Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron from surfaces

VEM excitation energy relaxati( i. Such ways (channels) be probably chemisorption with charge transfer, production of phonons, ejection of electrons from surface states and traps, and the like. The further studies in this field will, obviously, make it possible to give a more complete characteristic of the VEM interaction with the surface of solid bodies and the possibilities of VEM detecting with the aid of semiconductor sensors. [Pg.343]

For recent reviews, see Binder, K.,in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 8 (Ed. C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz), Academic, New York, 1983 H. W. Diehl ibid., Vol. 1, Academic, New York 19 Binder, K., in Polarized Electrons from Surfaces (Ed. R. Feder), World Scientific, Singapore, 1985. [Pg.150]

Fig. 8-31. Transfer reacdons of redox electrons and holes via sin face states (1) exothermic election capture at surface states c d, (2) adiabatic transfer of electrons from surface states to oxidant particles, (3) exothermic hole capture at sui> face states, (4) adiabatic transfer of holes from surface states to reductant particles. Fig. 8-31. Transfer reacdons of redox electrons and holes via sin face states (1) exothermic election capture at surface states c d, (2) adiabatic transfer of electrons from surface states to oxidant particles, (3) exothermic hole capture at sui> face states, (4) adiabatic transfer of holes from surface states to reductant particles.
In general, the activation energy for the release of electrons from surface atoms into the conduction band increases with increasing band gap of the semiconductor electrode with this increase the capture of holes by the surface atoms and radicals predominates. Except for germanium, most covalent semiconductors have been found to dissolve anodically through this valence band mechanism [Memming, 1983]. [Pg.302]

Photoelectron Spectroscopy. As a subdivision of electron spectroscopy, photoelectron or photoemission spectroscopy (PES) includes those instruments that use a photon source to eject electrons from surface atoms. The techniques of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and uv photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) are the principles in this group. Auger electrons are emitted also because of x-ray bombardment, but this combination is used infrequent-... [Pg.393]

Another class of techniques monitors surface vibration frequencies. High-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HREELS) measures the inelastic scattering of low energy ( 5eV) electrons from surfaces. It is sensitive to the vibrational excitation of adsorbed atoms and molecules as well as surface phonons. This is particularly useful for chemisorption systems, allowing the identification of surface species. Application of normal mode analysis and selection rules can determine the point symmetry of the adsorption sites./24/ Infrarred reflectance-adsorption spectroscopy (IRRAS) is also used to study surface systems, although it is not intrinsically surface sensitive. IRRAS is less sensitive than HREELS but has much higher resolution. [Pg.37]

The primary electron beam may also be inelastically scattered through interaction with electrons from surface atoms. In this case, the collision displaces core electrons from filled shells e.g, ns (K) or np (L)) the resulting atom is left as an energetic excited state, with a missing inner shell electron. Since the energies of these secondary electrons are sufficiently low, they must be released from atoms near the surface in order to be detected. Electrons ejected from further within the sample are reabsorbed by the material before they reach the surface. As we will see in the next section (re SEM), as the intensity of the electron beam increases, or the density of the sample decreases, information from underlying portions of the sample may be obtained. [Pg.380]

A series of examples has become known recently, and more are reported in this volume, of catalytic reactions on oxide surfaces, involving electron transfer from reactant molecules to the catalyst, or vice versa. The general electronic concept of catalytic activation, first established for metals and alloys, has thus been extended to semiconductors. It appears certain that mobile quasi-free electrons or positive holes can migrate to the surface and can there bind reactant molecules in a charged or polarized state. This presupposes the presence of electrons in the conduction band (or of holes in the valence band), which in normal oxide semiconductors contains appreciable concentration of electrons only at elevated temperatures. Hence, the examples mentioned refer to high-temperature catalysis (N2O decomposition, CO oxidation). At ordinary temperatures, only those substances capable of releasing electrons from surface atoms or surface bonds, i.e., solid Lewis bases, are suitable as catalysts. This has been shown (I) to be true for the decomposition of ozone by various metal oxides. [Pg.229]

The emission of inner-shell electrons from surface atoms is used for chemical analysis and determination of oxidation states. [Pg.394]

Fig. 8. (a) Decrease of V, during illumination by process (i), excitation of electrons from surface states, and process (ii), excitation to empty states in the space-charge r on and neutralizing surface states by photoexcited boles, (b) Fixed surface charges that cannot be neutralized by illumination. [Pg.326]

J.-L. Calais, O. Goscinski, and E. Poulain Angular Distribution of Photo Electrons from Surfaces (Preprint 1982). [Pg.513]

Electrons, however, do have one advantage. Because they are charged they can be focused by magnetic lenses to form an image. The mechanism of diffraction as an electron beam passes through a thin flake of solid allows defects such as dislocations to be imaged with a resolution close to atomic dimensions. Similarly, diffraction (reflection) of electrons from surfaces of thick solids allows surface details to be recorded, also with a resolution close to atomic scales. Thus although electron diffraction is not widely used in structure determination it is used as an important tool in the exploration of the microstructures and nanostructures of solids. [Pg.127]

There are several different methods to activate a system electrochemically (Lehmann 2002). The most common is anodic etching, which is initiated by the removal of valence electrons from surface bonds of the semiconductor by the application of an external bias in an electrochemical cell. Essentially, the activation barrier toward electron transfer is lowered by shifting the electrochemical potential of the electrons in the Si substrate, which allows the ensuing charge exchange and chemical steps in the etch mechanism to proceed to their thermodynamically favored state. This technique is reviewed elsewhere in this handbook (chapter Porous Silicon Formation by Anodization ). [Pg.574]

Powell and Jablonski [49] have evaluated methods for determining IMFPs and their uncertainties. The following two approaches appear to be the most useful (i) calculation of IMFPs from experimental optical data and (ii) calculation of IMFPs from measured intensities of elastically backscattered electrons from surfaces. In the following paragraphs, a brief summary of these two approaches is given. [Pg.224]

Frequencies associated with infrared radiation, that is, from approximately 3 x 10 to 3 X 10 " Hz, cannot be detected directly by radio frequency techniques. One exception exists in the heterodyne method discussed in Section 5.9, but, in general, infrared frequencies are too high for a direct application of microwave technology. On the other hand, the frequencies and, therefore, the energies of infrared photons are too low to liberate electrons from surfaces by the photoelectric effect. Consequently, standard photomultipliers and all devices based on photoelectric phenomena are also unsuitable as detectors above about 1 m. For all practical purposes only two classes of phenomena provide infrared detection mechanisms. [Pg.253]

In order to shift electrons from surface cations to anions, the cation changes its sp into the planar sp configuration ... [Pg.110]


See other pages where Electron from surfaces is mentioned: [Pg.457]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.203]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.380 ]




SEARCH



Electron diffraction, from surfaces

Electron transfer from metal surfaces

Surface electronic

Surface electrons

© 2024 chempedia.info