Experimental methods, classification

Calorimetry is the basic experimental method employed in thennochemistry and thennal physics which enables the measurement of the difference in the energy U or enthalpy //of a system as a result of some process being done on the system. The instrument that is used to measure this energy or enthalpy difference (At/ or AH) is called a calorimeter. In the first section the relationships between the thennodynamic fiinctions and calorunetry are established. The second section gives a general classification of calorimeters in tenns of the principle of operation. The third section describes selected calorimeters used to measure thennodynamic properties such as heat capacity, enthalpies of phase change, reaction, solution and adsorption. 

This account of the kinetics of reactions between (inorganic) solids commences with a consideration of the reactant mixture (Sect. 1), since composition, particle sizes, method of mixing and other pretreatments exert important influences on rate characteristics. Some comments on experimental methods are included here. Section 2 is concerned with reaction mechanisms formulated to account for observed behaviour, including references to rate processes which involve diffusion across a barrier layer. This section also includes a consideration of the application of mechanistic criteria to the classification of the kinetic characteristics of solid-solid reactions. Section 3 surveys rate processes identified as the decomposition of a solid catalyzed by a solid. Section 4 reviews other types of solid + solid reactions, which may be conveniently subdivided further into the classes... 

Boyles contributions to chemistry were numerous and significant. He advanced chemical classification a long way, and his category of neutral substances was valuable for an understanding of the chemistry of salts. Making chemistry a respectable part of natural philosophy was of great importance. The experimental method that Boyle devised, with its emphasis on evidence, repeatability, public verification, quantification, and the use of pure materials, was of even greater importance. His mechanical explanations, however, were ultimately sterile. 

Usually experimental methods are used to measure heat transfer. Basic transfer mechanisms commonly recognized are conduction and radiation. Convection is often used as a third classification. The convection classification is also used in the current work. 

Although this distinction is fundamental, it does not lead to the most convenient classification. It has been usual to classify experimental methods according to the means of supplying the energy. The main methods are briefly characterized here, and discussed in detail in the following three chapters. References to the literature are given in these chapters here only general principles are stated, except in Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.7, where the methods are of such limited application that no further discussion is required. 

A9.5.1.3 Data on bioconcentration properties of a substance may be available from standardized tests or may be estimated from the structure of the molecule. The interpretation of such bioconcentration data for classification purposes often requires detailed evaluation of test data. In order to facilitate this evaluation two additional appendixes are enclosed. These appendixes describe available methods (Appendix III of Annex 9) and factors influencing the bioconcentration potential (Appendix IV of Annex 9). Finally, a list of standardized experimental methods for determination of bioconcentration and Kow are attached (Appendix V of Annex 9) together with a list of references (Appendix VI of Annex 9). 

With this classification of the activity-determining factors in mind, it will be possible to evaluate the general abilities and limitations of some of the standard experimental methods namely, the static system and the flow-type catalytic reactors used for activity determinations. 

In this section we focus on the three main types of ideal reactors BR, CSTR, and PFR. Laboratory data are usually in the form of concentrations or partial pressures versus batch time (batch reactors), concentrations or partial pressures versus distance from reactor inlet or residence time (PFR), or rates versus residence time (CSTR). Rates can also be calculated from batch and PFR data by differentiating the concentration versus time or distance data, usually by numerical curve fitting first. It follows that a general classification of experimental methods is based on whether the data measure rates directly (differential or direct method) or indirectly (integral of indirect method). Table 7-13 shows the pros and cons of these methods. 

The experimental methods used in the study of atomic states are only infrequently of direct use in nuclear physics owing to the different scale of energies involved, but the general collision theory developed to describe the bombardment of atoms by electrons is of basic importance in nuclear dynamics. The classification of such collision processes into elastic and inelastic types is also directly relevant. Since however the apparatus of nuclear physics is generally more complex and often different in conception from the equipment used in atomic spectroscopy, and since it often influences very markedly the type of information which may be sought, the proper appreciation of experimental results demands an account of the methods by which they have been obtained. This is given in this article in Part C. 

A classification scheme for laser-microwave spectroscopy based on well-defined three-step processes is displayed in Figure 5. It illustrates the great variety of possible experimental methods. The steps can be carried out in many different ways depending, for example, on the physical properties of the species under study. To be more specific, details of the three steps are as follows ... 

Some other experimental methods with features which do not fit into the preceding classifications will now be mentioned briefly. 

Although the direct measurement of equilibrium data for mixtures at high pressures requires detailed experimental experience and expensive equipment, it is still an es sential and reliable way in order to obtain the data needed for the evaluation of high-pressure processes. Recently, Dohrn et al. (10] presented a classification of experimental methods for high-pressure phase equilibria. Figure 2.4 illustrates the two main groups analytical methods and synthetic methods. In case of analytical... 

---