Employer accident investigation

The employer investigates incidents that result in, or could result in, a catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemicals. An incident investigation is initiated as soon as possible, but before 48 hours following the incident. An incident investigation team is established to consist of one or more experts in the process involved, and accident investigation. The report prepared at the conclusion of the investigation includes at a minimum ... 

A detailed, defined, and recorded review of an incident undertaken to identify and record the causes and contributing factors and their relationships, which led up to and caused the incident. Accident Investigation is a technique that allows an organization to learn from its experience. The intent of an incident investigation is for employers to learn from past experiences and thus avoid repeating past mistakes. See also Incident Investigation Team. 

Vehicle maintenance Some experts indicate that about 90% of accident investigations reveal that a human serves as one of the primary causes. Proper vehicle maintenance and documentation is critical. Drivers must use a vehicle inspection checkhst and do a daily inspection. Fleet repair shops must employ qualified mechanics that conduct periodic maintenance. Drivers can perform only as good as their equipment. Poorly maintained equipment is an accident waiting to happen. 

It is usually a good idea for the employer to keep a record of all safety and health training. Records can provide evidence of the employer s good faith and compliance with OSHA standards. Documentation can also supply an answer to one of the first questions an accident investigator will ask Was the injured employee trained to do the job ... 

Many companies conduct accident investigations and keep accident records and other data on the company s safety and health initiatives. If a company has a sufficient number of accidents/incidents and enongh detail in their occupational injury/illness investigation data, the company can begin to examine trends or emerging issues relevant to their safety and health intervention/prevention efforts. The analysis of this data can be nsed to evaluate the effectiveness of safety and health at various workplaces, jobsites, or for groups of workers. The safety and health data can be used by a company to compare to that of other companies that perform similar work, employ a comparable workforce, or compete in the same kind and size of market on a state, regional, national, or international basis. 

Any inspection of an employer s factory, plant, establishment, construction site, or other area, workplace or environment where work is performed by an employee of an employer, and includes any inspection conducted pursuant to a complaint filed under 1903.11(a) and (c), any reinspection, follow-up inspection, accident investigation or other inspection conducted under suction 8(a) of the Act. 

The Railway Inspectorate s oi anization at this time reveals a strong division between what it termed its traditional activities and its newly acquired health and safety duties." Railway employment inspectors who were primarily responsible for health and safety matters were numerically dominant within the Railway Inspectorate but inspecting officers, who in the main dealt with the more traditional activities, were more senior. The inspection of new works was exclusively the remit of inspecting officers accident investigation was undertaken by all members of the Railway Inspectorate. Public inquiries were undertaken by inspecting officers whereas the less public investigations were undertaken by railway employment inspectors. 

Reactive work made variable demands on the Inspectorate. Complaints did not represent a major demand upon Railway Inspectorate time. Accidents figured rather more prominently in mobilizing resources. Accident investigation was an important part of inspecting officers workload but it figured less prominently in the work of railway employment inspectors. ... 

The Inspectorate s mobilization of resources therefore emphasized the importance of the objectives of prevention of non-compliance and the constitution of everyday compliance. This was especially the case for railway employment inspectors whose remit was, of coiurse, largely concerned with occupational health and safety. Accident investigation could take up substantial amounts of time especially if there had been a high profile accident involving the public. But this tended to be the concern of inspecting officers and was, as history would suggest, very much a public safety concern and not so much a matter of occupational health and safety. Overall therefore the Railway Inspectorate s objectives, as revealed in their mobUization of resources, were in line with the apparent legal objectives. 

Predictably, this approach generated a ready suppfy of perceived causes that focused on the individual. These causes are still in wide use to(%. They are not causes but, rather, excuses however, they are so widefy accepted by both employers and employees that changing people s attitude to their use will prove difficult A quick look at supposed causes in accident investigation reports will reveal, amongst others ... 

Seppanen, S. (1997). The Investigation Procedure of Fatal Employment Accidents. Work Safety Health, Helsinki, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. 

ROES do not need to be confined to consultation related to these Regulations. Some employers have ROES sitting on safety committees and taking part in accident investigation similar to trade union safety representatives. 

Q. May employers attach missing information to their accident investigation or workers compensation forms to make them an acceptable substitute form for the OSHA 301 for recordkeeping purposes ... 

Future refinements of RIDDOR may result following current consultation on the need for Regulations specifically requiring employers to investigate the circumstances of all accidents, and following the outcome of trials held in Scotland on the reporting of injury details by telephone. 

Besides involvement with accident investigations, the FLS should have a major role in completing the process of getting the injured worker back to work and fully productive. Acclimatization is a principle employed to get team members used to working in temperatures that vary from normal room temperature. This principle eases people into working in these extreme temperatures for short periods that increase a little each day or work shift. For full acclimatization, it may take a few weeks. A similar process may be necessary when an injured worker comes back to his or her department to perform work. 

Logical models aim at analysing the canses of accidents in terms of logical relations between events and conditions in the affected system. The models are based on the systems concept, which means that a production system is understood in terms of its components and the relationship between these. They are typically applied in theoretical analyses to estimate the risk of accidents (risk analyses) but may also be employed in diagrams to display the results of an accident investigation. 

---