Exposure toxicity assessment

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... 

Cliapter 10 Healdi Hazard Idendfication Cliapter 11 Dose-respoiise/Toxicity Assessment Cliapter 12 Exposure Assessment Cliapter 13 Risk Analysis and Characterizadon... 

With respect to sampling, sufficient numbers of environmental samples should be obtained to permit reliable statistical and biologic Interpretation of results. At the same time, the samples collected should be from environmental locations where human exposure Is most likely to occur (or did occur. If questions of past exposures require assessment). They should also be targeted for those environmental media which can be expected to have the greatest potential for human exposure and absorption. Finally, the samples must be obtained and preserved so that the chemicals which pose the greatest threat for human health In terms of toxicity and tissue persistence can be accurately measured. 

Barrows M.E., Petrocelli, S.R., Macek, K.J., Carroll, J.J. (1980) Bioconcentration and elimination of selected water pollutants by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). In Dynamic, Exposure, Hazard Assessment of Toxic Chemicals. Haque, R. Editor. Ann Arbor Press, pp. 379-392, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 

One-generation reproduction exposure To assess the potential reproductive and developmental toxicity in males and females hy the intended route of exposure... 

It is not possible to achieve "adequate control" of the risks of persistent, bioaccumulative chemicals. The fact that traditional risk assessment cannot reasonably be applied to such chemicals, and that a revised PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic) assessment is necessary, is explicitly recognised in the EU s Technical Guidance Document for risk assessment. Their intrinsic properties mean that there is a high risk of exposure at sometime during the lifecycle of the chemical or the article that contains it. Even small releases, if they are continuous, can result in significant exposures. This is why we see significant and, in some cases, escalating levels of brominated flame retardants, nonylphenols and other persistent chemicals in breast milk, umbilical cord blood and human tissue. 

In the past few years the use of rotifers in ecotoxicological studies has substantially increased. The main endpoints used are mortality, reproduction, behavior, cellular biomarkers, mesocosms, and species diversity in natural populations [126]. Several workers have used Brachionus calyciflorus for various types of toxicity assessments. Thus, comprehensive evaluation of approximately 400 environmental samples for the toxicity assessment of solid waste elutriates, monitoring wells, effluents, sediment pore water, and sewage sludge was carried out by Persoone and Janssen [127]. The mortality of rotifers hatched from cysts is evaluated after 24 hours exposure. This microbiotest has been commercialized in a Rotoxkit F [128,129]. 

As discussed above, the risk of chemicals in the environment is dependent on both exposure and toxicity. Pathways through which organisms in the environment are exposed to chemicals are therefore key determinants of how safe (and therefore, how green ) a chemical is, and must be considered in moving towards a reduced risk or hazard approach to the production and use of chemicals. Fate in the environment is the principal determinant of exposure and designing chemicals for reduced hazard and risk to the environment involves consideration of processes that affect the chemical in the environment, in addition to toxicity. Assessment of environmental fate, including design of chemicals for nonpersistence, is discussed in detail in Chapter 16. 

Toxicity assessment is the determination of the potential of any substance to act as a poison, the conditions under which this potential will be realized, and the characterization of its action. Risk assessment, however, is a quantitative assessment of the probability of deleterious effects under given exposure conditions. Both are involved in the regulation of toxic chemicals. Regulation is the control, by statute, of the manufacture, transportation, sale, or disposal of chemicals deemed to be toxic after testing procedures or according to criteria laid down in applicable laws. 

The risk assessment process involves describing the toxicological hazard profile of a chemical substance, using qualitative and quantitative data, and coupling this to an estimate of exposure to assess any risk. Consequently, the information that is required on packaging chemicals comprises (a) toxicity data and, (b) exposure data. 

During exposure to contaminated sediments, test organisms can concentrate chemicals in their tissue and exhibit measurable (sub)lethal effects linked to accumulated substances. In the field of sediment toxicity assessment, it is noteworthy to mention that some studies have been conducted to characterize both exposure and biological effects in parallel. Exposure to contaminants can be gauged by measuring their concentrations in water/sediment and tissue, and effects can be estimated with endpoints such as survival and growth. These studies are important, for example, to detect threshold concentrations at which chemicals begin to exert adverse effects. As such, they can be useful to recommend effective chemical quality standards that will be protective of aquatic life. 

The first study was designed to assess the suitability of various microscale bioassays and recommend an appropriate testing strategy for sediment toxicity assessment (Cote et al., 1998a,b). The recommended test batteries included seven micro-scale laboratory assays conducted on bacteria (Vibrio fischeri), cnidarians (Hydra attenuata), micro-crustaceans (Thamnocephalus platyurus), and benthic macroinvertebrates (Hyalella azteca and Chironomus riparius), and involved two phases of exposure (pore water and whole sediment). A total of 16 stations were included in the toxicity assessment scheme. 

It sets out a priority-based ranking scheme for compounds according to level of health concern based on extent of human exposure and assessed or presumptive toxicological effects. In the absence of actual test data, presumptive toxicity also can be anticipated from chemical structure-activity relationships or from the nature of the substance and the known biological activity of substances of the same or similar structural class. This information can provide guidance on how much toxicology testing should be done for certain levels of human exposure. 

Long before Bt crops were developed, Bt toxins in sprayable formulations were used to control insects. This fact allowed the EPA and FDA to consider twenty years of human exposure in assessing human safety before agreeing to register Bt corn for commercial use. In addition to these data, numerous toxicity and allergenicity tests were conducted on many different kinds of naturally occurring Bt toxins. Based on these tests and the history of Bt use on food crops, it was concluded that Bt corn is as safe as its conventional counterpart and therefore would not adversely effect human and animal health or the environment (Opinion on..., EFSA 2004). 

The need for reproductive and developmental toxicity studies is dependent on the product, the clinical indication, and the intended patient population [50,52], Consideration is based on the nature of any expressed products and/or inappropriate biodistribution. Effects to the reproductive system that were identified in exposure and general toxicity assessments that suggest a cause for concern must be addressed in these more specific studies. If studies are necessary, study designs will likely need to be altered to accommodate selection of relevant animal model, dose selection, and dosing frequency. 

Research is needed to assess if it is possible to extend integrated models that link exposure-toxicity (like the BLM) for use with mixtures. 

---