Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaluation Strategies

DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT EVALUATION STRATEGIES, PROGRESS, AND PROSPECTS. Frank M. Tims, Ph.D., ed. [Pg.361]

The Patient Care and Monitoring text box (page 699) discusses additional evaluation strategies. [Pg.696]

Adjuncts are often integrated part of regulatory evaluation strategies, but usually the derived information is not sufficient to support a final safety decision. [Pg.77]

K. Jerabek in Cross evaluation strategies in size exclusion chromatography eds. M. PoTSCHKA, P. L. Dubin, Amer. Chem. [Pg.49]

It was endeavoured to put into operation the induetive and deductive abstrae-tion or generalisation movements mentioned at the start with the aid of these evaluation strategies in the ease studies. This was done, among other reasons, in order to formulate generalisable findings (also by means of relational comparisons), which would not have been obtained solely from the inductive generalisation of the case studies. On the basis of that, at least a rough approach for the type eharaeterisation of innovative systems was developed. In the final analysis, the aim was actually to be able to formulate (very eautious ) expectations (forecasts would certainly be too mueh) about the probable direetion of irmovation, iimova-tion level and the diffusion rate of iimovative solutions in these irmovation systems on the basis of determinable system constellations and identifiable main influential factors. ... [Pg.64]

Monitoring medicine use and using the collected information to develop, implement and evaluate strategies to change inappropriate medicine use behaviour are fundamental to any national programme to promote rational use of medicines. A mandated multi-disciplinary national body to coordinate all activities and sufficient government funding are critical to success... [Pg.86]

Implementing and evaluating strategies to improve medicine use (including drug use evaluation, and liaison with antibiotic and infection control committees)... [Pg.88]

The purpose of this chapter is to review and discuss the preclinical safety evaluation strategy for vaccine approaches to the prophylaxis and treatment of viral diseases. This chapter will discuss the newer approaches to vaccination and will include recombinant proteins, peptides, polysaccharides, DNA plasmids, and viral vectors with and without adjuvants. It is outside the scope of this chapter to discuss whole cells expressing immunogens, live attenuated viruses, bacteria, or parasites. [Pg.684]

Gavin, RR et al. Quality evaluation strategy for multi-sourced active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) starting materials. J. Pharm. Biomed. 2006, 41, 1251-1259. [Pg.181]

The mixture will be classified using the criteria for substances, and taking into account the testing and evaluation strategies to develop data for these hazard classes. [Pg.128]

Figure 3.3.1 Testing and evaluation strategy for serious eye damage and eye irritation (see also Testing and evaluation strategy for skin irritation/corrosion Figure 3.2.1)... Figure 3.3.1 Testing and evaluation strategy for serious eye damage and eye irritation (see also Testing and evaluation strategy for skin irritation/corrosion Figure 3.2.1)...
Fig. 1. Simplified evaluation strategy for top seal assessment. The flow chart begins by determining if faults throws are greater than the top seal thickness. If so, then a fault seal analysis is an additional requirement. Top seals are simplified into three main types (1) massive shale, (2) layered shale/sand/silt, and (3) massive strata of other coarser grained lithologies. Key top seal risks and the data required to carry out their assessments are shown in the flow chart. The rectangles represent leakage scenarios and the ellipses indicate data which will contribute to analysis of the scenarios (abbreviations Fluid P, formation fluid pressure <5 hor, minimum horizontal stress Entry P, capillary entry pressure HC prop s, hydrocarbon physical properties, including wetting characteristics). Fig. 1. Simplified evaluation strategy for top seal assessment. The flow chart begins by determining if faults throws are greater than the top seal thickness. If so, then a fault seal analysis is an additional requirement. Top seals are simplified into three main types (1) massive shale, (2) layered shale/sand/silt, and (3) massive strata of other coarser grained lithologies. Key top seal risks and the data required to carry out their assessments are shown in the flow chart. The rectangles represent leakage scenarios and the ellipses indicate data which will contribute to analysis of the scenarios (abbreviations Fluid P, formation fluid pressure <5 hor, minimum horizontal stress Entry P, capillary entry pressure HC prop s, hydrocarbon physical properties, including wetting characteristics).
D.R. Moore S. Turner, Mechanical evaluation strategies for plastics, Cambridge University Press, 2001. [Pg.49]

RT-PCR for tyrosine-mRNA-positive cells in peripheral blood evaluation strategy and correlation with know prognostic markers in 123 melanoma patients. / Invest Dermatol, 110, 263-267. [Pg.269]


See other pages where Evaluation Strategies is mentioned: [Pg.1012]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.2548]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.2]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info