Elements, list accuracy

Before we can discuss the issue of mass accuracy we must first consider what we mean by this term. If we examine Table 5.1 more closely, we see that the only element listed with an integral mass i.e. a whole number) is as defined by the lUPAC convention, and when we calculate the monoisotopic mass of an analyte we always find that it is not an integer. 

An important question in the development and application of any new analytical procedure is what is the state of the art One aspect of the state of the art with respect to the determination of trace elements in urine is illustrated in Table I. The table shows the range of reported analytical values and the model values for 24-hour urinary excretion of a number of trace elements, as compiled from the report of the Task Group on Reference Man (6). The main feature of the information in Table I is that the range of reported normal values covers two orders of magnitude for most of the elements listed. There may be considerable variation in the normal excretion of trace elements in urine, but the extent of the ranges shown in the table also may be signiflcantly and artificially enhanced by wide variations in the accuracy of the analytical results that were surveyed. The latter view is supported by the data... 

Similar accuracies have been found for thick, homogeneous, complex specimens when corrections for secondary excitation are also included. With appropriate standards, total accuracies of 2% have been demonstrated. Because the determination of the lighter elements (i.e., 5 < Z< 15) are more sensitive to the uncertainties in the data base items listed above, less accuracy should be expected for these elements. 

Because of their central importance in chemistry, atomic weights have been continually refined and improved since the first tabulations by Dalton (1803 -5). By 1808 Dalton had included 20 elements in his list and these results were substantially extended and improved by Berzelius during the following decades. An illustration of the dramatic and continuing improvement in accuracy and precision during the past 100 y is given in Table 1.3. In 1874 no atomic weight was quoted to better than one part in 200, but by 1903 33 elements had values quoted to one part in 10 and 2 of these (silver and... 

A list of onstream process analyzers, operating principles, manufacturers, costs, advantages, and disadvantages is given in reference 2. A list of process instrument elements with their accuracy and principles of operation is given in reference 3. 

CRMs were inserted into the approximately 3000 samples in the 76-element geochemical mapping pilot project in southwestern China. The RSD% of these determinations and the certified values are listed in Table 3. All the RSD are less than 25% and the analytical data are considered accurate. Data accuracy had also been subsequently justified from the mapping results. 

Table A. 1 comprises the stable elements from hydrogen to bismuth with the radioactive elements technetium and promethium omitted. Natural variations in isotopic composition of some elements such as carbon or lead do not allow for more accurate values, a fact also reflected in the accuracy of their relative atomic mass. However, exact masses of the isotopes are not affected by varying abundances. The isotopic masses listed may differ up to some 10 u in other publications.

In qualitative analysis, the isotopic distribution remains an important information. For example in the case the parent drug contains Br or Cl, metabolites or decomposition products can be easily identified by considering the isotopic distribution. With accurate mass measurements a list of elemental compositions can be proposed for a compound for a given accuracy range. Because the intensity of the isotopic distribution is also dependent on the elemental composition of the molecule it can be used to reduce the list of possible elemental formulas [17]. 

The accuracy of the x-ray fluorescence method was evaluated by calculating, from the 50 whole coals analyzed, the mean variation of each element from its mean concentration, determined by the other independent methods previously mentioned and listed in Table III. Detection... 

When a targeted list is not used to drive the process, analysis may be conducted to assess all metabolites present. The observed m/z is compared with all possible elemental compositions that could produce the observed value, within constraints imposed by the user as described below. Accuracy and precision in the m/z measurement become critical in limiting the possible compositions to the greatest extent possible, greatly simplifying data reduction (Grange and Sovocool, 2008 Ruan et al., 2008). These techniques are discussed in Chapters 4 and 5. 

More input information is required to perform a CNDO calculation than an EH calculation. The same requirements for choice of atomic orbitals and ionization potentials, described before for EH, must be made. In addition, electron affinity data for each orbital must be employed and usually this is known with least accuracy. Tables of data for some orbitals have been compiled by Zollweg (31) however, in some cases these data must be estimated. The resonance parameter must be chosen by some procedure for each kind of atom. Pople et al. (2) have recommended values for low atomic number elements, and the fitting of calculated to experimental diatomic molecule data has been used (30) as a criterion for choice in other work. Table I lists input data that we have used for previous MO calculations. 

It can be mentioned here that another pioneer of the periodic system, the German Julius Lothar Meyer (1830-1895) did not list the rare earths in his first periodic table, because he was not convinced that the rare earths were genuine elements (van Spronsen, 1969). He also foimd that their atomic weights had not been determined with sufficient accuracy. 

Review of 10% samples for all the listed elements review holding times, blank contamination, precision, accuracy, error determination, detection limits, and confirmed identification for the remaining 90%. 

The elements, the number of procedures which were developed, the detection limits, the concentration range at which the precision was measured, and the coefficient of variation are listed in Table l.L Figure 1.1 summarizes accuracy data for all of the methods that were developed, with 20% limits drawn around the theoretical match line. All of the data obtained at the initiating laboratories were within the 20% limit... 

---