Electrochemical methods electron-transfer process

One of the advantages of electrochemical methods over more conventional chemical methods is the fact that the actual electron transfer process can be carried out at an electrode with a far greater degree of control than with a solution reactant. By careful application of the appropriate electrochemical techniques, it is possible to define the sequence of chemical and electron transfer steps in a given electrochemical process with... 

E vs. log(id-i)/f which should be linear with a slope of 59.1/n mV at 25 °C if the wave is reversible. This method relies however upon a prior knowledge of n, and if this is not known then the method is not completely reliable as theory predicts that when the electron transfer process itself is slow, so that equilibrium at the electrode between the oxidized and reduced forms of the couple is established slowly and the Nemst equation cannot be applied, then an irreversible wave is obtained and a similar plot will also yield a straight line but of slope 54.2/ana mV at 25 °C (a = transfer coefficient, i.e. the fraction of the applied potential that influences the rate of the electrochemical reaction, usually cu. 0.5 na = the number of electrons transferred in the rate-determining step). Thus a slope of 59.1 mV at 25 °C could be interpreted either as a reversible one-electron process or an irreversible two-electron process with a = 0.45. If the wave is irreversible in DC polarography then it is not possible to obtain the redox potential of the couple. 

The electrochemical formation of a radical ion from an aromatic compound or other highly conjugated species is, generally, fast and, therefore, the kinetics of the heterogeneous electron transfer process usually do not interfere with the kinetics of the follow-up reactions to be studied. For species with only one or two double bonds, the initial electron transfer process is often slow and may even be rate determining. In such cases, the kinetics of the follow-up reactions may be studied only with some difficulty. One method is to use a so-called mediator (Med) which serves to shuttle electrons between the substrate and the electrode. Thus, the slow electron transfer between the substrate and the electrode is replaced by two fast electron transfer processes, between the mediator and the electrode, and between the oxidised or reduced mediator and the substrate. In this event, the single reaction of Equation 6.4 is replaced by the two reactions in Scheme 6.8 [32 ]. It is seen that the mediator is recycled and consequently needs be present in only small, non-stoichiometric amounts. 

The fact that electrochemical processes are tied to electron transfer processes makes electrochemical methods generally less applicable for kinetics and mechanism studies than, for instance, spectroscopic methods. On the other hand, if the reaction under scrutiny involves a radical or radical-like species, electrochemical methods are invaluable tools that often provide a wealth of mechanistic detail. A major advantage of electrochemical methods for kinetics and mechanism studies is that intermediates (radical ions, radicals, etc.) may be formed and their chemical reactions studied at the same electrode in the same operation. 

The application of electrochemical methods for the study of the kinetics and mechanisms of reactions of electro chemically generated intermediates is intimately related to the thermodynamics and kinetics of the heterogeneous electron transfer process and to the mode of transport of material to and from the working electrode. For that reason, we review below some basics, including the relationship between potential and current (Section 6.5.1), the electrochemical double layer and the double layer charging current (Section 6.5.2), and the... 

Cyclic voltammetry is one of the most reliable electrochemical approaches to elucidate the nature of electrochemical processes, and to provide insights into the nature of processes beyond the electron-transfer reaction. Several investigations27-29 have extended this method to the study of the chemical kinetics for chemical processes that precede or follow the electron-transfer process, as well as for the study of various adsorption effects that occur at the electrode surface. However, these are sufficiently complicated that those interested should consult the original papers or recent reviews.13,14 30"38 Some simple, general cases are discussed in this chapter, and other examples are included in later chapters. 

As outlined in the theoretical section of this chapter, controlled-potential methods have extensive application in the study of the kinetics and mechanisms of the electron-transfer reaction of electrochemical processes. Furthermore, associated reactions before and after the electron-transfer process are readily studied by controlled-potential methods. For a number of systems the rate constants for these associated chemical processes can be evaluated. 

The time range of the electrochemical measurements has been decreased considerably by using more powerful -> potentiostats, circuitry, -> microelectrodes, etc. by pulse techniques, fast -> cyclic voltammetry, -> scanning electrochemical microscopy the 10-6-10-1° s range has become available [iv,v]. The electrochemical techniques have been combined with spectroscopic ones (see -> spectroelectrochemistry) which have successfully been applied for relaxation studies [vi]. For the study of the rate of heterogeneous -> electron transfer processes the ILIT (Indirect Laser Induced Temperature) method has been developed [vi]. It applies a small temperature perturbation, e.g., of 5 K, and the change of the open-circuit potential is followed during the relaxation period. By this method a response function of the order of 1-10 ns has been achieved. 

There are several disadvantages to potential sweep methods. First, it is difficult to measure multiple, closely spaced redox couples. This lack of resolution is due to the broad asymmetric nature of the oxidation/reduction waves. In addition, the analyte must be relatively concentrated as compared to other electrochemical techniques to obtain measurable data with good signal to noise. This decreased sensitivity is due to a relatively high capacitance current which is a result of ramping the potential linearly with time. Potential sweep methods are easy to perform and provide valuable insight into the electron transfer processes. They are excellent for providing a preliminary evalnation, bnt are best combined with other complementary electrochemical techniqnes. 

Electron-transfer processes can give rise to substitution-labile 17-electron complexes . A 17-electron species prepared by electrochemical methods favors CO reaction with ( -Cp)2TiCl2. Electron-transfer catalysis has been proposed for the conversion of FcjfCO), 2 to FefCO) . A possibly related process is the transformation of Rh4(CO), 2 into [Rh(CO)4] under syngas pressure. This may be an important step in the synthesis of ethylene glycol from CO and H2. 

In general, the electrochemical oxidation potentials of carbonyl compounds are very high (Table 6) and oxidative activation of aliphatic or aromatic carbonyl compounds is problematic whether by anodic oxidation or by photochemical methods. Oxidation at very high positive potentials is circumvented by at least three chemical modifications of the carbonyl group which enable the subsequent oxidation by chemical, electrochemical, or photoinduced electron-transfer processes. 

Shortly after Chidsey and co-workers initial papers. Miller et al. reported full characterization of Au-S(CH2) OH monolayers (System 5, = 6-12, 14, 16) by ellipsometry, XPS and electrochemical methods [44]. The nearly defect-free nature of the monolayers was attributed to hydrogen-bonding interactions between neighboring adsorbate chains at the film-electrolyte interface. The level of defects was probed by varying bridging halides, which should change electron-transfer processes at pinholes from outer to inner sphere. Electrochemical annealing was found to improve the EBE [44]. Later, they showed that defects in the SAMs are on the... 

This chapter is meant to serve both as a guide for the beginner and as an overview for the nonelectrochemist with a need to know the methods available. Approximately half of the chapter is concerned with various aspects of linear sweep and cyclic voltammetry in view of the importance and widespread use of these techniques. Some general aspects of the heterogeneous electron transfer process, and the chemical reactions associated with it, are introduced in this part. Electrochemical reactions in which the electroactive substrate is formed in a chemical reaction in solution prior to the electron transfer [1-5] and catalysis of chemical reactions by electron transfer [6] are not included in this chapter. The reader interested in the details of such reactions should consult the presentations referred to. The reader is encouraged also to consult Chapter 1, where a number of basic electrochemical concepts are discussed in detail. 

The intensive electrochemical studies of polycyclic systems, especially cyclic volta-metry (CV) are now at a stage which justifies naming cyclic voltametry an electrochemical spectroscopy as was suggested by Heinze 65). Early electrochemical studies referred only to the thermodynamic parameters while CV studies provide direct insight into the kinetics of electrode reactions. These include both heterogeneous and homogeneous electron-transfer steps, as well as chemical reactions which are coupled with the electrochemical process. The kinetic analysis enables the determination of reactive intermediates in the same sense as spectroscopic methods do. As already mentioned, electron transfer processes occur in both the electrochemical and metal reduction reactions. 

The essential parameters which determine the electrochemical process are the electron affinity of the neutral compound, which correlates with the energy of the LUMO, the energies of interaction with the solvent and counterions, the electron-electron repulsion energies and stereochemical factors. A precondition for an electrochemical study is that the chemical reaction which may occur, e.g. with the solvent, is much slower than the electron transfer process, and that the electrochemical reaction is reversible 66). Correlation of half-wave potentials with the energies of Huckel LUMO s has been one of the early successes of the Huckel model 8>2°.67-88>. The power of the electrochemical method in the study of polycyclic anions has been demonstrated recently 69a). Studies on reactions occurring during electrochemical reductions report reductive alkylations of polycyclic systems and their mechanism 70,69b). 

Electrochemical detectors were reported used by 21% of the respondents to the detector survey (47). Electron transfer processes offer highly sensitive and selective methods for detection of solutes. Various techniques have been devised for this measurement process, with the most popular being based on the application of a fixed potential to a solid electrode. Potential pulse techniques, scanning techniques, and multiple electrode techniques have all been employed and can offer certain advantages. Two excellent reviews of electrochemical detection in flowing streams have appeared (59,60), as well as a comprehensive chapter in a series on liquid chromatography (61). 

By far the most popular of the electrochemical detection techniques is am-perometric detection. Here a fixed potential is applied to the electrode, most often glassy carbon, and a solute which will oxidize (or reduce) at that potential yields an output current. Very little of the solute species, often less than 10%, is involved in the actual electron transfer process. A second method is coulometric detection. Here 100% of the solute species is converted, which offers advantages of no mobile-phase flow dependence on the signal and absolute quantitation through Faraday s law, but a large-area electrode must be used. This then makes the electrode much more susceptible to fouling, and offers no improvement in signal-... 

Numerous electrochemical measurements have been carried out with the ruthenium diimin complexes [15], mainly with the aim of comparing electron-transfer processes in the ground and in the excited state, and for the determination of the character of the frontier orbitals. Much less data are known for the cyclometallated analogs. By far the most popular method for the electrochemical measurements is cyclic voltammetry (CV). The measurements are mostly done in nonaqueous solutions (acetonitrile, dimethylfor-mamide, etc.). A general difficulty in such measurements is the reference potential, and the use of an internal standard like, for example, Ru(bpy)2 + is therefore highly recommended. Table 1 contains a compilation of electrode potentials of cyclometallated complexes of the type considered in this review. For comparison, the values of Ru(bpy) + are included in the table. 

The available results demonstrate readily the complementarity of the kinetic and thermodynamic data obtained from stopped-flow, UV-Vis, electrochemical and density measurements, and yield a mutually consistent set of trends allowing further interpretation of the data. The overall reaction volumes determined in four different ways are surprisingly similar and underline the validity of the different methods employed. The volume profile in Fig. 1.20 illustrates the symmetric nature of the intrinsic and solvational reorganization in order to reach the transition state of the electron-transfer process. In these systems the volume profile is controlled by effects on the redox parmer of cytochrome c, but this does not necessarily always have to be the case. The location of the transition state on a volume basis is informative regarding the early or late nature of the transition state, and therefore details of the actual electron-transfer route followed. 

---