Potential-sweep method

Potential Sweep Method, In the transient techniques described above, a set of measurements of the potential for a given current or the current for a given potential is measured in order to construct the current-potential function, i = f(E). For example, the Tafel lines shown in Figure 6.20 were constructed from a set of galvanostatic transients of the type shown in Figure 6.18. In the potential sweep technique, i = f(E), curves are recorded directly in a single experiment. This is achieved by sweeping the potential with time. In linear sweep voltammetry, the potential of the test electrode is varied linearly with time (Fig. 6.23a). If the sweep rate is... 

A cell with a capacity of 1 L was made of mild steel. An amorphous carbon rod (diameter 25 mm length 15 cm) was used as anode, the inside wall of the cell as cathode and a platinum wire was used as reference electrode. The anode compartment of the cell was separated from the cathode compartment by a skirt of steel welded to the cell cover. The anode gas was passed through a tube filled with tablets of NaF to absorb anhyd HF gas and then led to a gas sampler. Fluorine was detected with K.I soln. After the starting material was added into the molten KIIF2/HF salt, the electrolyte was pre-electrolyzed at a low current density until NF2 was detected, and then current efficiency of each product and polarization curves by galvanostatic or potential sweep method were determined (Table 1). At optimum conditions the current efficiency of NF3 was 55%. 

Again, application of the principle to the simple potential-step method appears trivial or superfluous. However, it is of quite great important for other types of potential control, namely double potential step, cyclic potential step [73], and especially the linear potential sweep method [21, 22, 73]. In all these techniques, sets of data Jf ( ) /f (f) E can be obtained, thus enabling kt(E) to be determined from eqn. (100). For more details, the reader is referred to the quoted textbooks. 

In a vessel for electrolysis three parallel nickel plates were installed. The inner nickel plate was the working electrode (anode), and the two outer nickel plates were counter electrodes (cathode). A 1.2 liter mixture consisting of fluorene (0.01 mol) and LiPFs (0.1 mol) dissolved in propylene carbonate were then added to the vessel. The three nickel plates were immersed in the mixture to a depth of 90 mm. Two lithium metal sheets were used as reference electrodes, with each sheet placed between the anode and the cathode. The electrolysis was carried out by a potential-sweep method for 4 hours under a potential width of 4.5 to 6.7 V with a sweep time of 50 mV/s. The inner... 

The scan rate is an important parameter for potential sweep methods such as CV or LSV The current is proportional to the square root of the scan rate in all electrochemical systems—irreversible, reversible, and quasi-reversible systems. Figure 4.4 shows the LSV for EMI—TFSl using a glassy carbon (GC) [49]. Note in this figure... 

Of the potential sweep methods, polarography at the dropping mercury electrode occupies a special position in that the early work using this technique provided the foundations upon which most of the modern techniques are based. The method involves low potential sweep rates (less than 10 mV s ) and the recording of current-potential curves. The most pertinent data features are the limiting currents (ii) and the half-wave potential (E ) designated in Fig. 1. While the use of polarography has diminished in recent years due to... 

Potential sweep methods which vary potential and measure current are widely used as they are easy techniques to employ. The methods include linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and CV which can yield a large amount of electrochemical data in a short amount of time. These potential sweep methods are commonly used by inorganic chemists due to their ease of use and the information obtained. CV has appeared in the literature as the most popular electrochemical technique among inorganic chemists over the past three decades. Another advantage to potential sweep methods is that instrumentation is widely available at relatively low cost. Potential sweep methods usually involve varying the potential... 

Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), also known as linear sweep chronoamperometry, is a potential sweep method where the applied potential (E) is ramped in a linear fashion while measming cnrrent (i). LSV is the simplest technique that uses this waveform. The potential range that is scanned begins at an initial or start potential and ends at a final potential. It is best to start the scan at rest potential, the potential of zero current. For a reversible couple, the peak potential can be calcnlated nsing equation (6). ... 

There are several disadvantages to potential sweep methods. First, it is difficult to measure multiple, closely spaced redox couples. This lack of resolution is due to the broad asymmetric nature of the oxidation/reduction waves. In addition, the analyte must be relatively concentrated as compared to other electrochemical techniques to obtain measurable data with good signal to noise. This decreased sensitivity is due to a relatively high capacitance current which is a result of ramping the potential linearly with time. Potential sweep methods are easy to perform and provide valuable insight into the electron transfer processes. They are excellent for providing a preliminary evalnation, bnt are best combined with other complementary electrochemical techniqnes. 

Potential step methods have emerged as valuable electrochemical methods due to the highly sensitive nature of the technique. The waveform employed in potential step methods, also referred to as pulsed methods, have some advantages over potential sweep methods. The main advantage is that the steplike waveform can discriminate and separate the capacitive current versus the faradaic current, the current due to the reduction or oxidation undergone by the analyte, increasing signal to noise. Capacitive versus faradaic current discrimination is the basis for all of the pulsed techniques. The rate of decay of the capacitive current and the faradaic current is not the same. The capacitive current has an exponential decay whereas the faradaic current decays as a function of t Since the rate of decay of the capacitive current is much... 

An interesting point to consider is the effect of surface roughness on the range of applicability of the linear potential sweep method. The... 

Uses and Limitations of the Linear Potential Sweep Method... 

A similar situation arises in the application of the linear potential sweep method, to be discussed. In this case a potential that varies linearly with time is applied by the potentiostat. A typical... 

One could use the equation of chronopotentiometry under irreversible conditions (Eq. 5IK) to determine the transfer coefficient from a plot of E versus ln(x - t ), but again, the uncertainly in the determination of x makes this method less reliable than other similar techniques, such as the linear potential sweep method which will be discussed below. 

Reductive removal of these oxygen layers is a slow kinetic process, commencing at potentials well below the characteristic potential for the layer formation on each metal. Thus, adsorption results based on the commonly used triangular potential sweep method can depend on the anodic potential excursions, the frequency of potential cycling and the number of cycles, that is, the catalyst surface history. Similarly, kinetic studies of oxygen reduction can be influenced by the dependence of the oxygen layer formation... 

---