Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic materials surface analysis

Analysis of Surface Elemental Composition. A very important class of surface analysis methods derives from the desire to understand what elements reside at the surface or in the near-surface region of a material. The most common techniques used for deterrnination of elemental composition are the electron spectroscopies in which electrons or x-rays are used to stimulate either electron or x-ray emission from the atoms in the surface (or near-surface region) of the sample. These electrons or x-rays are emitted with energies characteristic of the energy levels of the atoms from which they came, and therefore, contain elemental information about the surface. Only the most important electron spectroscopies will be discussed here, although an array of techniques based on either the excitation of surfaces with or the collection of electrons from the surface have been developed for the elucidation of specific information about surfaces and interfaces. [Pg.274]

In Surface Analysis by Laser Ionization (SALI), a probe beam such as an ion beam, electron beam, or laser is directed onto a surfiice to remove a sample of material. An untuned, high-intensity laser beam passes parallel and close to but above the sur-fiice. The laser has sufficient intensity to induce a high degree of nonresonant, and hence nonselective, photoionization of the vaporized sample of material within the laser beam. The nonselectively ionized sample is then subjected to mass spectral analysis to determine the nature of the unknown species. SALI spectra accurately reflect the surface composition, and the use of time-of-flight mass spectrometers provides fast, efficient and extremely sensitive analysis. [Pg.42]

In other articles in this section, a method of analysis is described called Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), in which material is sputtered from a surface using an ion beam and the minor components that are ejected as positive or negative ions are analyzed by a mass spectrometer. Over the past few years, methods that post-ion-ize the major neutral components ejected from surfaces under ion-beam or laser bombardment have been introduced because of the improved quantitative aspects obtainable by analyzing the major ejected channel. These techniques include SALI, Sputter-Initiated Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy (SIRIS), and Sputtered Neutral Mass Spectrometry (SNMS) or electron-gas post-ionization. Post-ionization techniques for surface analysis have received widespread interest because of their increased sensitivity, compared to more traditional surface analysis techniques, such as X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), and their more reliable quantitation, compared to SIMS. [Pg.559]

Figure 1. Three levels of analysis for catalyst materials, a) bulk analysis of an entire catalyst pellet, b) surface analysis and depth profiling from the surface inward, c) analytical electron microscopy of individual catalyst particles too small for analysis by other techniques. Figure 1. Three levels of analysis for catalyst materials, a) bulk analysis of an entire catalyst pellet, b) surface analysis and depth profiling from the surface inward, c) analytical electron microscopy of individual catalyst particles too small for analysis by other techniques.
We shall concern ourselves here with the use of an X-ray probe as a surface analysis technique in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) also known as Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA). High energy photons constitute the XPS probe, which are less damaging than an electron probe, therefore XPS is the favoured technique for the analysis of the surface chemistry of radiation sensitive materials. The X-ray probe has the disadvantage that, unlike an electron beam, it cannot be focussed to permit high spatial resolution imaging of the surface. [Pg.21]

CaTi03 - solution analysis, surface analysis and electron microscope studies - implications for Synroc. In Lutze, W. Ewing, R. C. (eds) Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 127, 231-240. [Pg.110]


See other pages where Electronic materials surface analysis is mentioned: [Pg.23]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.2176]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.115]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.229 ]




SEARCH



Electron analysis

Electron material

Electron surface analysis

Electronic materials

Electronics materials

Material surface

Surface analysis

Surface analysis instrumental, electronic materials

Surface electronic

Surface electrons

© 2024 chempedia.info