Noncompetitive inhibition, enzymes

Inhibition of enzymes can basically be divided into reversible or irreversible. According to inhibition kinetics, it can be divided into three types— competitive, non competitive, and allosteric. Competitive inhibition can be characterized by binding of the inhibitor to the active site of the enzyme (they are structurally similar to substrate) and inhibition can be reversed by substrate access (reversible inhibition). The reaction rate is dependent on the substrate and inhibitor concentrations and their affinity to the enzyme. Noncompetitive inhibition cannot be reversed by substrate access and the inhibitor reacts with other parts of the enzyme rather than the active site, and it is not structurally similar to the substrate. The enzymatic reaction can be irreversible when the affinity of the inhibitor to the enzyme is relatively high. Allosteric ligands (inhibitors or activators) are bound to quite another... 

Like a noncompetitive inhibitor, an uncompetitive inhibitor does not compete with the substrate since it binds to the enzyme—substrate complex but not to the free enzyme. Uncompetitive inhibition... 

Pure noncompetitive inhibition occurs if Ki = Ki. This situation is relatively uncommon the Lineweaver-Burk plot for such an instance is given in Eigure 14.15. Note that K is unchanged by I (the x-intercept remains the same, with or without I). Note also that Tmax decreases. A similar pattern is seen if the amount of enzyme in the experiment is decreased. Thus, it is as if I lowered [E],... 

If the inhibitor combines irreversibly with the enzyme—for example, by covalent attachment—the kinetic pattern seen is like that of noncompetitive inhibition, because the net effect is a loss of active enzyme. Usually, this type of inhibition can be distinguished from the noncompetitive, reversible inhibition case since the reaction of I with E (and/or ES) is not instantaneous. Instead, there is a time-dependent decrease in enzymatic activity as E + I El proceeds, and the rate of this inactivation can be followed. Also, unlike reversible inhibitions, dilution or dialysis of the enzyme inhibitor solution does not dissociate the El complex and restore enzyme activity. 

In noncompetitive inhibition, binding of the inhibitor does not affect binding of substrate. Formation of both EI and EIS complexes is therefore possible. However, while the enzyme-inhibitor complex can still bind substrate, its efficiency at transforming substrate to product, reflected by is decreased. Noncompetitive... 

For simple noncompetitive inhibition, E and EI possess identical affinity for substrate, and the EIS complex generates product at a negligible rate (Figure 8-10). More complex noncompetitive inhibition occurs when binding of the inhibitor does affect the apparent affinity of the enzyme for substrate, causing the tines to intercept in either the third or fourth quadrants of a double reciprocal plot (not shown). 

Figure 3.2 Cartoon representations of the three major forms of reversible inhibitor interactions with enzymes (A) competitive inhibition (B) noncompetitive inhibition (C) uncompetitive inhibition. Source-. From Copeland (2000).

Because noncompetitive inhibitors bind to both the free enzyme and the ES complex, or subsequent species in the reaction pathway, we would expect these molecules to exert a kinetic effect on the E + S —> ES" process, thus effecting the apparent values of both VmdX/KM (influenced by both the K and al, terms) and Vmax (influenced by the aK term). This is reflected in the velocity equation for noncompetitive inhibition ... 

The presence of some substances may hinder the action of an enzyme. Such substances are known as inhibitors, and in some cases the inhibitor may be a metal. It is not necessary to describe all the ways in which an inhibitor may reduce the activity of an enzyme, but one way is by binding to the substrate. This is known as competitive inhibition, and it applies to cases in which the inhibitor competes with the substrate in binding to the enzyme. In noncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds to the enzyme and alters its structure so it can no longer bind to the substrate. In some instances, certain metal ions function as inhibitors of enzyme action, which can be a cause of the toxicity referred to earlier. 

An inhibitor can have different effects on the velocity when the substrate concentration is varied. If the inhibitor and substrate compete for the same form of the enzyme, the inhibition is COMPETITIVE. If not, the inhibition is either NONCOMPETITIVE or UNCOMPETITIVE depending on whether or not the inhibitor can affect the velocity at low substrate concentrations. 

At higher concentrations of Li+, it is proposed that the observed noncompetitive inhibition of IMPase [105] is due to Li+ binding to the first Mg2+ site on the free enzyme [115]. As predicted from the crystal structure, this site is located deep within the active cleft of the enzyme and is therefore relatively inaccessible to the Li+. 

A reciprocal plot of the effect of varying concentrations of a noncompetitive inhibitor on enzyme-catalyzed substrate turnover readily reveals the nature and characteristics of this type of inhibition (Fig. 3.6). Notice that in this case, the properties that characterize noncompetitive inhibition are virtually opposite of those that characterize competitive inhibition. With a noncompetitive inhibitor Emax does change but KM is constant. 

In noncompetitive inhibition the inhibitor combines with the free enzyme or with enzyme-substrate complex. The inhibitor combines at different active sites of the enzyme and does not compete with the substrate for the same active site... 

For all intent and purpose, inhibition of CYP enzymes can be classified into two categories reversible (e.g. competitive and noncompetitive) inhibition and mechanism-based (e.g. quasi-irreversible and irreversible) inhibition [93]. The remainder of this chapter will be divided to reflect these two categories of inhibition and will focus solely on CYP-based drug interactions. 

In the case of noncompetitive inhibition (Fig. 9C), the inhibitor may bind to the [ES] complex, as well as to the free enzyme. In the simplest case, with Ki = Kjj, we obtain... 

In addition to the binding of substrate (or in some cases co-substrates) at the active site, many enzymes have the capacity to bind regulatory molecules at sites which are usually spatially far removed from the catalytic site. In fact, allosteric enzymes are invariably multimeric (i.e. have a quaternary structure) and the allosteric (regulatory) sites are on different subunits of the protein to the active site. In all cases, the binding of the regulatory molecules is non covalent and is described in kinetic terms as noncompetitive inhibition. 

Despite the large amount of biochemical and structural studies of sirtuins in complex with various substrates, cofactors and reaction products, the catalytic mechanism of this class of enzymes is still a matter of debate. SN -like [56] and SN -like [60] mechanisms have been inferred from structural studies but further biochemical and possibly structural studies will be required to clarify which mechanism is used by sirtuins. It should also be noted that another matter of debate concerns the mode of noncompetitive inhibition of sirtuins by the reaction product nicotinamide [62], various structural studies having highlighted different binding pockets for this molecule [63, 64]. 

Enzyme inhibition by an extremely tight-binding inhibi-tor When the substrate(s), regardless of the detailed mode of inhibition, has (have) a negligible effect on the formation of enzyme-inhibitor (E-I) complex, the net result is depletion i.e., the removal of enzyme by the inhibitor from the reaction). The observed kinetic pattern is identical to the simple noncompetitive inhibition case the substrate and the inhibitor do not affect each other s binding, because only V sk is changed due to reduced enzyme concentration, while remains unaltered. 

The rate equation to be used for kinetic analysis of enzyme depletion is that for simple noncompetitive inhibition. If the Henderson equation or similar types are not employed, keep in mind that the inhibitor concentration [I] is the free inhibitor concentration. Determination of Ki may not be feasible if the rate assay is insensitive and requires an enzyme concentration much greater than K[. Alternatively, Ki may be obtained by measuring the on-off rate constants of the E l complex, provided the rate constants for any conformation change steps involved are also known. 

When the presence of substance B causes the slowdown of the enzyme-substrate reaction of A to R, then B is called an inhibitor. We have various kinds of inhibitor action, the simplest models being called competitive and noncompetitive. We have competitive inhibition when A and B attack the same site on the enzyme. We have noncompetitive inhibition when B attacks a different site on the enzyme, but in doing so stops the action of A. In simple pictures this action is shown in Fig. 27.7. 

Compared to enzyme reactions without inhibition we see that both k and are modified here. Thus, for noncompetitive inhibition,... 

---