Electrostatic models electric double layer

The deviations from the Szyszkowski-Langmuir adsorption theory have led to the proposal of a munber of models for the equihbrium adsorption of surfactants at the gas-Uquid interface. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the theories and assess their applicabihty to the adsorption of both ionic and nonionic surfactants at the gas-hquid interface. The thermodynamic approach of Butler [14] and the Lucassen-Reynders dividing surface [15] will be used to describe the adsorption layer state and adsorption isotherm as a function of partial molecular area for adsorbed nonionic surfactants. The traditional approach with the Gibbs dividing surface and Gibbs adsorption isotherm, and the Gouy-Chapman electrical double layer electrostatics will be used to describe the adsorption of ionic surfactants and ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. The fimdamental modeling of the adsorption processes and the molecular interactions in the adsorption layers will be developed to predict the parameters of the proposed models and improve the adsorption models for ionic surfactants. Finally, experimental data for surface tension will be used to validate the proposed adsorption models. 

At present it is impossible to formulate an exact theory of the structure of the electrical double layer, even in the simple case where no specific adsorption occurs. This is partly because of the lack of experimental data (e.g. on the permittivity in electric fields of up to 109 V m"1) and partly because even the largest computers are incapable of carrying out such a task. The analysis of a system where an electrically charged metal in which the positions of the ions in the lattice are known (the situation is more complicated with liquid metals) is in contact with an electrolyte solution should include the effect of the electrical field on the permittivity of the solvent, its structure and electrolyte ion concentrations in the vicinity of the interface, and, at the same time, the effect of varying ion concentrations on the structure and the permittivity of the solvent. Because of the unsolved difficulties in the solution of this problem, simplifying models must be employed the electrical double layer is divided into three regions that interact only electrostatically, i.e. the electrode itself, the compact layer and the diffuse layer. 

The description of the sorption of charged molecules at a charged interface includes an electrostatic term, which is dependent upon the interfacial potential difference, Ai//(V). This term is in turn related to the surface charge density, electric double layer model. The surface charge density is calculated from the concentrations of charged molecules at the interface under the assumption that the membrane itself has a net zero charge, as is the case, for example, for membranes constructed from the zwitterionic lecithin. Moreover,... 

As we have seen, the electric state of a surface depends on the spatial distribution of free (electronic or ionic) charges in its neighborhood. The distribution is usually idealized as an electric double layer one layer is envisaged as a fixed charge or surface charge attached to the particle or solid surface while the other is distributed more or less diffusively in the liquid in contact (Gouy-Chapman diffuse model, Fig. 3.2). A balance between electrostatic and thermal forces is attained. 

The main, currently used, surface complexation models (SCMs) are the constant capacitance, the diffuse double layer (DDL) or two layer, the triple layer, the four layer and the CD-MUSIC models. These models differ mainly in their descriptions of the electrical double layer at the oxide/solution interface and, in particular, in the locations of the various adsorbing species. As a result, the electrostatic equations which are used to relate surface potential to surface charge, i. e. the way the free energy of adsorption is divided into its chemical and electrostatic components, are different for each model. A further difference is the method by which the weakly bound (non specifically adsorbing see below) ions are treated. The CD-MUSIC model differs from all the others in that it attempts to take into account the nature and arrangement of the surface functional groups of the adsorbent. These models, which are fully described in a number of reviews (Westall and Hohl, 1980 Westall, 1986, 1987 James and Parks, 1982 Sparks, 1986 Schindler and Stumm, 1987 Davis and Kent, 1990 Hiemstra and Van Riemsdijk, 1996 Venema et al., 1996) are summarised here. 

Reversed-phase chromatography is often used to separate both neutral and ionic organic compounds. In this section, some important aspects for the understanding of the behavior of ionic compounds in reversed-phase chromatography are discussed. The important concepts introduced here are the electrical double layer and the electrostatic surface potential. It will be shown that they are essential for the understanding of the elution profile of ionic compounds. These concepts are further explored in the next section where theoretical models for ion-pair chromatography are discussed. 

Retention of proteins in ion exchange chromatography is mainly caused by electrostatic effects. Because both the protein and the surface have an electrical double layer associated to it, there is an increase in entropy when the two surfaces approach each other. This is due to a release of counter ions from the two double layers when they overlap. The model that is discussed here is based on a solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann for two oppositely charged planar surfaces. We also show the result from a model where the protein is considered as a sphere and the... 

What is next Several examples were given of modem experimental electrochemical techniques used to characterize electrode-electrolyte interactions. However, we did not mention theoretical methods used for the same purpose. Computer simulations of the dynamic processes occurring in the double layer are found abundantly in the literature of electrochemistry. Examples of topics explored in this area are investigation of lateral adsorbate-adsorbate interactions by the formulation of lattice-gas models and their solution by analytical and numerical techniques (Monte Carlo simulations) [Fig. 6.107(a)] determination of potential-energy curves for metal-ion and lateral-lateral interaction by quantum-chemical studies [Fig. 6.107(b)] and calculation of the electrostatic field and potential drop across an electric double layer by molecular dynamic simulations [Fig. 6.107(c)]. 

The interphase between an electrolyte solution and an electrode has become known as the electrical double layer. It was recognized early that the interphase behaves like a capacitor in its ability to store charge. Helmholtz therefore proposed a simple electrostatic model of the interphase based on charge separation across a constant distance as illustrated in Figure 2.12. This parallel-plate capacitor model survives principally in the use of the term double layer to describe a situation that is quite obviously far more complex. Helmholtz was unable to account for the experimentally observed potential dependence and ionic strength dependence of the capacitance. For an ideal capacitor, Q = CV, and the capacitance C is not a function of V. 

An alternative to integral equation theories of the nonprimitive inhomogeneous electric double layer is a mean electrostatic field analysis of an ion-solvent dipole mixture against a charged wall [83-90]. Although this approach has been successful with the primitive model and avoids the difficult problem with the bridge function, it is still in the early stages of development with the nonprimitive electric double layer model. 

Poisson-Boltzmann equation — The Poisson-Boltz-mann equation is a nonlinear, elliptic, second-order, partial differential equation which plays a central role, e.g., in the Gouy-Chapman (- Gouy, - Chapman) electrical -> double layer model and in the - Debye-Huckel theory of electrolyte solutions. It is derived from the classical -> Poisson equation for the electrostatic potential... 

This ion interaction retention model of IPC emphasized the role played by the electrical double layer in enhancing analyte retention even if retention modeling was only qualitatively attempted. It was soon realized that the analyte transfer through an electrified interface could not be properly described without dealing with electrochemical potentials. An important drawback shared by all stoichiometric models was neglecting the establishment of the stationary phase electrostatic potential. It is important to note that not even the most recent stoichiometric comprehensive models for both classical [17] and neoteric [18] IPRs can give a true description of the retention mechanism because stoichiometric constants are not actually constant in the presence of a stationary phase-bulk eluent electrified interface [19,20], These observations led to the development of non-stoichiometric models of IPC. Since stoichiometric models are not well founded in physical chemistry, in the interest of brevity they will not be described in more depth. 

Cantwell and co-workers submitted the second genuine electrostatic model the theory is reviewed in Reference 29 and described as a surface adsorption, diffuse layer ion exchange double layer model. The description of the electrical double layer adopted the Stem-Gouy-Chapman (SGC) version of the theory [30]. The role of the diffuse part of the double layer in enhancing retention was emphasized by assigning a stoichiometric constant for the exchange of the solute ion between the bulk of the mobile phase and the diffuse layer. However, the impact of the diffuse layer on organic ion retention was danonstrated to be residual [19],... 

If the crucial drawback of stoichiometric models is neglect of the demonstrated development of the electrical double layer, a serious setback of electrostatic models is ignoring the experimental proof [34-48] of the formation of chemical complexes between oppositely charged analyte and IPR, discussed in detail in Chapter 2.5.3. In a landmark paper related to theoretical modeling of ion-pairing, Popa and co-woikers intensively studied ion-pairing in the CE separation of diastereomeric peptide pairs... 

In Chapter 1, we have discussed the potential and charge of hard particles, which colloidal particles play a fundamental role in their interfacial electric phenomena such as electrostatic interaction between them and their motion in an electric field [1 ]. In this chapter, we focus on the case where the particle core is covered by an ion-penetrable surface layer of polyelectrolytes, which we term a surface charge layer (or, simply, a surface layer). Polyelectrolyte-coated particles are often called soft particles [3-16]. It is shown that the Donnan potential plays an important role in determining the potential distribution across a surface charge layer. Soft particles serve as a model for biocolloids such as cells. In such cases, the electrical double layer is formed not only outside but also inside the surface charge layer Figure 4.1 shows schematic representation of ion and potential distributions around a hard surface (Fig. 4.1a) and a soft surface (Fig. 4.1b). 

The inner layer is a concept within the framework of the classical Gouy-Chap-man-Stern model of the double layer [57]. Recent statistical-mechanical treatments of electrical double layers taking account of solvent dipoles has revealed a microscopic structure of inner layer" and other intriguing features, including pronounced oscillation of the mean electrostatic potential in the vicinity of the interface and its insensitivity at the interface to changes in the salt concentration [65-69]. 

The DLVO theory, which was developed independently by Derjaguin and Landau and by Verwey and Overbeek to analyze quantitatively the influence of electrostatic forces on the stability of lyophobic colloidal particles, has been adapted to describe the influence of similar forces on the flocculation and stability of simple model emulsions stabilized by ionic emulsifiers. The charge on the surface of emulsion droplets arises from ionization of the hydrophilic part of the adsorbed surfactant and gives rise to electrical double layers. Theoretical equations, which were originally developed to deal with monodispersed inorganic solids of diameters less than 1 pm, have to be extensively modified when applied to even the simplest of emulsions, because the adsorbed emulsifier is of finite thickness and droplets, unlike solids, can deform and coalesce. Washington has pointed out that in lipid emulsions, an additional repulsive force not considered by the theory due to the solvent at close distances is also important. 

Several SCM s have been described in the literature. The more commonly used models include the Constant Capacitance Model (Schindler and Stumm, 1987), the Diffuse Double Layer Model (Stumm et al., 1970) and the Triple Layer Model (Davis et al., 1978 Yates et al, 1974). All are based on electric double layer theory but differ in their geometric description of the oxide-water interface and the treatment of the electrostatic interactions. 

---