Environmental sample conditions

The term species generally refers to the molecular forms of an element or a cluster of atoms of different elements in a given (in this case solid) matrix (Bernhard et al., 1986a). The term form is also used to indicate uncertainty or lack of knowledge about the exact nature of the species one expects to find in an environmental sample. Conditional speciation assessment techniques like sequential extractions or leaching tests are not able to yield information at the true molecular level in solid phases thus the more general term form is used rather than species when referring to the results of such techniques commonly applied to date to soils and sediments. 

The objective ia any analytical procedure is to determine the composition of the sample (speciation) and the amounts of different species present (quantification). Spectroscopic techniques can both identify and quantify ia a single measurement. A wide range of compounds can be detected with high specificity, even ia multicomponent mixtures. Many spectroscopic methods are noninvasive, involving no sample collection, pretreatment, or contamination (see Nondestructive evaluation). Because only optical access to the sample is needed, instmments can be remotely situated for environmental and process monitoring (see Analytical METHODS Process control). Spectroscopy provides rapid real-time results, and is easily adaptable to continuous long-term monitoring. Spectra also carry information on sample conditions such as temperature and pressure. 

While these calculations provide information about the ultimate equilibrium conditions, redox reactions are often slow on human time scales, and sometimes even on geological time scales. Furthermore, the reactions in natural systems are complex and may be catalyzed or inhibited by the solids or trace constituents present. There is a dearth of information on the kinetics of redox reactions in such systems, but it is clear that many chemical species commonly found in environmental samples would not be present if equilibrium were attained. Furthermore, the conditions at equilibrium depend on the concentration of other species in the system, many of which are difficult or impossible to determine analytically. Morgan and Stone (1985) reviewed the kinetics of many environmentally important reactions and pointed out that determination of whether an equilibrium model is appropriate in a given situation depends on the relative time constants of the chemical reactions of interest and the physical processes governing the movement of material through the system. This point is discussed in some detail in Section 15.3.8. In the absence of detailed information with which to evaluate these time constants, chemical analysis for metals in each of their oxidation states, rather than equilibrium calculations, must be conducted to evaluate the current state of a system and the biological or geochemical importance of the metals it contains. 

The degradation of agrochemicals during storage may result from a variety of factors such as acidic and alkaline hydrolysis, enzymatic action, etc. It is recommended that a preliminary stability study be performed for the chemical in the environmental sample. If the chemical is stable under acidic conditions, for example, samples can be stored after acidification with hydrochloric or phosphoric acid. 

Field fortification (commonly referred to as field spiking) is the procedure used to prepare study sample matrices to which have been added a known amount of the active ingredient of the test product. The purpose for having field fortification samples available in a worker exposure study is to provide some idea of what happens to the test chemical under the exact environmental field conditions which the worker experiences and to determine the field storage stability of the test substance on or in the field matrix materials. Field fortifications do not serve the purpose of making precise decisions about the chemical, which can better be tested in a controlled laboratory environment. The researcher should not assume that a field fortification sample by its nature provides 100% recovery of the active ingredient at all times. For example, a field fortification sample by its very nature may be prone to cross-contamination of the sample from environmental contaminants expected or not expected to be present at the field site. 

Chau et al. [19] have described the optimum conditions for extraction of alkyllead compounds from sediments originating in non-saline waters and in saline waters [16]. Analyses of some environmental samples revealed for the... 

With the application of FIA in the mixture analytical mode for the analysis of environmental samples and after a marginal sample pretreatment by SPE, matrix effects are a high probability. But, as cited previously [27—31], matrix effects were not only observed with FIA but also in LC-MS and MS—MS modes. Advice to overcome these problems by, e.g. an improved sample preparation, dilution of the analyte solution, application of stable isotopic modification of LC conditions [29] or even application of two-dimensional LC separations [27], postcolumn standard addition [29], addition of additives into the mobile phase (e.g. propionic acid, ammonium formate) [34,35] or even matrix compounds [32] were proposed and discussed. 

API-MS methods have been successfully applied to the quantification of M2D-C3-0-(E0)n-Me, with reliable and reproducible results obtained after online HPLC separation [29,30]. The method was used to quantify recoveries of the surfactant from the surface of plant foliage and from solid substrates under controlled laboratory conditions. Extension of the method to environmental samples has not been investigated. The entire linear dynamic range for HPLC-APCI-MS was not determined, but linearity was observed within the required... 

When AESs of an industrial blend were examined by ESI—MS— MS(—), all AES homologues under standard CID conditions (collision energy +20-50 eV collision gasArgon pressure 1.5 mTorr) resulted in a very simple product ion spectrum that contained the parent ion and only one product ion mlz 97 ([HS04]-) (cf. Fig. 2.11.10). Vice versa, the parent ion scan mode applying mlz 97 helped to recognise AES in blends, formulations and environmental samples [49,60] however, interferences with sulfate compounds other than AES cannot be excluded. The same fragmentation behaviour was found if APCI-FIA-MS-MS(-) was applied however, the sensitivity was reduced compared with ESI-FIA-MS-MS(—). 

Analytical methods for detecting phenol in environmental samples are summarized in Table 6-2. The accuracy and sensitivity of phenol determination in environmental samples depends on sample preconcentration and pretreatment and the analytical method employed. The recovery of phenol from air and water by the various preconcentration methods is usually low for samples containing low levels of phenol. The two preconcentration methods commonly used for phenols in water are adsorption on XAD resin and adsorption on carbon. Both can give low recoveries, as shown by Van Rossum and Webb (1978). Solvent extraction at acidic pH with subsequent solvent concentration also gives unsatisfactory recovery for phenol. Even during carefully controlled conditions, phenol losses of up to 60% may occur during solvent evaporation (Handson and Hanrahan 1983). The in situ acetylation with subsequent solvent extraction as developed by Sithole et al. (1986) is probably one of the most promising methods. 

Because SPMDs sequester a wide variety of organic solutes or vapors of hydrophobic chemicals, care must be used to prevent inadvertent contamination of the devices. Of particular concern for SPMDs destined to be used for environmental sampling is the fact that SPMDs clear large volumes of vapor phase chemicals from air. For example, under low flow conditions (<5 cm s ) at about 22 °C the Rs... 

---