Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaluation from sign tables

This can be generalized to any number of factors. These sign tables show the factor combination to be used in the individual experimental runs,i.e. the experimental design. [Pg.97]


There has been no comprehensive evaluation of neurological function in animals after oral exposure to hexachloroethane. The data are limited primarily to clinical signs immediately after exposure and to histopathological evaluations of the brain tissues, which showed no effects. The highest NOAEL values and all LOAEL values from each reliable study for neurological effects in each species and duration category are recorded in Table 2-2 and Figure 2-2. [Pg.64]

The second integral is one of those shown in Table 2.2 and is equal to (1/2)(7r/p2)1/2. As noted above, (d2 idr)m is negative since the point of evaluation is a maximum therefore (p2) is positive, and there is no sign problem with the square root. The fact that the function in question drops off sharply with distance from the maximum implies that the first integral can be written as... [Pg.599]

The author examined comatose patients with suspected cortical ischemia with DWI who had suffered from cerebral hypoxia often after cardiac arrest (Lovblad et al. 2004). A further evaluation of an expanded series of these patients is presented in Table 16.1 26 patients with lesions attributed to hypoxia that resumes the clinical signs of all patients. This series confirms the initial observation that DWI was superior to T2-weighted MRI regarding the prediction of lesion extent. Table 16.2 presents the patterns and localizationof findings. The DWI lesions were localized in the typical watershed regions in 7 of 26 (27%) (Fig. 16.8). The cortical lesions were unilateral in one patient (4%). Basal ganglia involvement was found in 10 of 26 patients (38%), and there was also white matter involvement in 9 of 26 patients (35%) (Figs. 16.8 and 16.9). Additional infratentorial lesions were found in 3 of 19 patients (35%) (Fig. 16.8). [Pg.246]

However, it would be a serious error to confuse electronegativity or ionization energy with hardness . The clearest counter-example is Tl(III) which is a rather soft central atom but which must have a rather high ionization energy. There are other physical properties which accentuate the opposite inequality signs of (1) even more, for instance the electric polarizability. Table 1 contains many values for this quantity a in the unit 10-24 cm3. Gaseous atoms and positive ions have polarizabilities which can be calculated from wavefunctions (9) by evaluating the sum of matrix elements of induced dipole moment ... [Pg.235]

Genovese et al. (2008) characterized the miosis EC50 for sarin in a nonhuman primate (Afiican green monkey Chlorocebus aethiops) after 10 min exposures (Table 6.4). Evaluation of potential behavioral change by performance on a serial probe recognition test indicated no change from baseline for all subjects. No other clinical sign was observed. [Pg.51]

First responders require the following criteria detection sensitivity, detection accuracy, response time, recovery time and operation Table 53.9 compares these items. The numerical data are derived from our experiment. The evaluation is categorized into the three signs OK means acceptable, A means improvement required, and X means not acceptable. There are no devices that meet all CBWA detection requirements. Low sensitivity, false alarms, and the strong adsorption of CWAs on certain... [Pg.821]

Several potential biomarkers of effect for mercury have been evaluated, usually for neurological and renal dysfunction. Many of these toxic effects have been correlated with blood and urine levels (see Table 2-13). However, most indicators are nonspecific and may have resulted from other influences. As discussed in Section 2.2, many studies have examined the relationship between urine mercury levels and specific renal and neurological effects. Renal dysfunction has been studied extensively as a potential sensitive measure of mercury exposure. Signs of renal dysfunction at mercury air concentration of 0.1 mg/m3 were reported by Stewart et al. (1977). Case reports have associated the therapeutic use of inorganic mercury salts with the occurrence of nephrotic syndrome (Kazantzis et al. 1962). [Pg.348]

We can estimate the temperature range over which a chemical reaction in class 2 or 3 is spontaneous by evaluating AW and AS from tabulated data. The temperature at which AG jj = 0 is the temperature limit of spontaneity. The sign of tells us whether the reaction is spontaneous below or above this limit (Table 15-7). [Pg.633]

Consider a numerical ranking, using a equal interval scale for each criterion. (Method A requires 1.1 min/unit, while method B requires 1.0 min/unit method A requires 50 m of floor space, while method B requires 40 m. ) However, managers generally want to combine the criteria. Table 23 shows one approach. After completing the evaluation, have the affected people sign off on the evaluation form. Then go back and select features from the alternatives to get an improved set of designs. [Pg.1388]

Standards require that today s underground tanks must last thirty or more years without undue maintenance. To meet these criteria, they must be able to maintain structural integrity and resist the corrosive effects of soil and gasoline, including gasoline that has been contaminated by moisture and soil. The tank just mentioned that was removed in 1991 met these requirements, but two steel tanks unearthed from the same site at that time failed to meet them. One was dusted with white metal oxide and the other showed signs of corrosion at the weld line. Rust had weakened this joint so much that it could be scraped away with a pocketknife. Tests and evaluations were conducted on the RP tank that had been in the ground for 25 years tests were also conducted on similarly constructed tanks unearthed at 51 and 71 years that showed the RP tanks could more than meet the service requirements. Table 6.3 provides factual, useftil data from these tests. [Pg.539]


See other pages where Evaluation from sign tables is mentioned: [Pg.96]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.1125]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.715]   


SEARCH



From, table

Sign table

© 2024 chempedia.info