Enzymes uncompetitive inhibition

Like a noncompetitive inhibitor, an uncompetitive inhibitor does not compete with the substrate since it binds to the enzyme—substrate complex but not to the free enzyme. Uncompetitive inhibition... 

The three most common t3q>es of reversible inhibition occurring in enzymatic reactions are competitive, uncompetitive, and noncompetitive. (See Problem P7-12b) The enzyme molecule is analogous to the heterogeneous catalytic surface in that it contains active sites. When competitive Inhibition occurs, the substrate and inhibitor are usually similar molecules that compete for the same site on the enzyme. Uncompetitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor deactivates the enzyme-substrate complex, usually by attaching itself to both tlie substrate and enzyme molecules of the complex. Noncompetitive inhibition occurs with enzymes containing at least two different types of sites. The inhibitor attaches to only one type of site and the substrate only to the other. Derivation of the rate laws for these three types of inhibition is shown on the CD-ROM. 

Enzyme reaction kinetics were modelled on the basis of rapid equilibrium assumption. Rapid equilibrium condition (also known as quasi-equilibrium) assumes that only the early components of the reaction are at equilibrium.8-10 In rapid equilibrium conditions, the enzyme (E), substrate (S) and enzyme-substrate (ES), the central complex equilibrate rapidly compared with the dissociation rate of ES into E and product (P ). The combined inhibition effects by 2-ethoxyethanol as a non-competitive inhibitor and (S)-ibuprofen ester as an uncompetitive inhibition resulted in an overall mechanism, shown in Figure 5.20. 

P-site ligands inhibit adenylyl cyclases by a noncompetitive, dead-end- (post-transition-state) mechanism (cf. Fig. 6). Typically this is observed when reactions are conducted with Mn2+ or Mg2+ on forskolin- or hormone-activated adenylyl cyclases. However, under- some circumstances, uncompetitive inhibition has been noted. This is typically observed with enzyme that has been stably activated with GTPyS, with Mg2+ as cation. That this is the mechanism of P-site inhibition was most clearly demonstrated with expressed chimeric adenylyl cyclase studied by the reverse reaction. Under these conditions, inhibition by 2 -d-3 -AMP was competitive with cAMP. That is, the P-site is not a site per se, but rather an enzyme configuration and these ligands bind to the post-transition-state configuration from which product has left, but before the enzyme cycles to accept new substrate. Consequently, as post-transition-state inhibitors, P-site ligands are remarkably potent and specific inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases and have been used in many studies of tissue and cell function to suppress cAMP formation. 

Figure 3.2 Cartoon representations of the three major forms of reversible inhibitor interactions with enzymes (A) competitive inhibition (B) noncompetitive inhibition (C) uncompetitive inhibition. Source-. From Copeland (2000).

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the ES complex, or a subsequent species, with little or no affinity for the free enzyme is referred to as uncompetitive. Inhibitors of this modality require the prior formation of the ES complex for binding and inhibition. Hence these inhibitors affect the steps in catalysis subsequent to initial substrate binding that is, they affect the ES —> ES1 step. One might then expect that these inhibitors would exclusively affect the apparent value of Vm and not influence the value of KM. This, however, is incorrect. Recall, as illustrated in Figure 3.1, that the formation of the ESI ternary complex represents a thermodynamic cycle between the ES, El, and ESI states. Hence the augmentation of the affinity of an uncompetitive inhibitor that accompanies ES complex formation must be balanced by an equal augmentation of substrate affinity for the El complex. The result of this is that the apparent values of both Vmax and Ku decrease with increasing concentrations of an uncompetitive inhibitor (Table 3.3). The velocity equation for uncompetitive inhibition is as follows ... 

The modality of compounds that inhibit enzymes catalyzing bisubstrate reactions will differ with respect to the two substrates of the reaction, and the pattern of inhibition will depend on the reaction mechanism of the enzyme. Thus, when we use terms like competitive, noncompetitive, or uncompetitive inhibition, we must... 

A much more useful classification of inhibitors can be made on the basis of the mechanisms by which they act. Competitive inhibitors combine, with the enzyme at the same site as the substrate does, thus blocking the first step in the sequence. Noncompetitive inhibitors combine with the enzyme at some other site to give a complex that can still combine with the substrate, but the resultant ternary complex is unreactive. Uncompetitive inhibition results when the inhibitor and substrate combine with enzyme forms as in the following mechanism. 

An inhibitor can have different effects on the velocity when the substrate concentration is varied. If the inhibitor and substrate compete for the same form of the enzyme, the inhibition is COMPETITIVE. If not, the inhibition is either NONCOMPETITIVE or UNCOMPETITIVE depending on whether or not the inhibitor can affect the velocity at low substrate concentrations. 

At very low substrate concentration ([S] approaches zero), the enzyme is mostly present as E. Since an uncompetitive inhibitor does not combine with E, the inhibitor has no effect on the velocity and no effect on Vmsa/Km (the slope of the double-reciprocal plot). In this case, termed uncompetitive, the slopes of the double-reciprocal plots are independent of inhibitor concentration and only the intercepts are affected. A series of parallel lines results when different inhibitor concentrations are used. This type of inhibition is often observed for enzymes that catalyze the reaction between two substrates. Often an inhibitor that is competitive against one of the substrates is found to give uncompetitive inhibition when the other substrate is varied. The inhibitor does combine at the active site but does not prevent the binding of one of the substrates (and vice versa). 

A single enzyme, inositol monophosphatase, leads to loss of the remaining phosphate and the regeneration of free inositol. This enzyme exhibits similar affinities for all five of the equatorial inositol monophosphate hydroxyls. Inositol 2-phosphate, which is not produced in this degra-dative pathway, is a poor substrate, a property that is probably attributable to its axial configuration. The enzyme is inhibited by Li+ in an uncompetitive manner i.e. the degree of inhibition is a function of substrate concentration. The putative link between the ability of Li+ to interfere with phosphoinositide turnover and its therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorders is discussed in Box 20-1 and Chapter 55. It should be noted that unlike most other tissues, brain can synthesize inositol de novo by the action of inositol monophosphate synthase, which cyclizes glucose 6-phosphate to form I(3)P. The enzyme has been localized immunohistochemically to the brain vasculature. 

Uncompetitive inhibition is extremely rare in nature, and can arise when the inhibitor binds to the enzyme-substrate complex, rather than to the free enzyme, as in competitive inhibition [111]. In uncompetitive inhibition, an increase in the concentration of the inhibitor requires a disproportionately large increase in the concentration of the substrate to maintain the same metabolic turnover. 

In uncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor combines with enzyme-substrate complex to form an uncreative complex (InES) as follows ... 

The inhibition can be interpreted as an increase of the Michaelis constant KM. In the case of uncompetitive inhibition (Fig. 9B), the binding of the substrate to the enzyme is not affected. However, the [ES] complex becomes inactive upon binding of the inhibitor Using Kj —> oo, the corresponding rate equation is... 

Full and partial uncompetitive inhibitory mechanisms, (a) Reaction scheme for full uncompetitive inhibition indicates ordered binding of substrate and inhibitor to two mutually exclusive sites. The presence of inhibitor prevents release of product, (b) Lineweaver-Burk plot for full uncompetitive inhibition reveals a series of parallel lines and an increase in the 1/v axis intercept to infinity at infinitely high inhibitor concentrations. In this example, Ki = 3 iulM. (c) Replot of Lineweaver-Burk slopes from (b) is linear, confirming a full inhibitory mechanism, (d) Reaction scheme for partial uncompetitive inhibition indicates random binding of substrate and inhibitor to two mutually exclusive sites. The presence of inhibitor alters the rate of release of product (by a factor P) and the affinity of enzyme for substrate (by a factor a) to an identical degree, while the presence of substrate alters the affinity of enzyme for inhibitor by a. (e) Lineweaver-Burk plot for partial uncompetitive inhibition reveals a series of parallel lines and an increase in the 1/v axis intercept to a finite value at infinitely high inhibitor concentrations. In this example, Ki = 3 iulM and a = = 0.5. (f) Replot of Lineweaver-Burk slopes from (e) is hyperbolic, confirming a partial inhibitory mechanism... 

For the case of uncompetitive inhibition, where an inhibitor can combine only with the enzyme-substrate complex, the rate equation is given as... 

Some substrates inhibit cell growth at high concentrations. Equation 4.9, one of the expressions for such cases, can be obtained on the assumption that excess substrate will inhibit cell growth, in analogy to the uncompetitive inhibition in enzyme reactions, for which Equation 3.42 holds ... 

Reversible inhibition of an enzyme is competitive, uncompetitive, or mixed. Competitive inhibitors compete with substrate by binding reversibly to the active site, but they are not transformed by the enzyme. Uncompetitive inhibitors bind only to the ES complex, at a site distinct from the active site. Mixed inhibitors bind to either E or ES, again at a site distinct from the active site. In irreversible inhibition an inhibitor binds permanently to an active site by forming a covalent bond or a veiy stable noncovalent interaction. 

A substrate analog will frequently inhibit only one of the two forms of a multisubstrate enzyme with a ping-pong mechanism.1 72 Reciprocal plots made for various inhibitor concentrations consist of a family of parallel lines reminiscent of uncompetitive inhibition. Observation of such parallel line plots can support a ping-pong mechanism for an enzyme but cannot prove it because in some cases parallel lines are observed for inhibition of enzymes acting by an ordered sequential mechanism. The following question arises naturally for any ordered bimolecular reaction (Eq. 9-43) Of the... 

Fiqtire 3.5 (a) Competitive inhibition inhibitor and substrate compete for the same binding site. For example, indole, phenol, and benzene bind in the binding pocket of chymotrypsin and inhibit the hydrolysis of derivatives of tryptophan, tyrosine, and / phenylalanine, (b) Noncompetitive inhibition inhibitor and substrate bind simultaneously to the enzyme. An example is the inhibition of fructose 1,6-diphosphatase by AMP. This type of inhibition is very common with multisubstrate enzymes. A rare example of / uncompetitive inhibition of a single-substrate enzyme is the inhibition of alkaline phosphatase by L-phenylalanine. This enzyme is composed of two identical subunitjs, so presumably the phenylalanine binds at one site and the substrate at the other. [From N. K. Ghosh and W. H. Fishman, J. Biol. Chem. 241, 2516 (1966) see also M. Caswell and M. Caplow, Biochemistry 19, 2907 (1980). 

Reversible inhibition occurs rapidly in a system which is near its equilibrium point and its extent is dependent on the concentration of enzyme, inhibitor and substrate. It remains constant over the period when the initial reaction velocity studies are performed. In contrast, irreversible inhibition may increase with time. In simple single-substrate enzyme-catalysed reactions there are three main types of inhibition patterns involving reactions following the Michaelis-Menten equation competitive, uncompetitive and non-competitive inhibition. Competitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor directly competes with the substrate in forming the enzyme complex. Uncompetitive inhibition involves the interaction of the inhibitor with only the enzyme-substrate complex, while non-competitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor binds to either the enzyme or the enzyme-substrate complex without affecting the binding of the substrate. The kinetic modifications of the Michaelis-Menten equation associated with the various types of inhibition are shown below. The derivation of these equations is shown in Appendix S.S. 

Non-competitive inhibition is more complicated than either competitive or uncompetitive inhibition. A non-competitive inhibitor can combine with an enzyme molecule to produce a dead-end complex regardless of whether a substrate molecule is bound or not. Hence the inhibitor must bind at a different... 

Still another possibility is that the inhibitor binds only to the enzyme-substrate complex and not to the free enzyme (fig. 7.14c). This reaction is called uncompetitive inhibition. Uncompetitive inhibition is rare in reactions that involve a single substrate but more common in reactions with multiple substrates. Plots of 1/v versus 1/[S] at different concentrations of an uncompetitive inhibitor give a series of parallel lines. 

---