DAL) are associated with development faults. 

Bieber, P., Dehnas, R., Seguin, C. DALculus theory and tool for development assurance level allocation. In Flammini, F., Bologna, S., Vittorini, V. (eds.) SAFE-COMP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6894, pp. 43 56. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)... 

See Development Assurance Level (DAL) and Software Level (SL) for additional related information. 

TABLE 2.3 Hardware Design Assurance Level Definitions and Their Relationships to Systems Development Assurance Level... 

Failure Condition Classification System Development Assurance Level... 

The system development assurance level is assigned based on the most severe failure condition classification associated with the applicable aircraft-level function(s), shown in Table 2.4. This table departs slightly from Advisory Circular (AC) 25.1309-1 A and Advisory Material Joint (AMJ) 25.1309 by estabhshing level E as no safety effect. ... 

The Development Assurance Level of an aircraft function depends on the severity of the effects of failures or development errors of that function on the aircraft, crew, or occupants. The Development Assurance Level of each item depends on both the system architecture and the resulting failure effects of the item on the functions performed by the system. DO-178 procedures should be used to verify that the software implementation meets the required DALs. The hardware DALs are verified via procedures that are to be defined by RTCA DO-254. 

Relationships to Systems Development Assurance Level 98 Table 2.4 System DAL Assignment 105 Table 2.5 Probable Effects of Shock 111 Table 2.6 Suitable Protection Measures 112 Table 2.7 Radio Frequency Bands 117... 

---