Electrothermal atomizer detection limits

Laser-excited atomic fluorescence spectrometry is capable of extremely low detection limits, particularly when combined with electrothermal atomization. Detection limits in the femtogram (10 g) to attogram (10 g) range have been shown for many elements. Commercial instrumentation has not been developed for laser-based AFS, probably because of its expense and the nonroutine nature of high-powered lasers. Atomic fluorescence has the disadvantage of being a singleelement method unless tunable lasers with their inherent complexities are used. 

With this method heavy metals are atomized electrothermally. The detection limits are about 100-times lower than those for the Flame-AAS. Problems with interference signals at this very low measuring range (below lp/1) can be overcome by using the Zeemaim correction technique [2]. 

The section on Spectroscopy has been retained but with some revisions and expansion. The section includes ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, fluorescence, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray spectrometry. Detection limits are listed for the elements when using flame emission, flame atomic absorption, electrothermal atomic absorption, argon induction coupled plasma, and flame atomic fluorescence. Nuclear magnetic resonance embraces tables for the nuclear properties of the elements, proton chemical shifts and coupling constants, and similar material for carbon-13, boron-11, nitrogen-15, fluorine-19, silicon-19, and phosphoms-31. 

Electrothermal vaporization can be used for 5-100 )iL sample solution volumes or for small amounts of some solids. A graphite furnace similar to those used for graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry can be used to vaporize the sample. Other devices including boats, ribbons, rods, and filaments, also can be used. The chosen device is heated in a series of steps to temperatures as high as 3000 K to produce a dry vapor and an aerosol, which are transported into the center of the plasma. A transient signal is produced due to matrix and element-dependent volatilization, so the detection system must be capable of time resolution better than 0.25 s. Concentration detection limits are typically 1-2 orders of magnitude better than those obtained via nebulization. Mass detection limits are typically in the range of tens of pg to ng, with a precision of 10% to 15%. 

Electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometry with Zeeman background correction was used by Zhang et al. [141] for the determination of cadmium in seawater. Citric acid was used as an organic matrix modifier and was found to be more effective than EDTA or ascorbic acid. The organic matrix modifier reduced the interferences from salts and other trace metals and gave a linear calibration curve for cadmium at concentrations < 1.6 pg/1. The method has a limit of detection of 0.019 pg/1 of cadmium and recoveries of 95-105% at the 0.2 pg of cadmium level. 

Nishioka et al. [525] coprecipitated nickel from seawater with sodium di-ethyldithiocarbamate, filtered, and redissolved the precipitate with nitric acid followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotography determination of the nickel. The detection limit was 0.5 p,g/l and the relative standard deviation was 13.2% at the 2 ig/l level. 

Chang et al. [952] used a miniature column packed with a chelating resin and an automatic online preconcentration system for electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry to determine cadmium, cobalt, and nickel in seawater. Detection limits of 0.12,7 and 35 ng/1 were achieved for cadmium, cobalt, and nickel, respectively, with very small sample volume required (400-1800 xl). 

Chemistry (Brown et al. 1981). Direct aspiration into a flame and atomization in an electrically heated graphite furnace or carbon rod are the two variants of atomic absorption. The latter is sometimes referred to as electrothermal AAS. Typical detection limits for electrothermal AAS are <0.3 pg/L, while the limit for flame AAS and ICP-AES is 3. 0 pg/L (Stoeppler 1984). The precision of analytical techniques for elemental determinations in blood, muscles, and various biological materials has been investigated (Iyengar 1989). Good precision was obtained with flame AAS after preconcentration and separation, electrothermal AAS, and ICP-AES. 

Electrothermal atomizers are also suitable for AFS as, when an inert gas atmosphere is used, quenching will be minimized. In the nuclear, electronic, semiconductor and biomedical industries where detection limits have to be pushed as low as 1 part in lO (or 0.1 pg g- in the original sample), electrothermal atomization with a laser as excitation source (LIF-ETA) may be used. Figure 6.5 shows schematically a common way of observing the fluorescence in LIF-ETA. The fluorescence signal can be efficiently collected by the combination of a plane mirror, with a hole at its centre to allow excitation by the laser, positioned at 45° with respect to the longitudinal axis of the tube and a lens chosen to focus the central part of the tube into the entrance slit of the fluorescence monochromator. 

Barium is present at very low concentrations in most environmental samples. Thus, in spite of the availability of a detection limit of only a few ng ml 1 by flame AES, the element is rarely determined by flame methods AAS with electrothermal atomization or ICP-AES is more commonly used. A notable exception is in the determination of the element in barium-rich geological deposits.8 Another exception is in the analysis of formation waters from offshore oil wells.9 However, in this matrix, inter-element interferences are encountered from alkali and alkali-earth elements. These could be effectively eliminated by the addition of 5 g 1 1 magnesium and 3 g 1 1 sodium as a modifier.9... 

F-AAS is a powerful technique [1], but it may not always provide the necessary sensitivity for the determination of trace elements present at extremely low concentrations. AAS procedures utilizing electrothermal atomization in place of [Same atomization give potential for much increased sensitivity. ET-AAS is a highly sensitive technique for element determination, typically characterized by 10D100 times lower limits of detection (LoDs) than conventional F-AAS. 

Flameless atomic absorption using an electrothermal atomiser is essentially a non-routine technique requiring specialist expertise. It is slower than flame analysis only 10—20 samples can be analysed in an hour furthermore, the precision is poorer (1—10%) than that for conventional flame atomic absorption (1%). The main advantage of the method, however, is its superior sensitivity for any metal the sensitivity is 100—1000 times greater when measured by the flameless as opposed to the flame technique. For this reason flameless atomic absorption is employed in the analysis of water samples where the flame techniques have insufficient sensitivity. An example of this is with the elements barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and vanadium, all of which are required for public health reasons to be measured in raw and potable waters (section I.B). Because these elements are generally at the lOOjugl-1 level and less in water, their concentration is below the detection limit when determined by flame atomic absorption as a result, an electrothermal atomisation (ETA) technique is often employed for their determination. 

Traditional flame atomization methods have been preferred for atomic absorption analysis of ceramics. Very little mention has been made of electrothermal atomization (ETAA) in the literature. Although ETAA offers increased sensitivity with lower detection limits and smaller sample sizes, the problems of matrix interference (22-25) have resulted in the development of sample-specific methods for ETAA. 

Persson and Irgum determined sub-p.p.m. concentrations of DMAA in seawater by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry was used as a sensitive and specific detector for arsenic. The technique allowed DMAA to be determined in a sample (20 ml) containing a 10 -fold excess of inorganic arsenic with a detection limit of 0.02ng As ml ... 

---