Drinking water with iron

The removal of residual chlorite from drinking water with iron(II) under slightly acidic conditions proved to be the best way. The molar stoichiometry, based on Eq. (8.43), predicts that 3.3 mg of Fe(II) would be required to completely reduce 1 mg chlorite [67]. 

Hgure 6 ESR spectra of liver tissue from mice at 77 K (A) control animal on normal diet (B) mouse on drinking water with 0.3% nitrite for 7 days. The nitrite consumption induces formation of dinitrosyl-iron (DNIC 0.03) and nitrosyl-heme complexes, at g=1.98. (Reproduced with permission from Varich V (1979) Changes in amounts of dinitrosyl non-heme iron complexes in animal tissues depending on animal growth. Biofyzika (Russian) 24 344-347.)... 

Drinking water suppHed to carbonated soft drink manufacturing faciUties from private or municipal sources must comply with all regulatory requirements. Treated water must meet all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency primary maximum contaminant levels and may also be subject to additional state requirements. Treated water is routinely analyzed for taste, odor, appearance, chlorine, alkalinity, iron, pH, total dissolved soHds, hardness, and microbiological contamination. 

Whereas studies have been carried out on the factors (surface coverage, residence time, pH) which influence the desorption of arsenate previously sorbed onto oxides, phyllosilicates and soils (O Reilly et al. 2001 Liu et al. 2001 Arai and Sparks 2002 Violante and Pigna 2002 Pigna et al. 2006), scant information are available on the possible desorption of arsenate coprecipitated with iron or aluminum. In natural environments arsenic may form precipitates or coprecipitates with Al, Fe, Mn and Ca. Coprecipitation of arsenic with iron and aluminum are practical and effective treatment processes for removing arsenic from drinking waters and might be as important as sorption to preformed solids. 

Hepatic Effects. An increase in serum iron, which may reflect an adverse liver effect, was observed in workers exposed for 6 months to phenol in a wood treatment liquid (Baj et al. 1994). Elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes in serum, and an enlarged and tender liver suggestive of liver injury, were reported in an individual who had been exposed repeatedly to phenol vapor for 13.5 years (Merliss 1972). Since phenol was also spilled on his clothes resulting in skin irritation, dermal and inhalation exposures were involved. A 2-fold increase in serum bilirubin was observed in a man who was accidentally splashed with a phenol solution over his face, chest wall, hand, and both arms (Horch et al. 1994). Changes in liver enzymes were not observed in persons exposed to phenol in drinking water for several weeks after an accidental spill (Baker et al. 1978). This study is not conclusive because the measurements were completed 7 months after the exposure. 

The impact to health has been mostly dependent on the concentration of the candidate metal. Some metals (e.g., mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium, iron, copper) ultimately find their way into human systems via soil, minerals, and water. Studies have shown the presence of many metals in daily consumable products (e.g., food, fruits, milk, fabric materials, drinking water). Further, heavy metals associated with particle material can be accumulated in areas suitable for sedimentation or particle concentration (e.g., upstream from sills or dams, in estuary sludge clog, etc.). These accumulation areas are creating possible pollution sources, as particles pooled could be resuspended during punctual hydrologic periods (floods, drains). Bioavailability, and therefore toxicity of heavy metals, is strongly bound to the current chemical form. 

EC is a simple, efficient, and promising method to remove arsenic form water. Arsenic removal efficiencies with different electrode materials follow the sequence iron > titanium > aluminum. The process was able to remove more than 99% of arsenic from an As-contaminated water and met the drinking water standard of 10p,gL 1 with iron electrode. Compared with the iron electrodes, aluminum electrodes obtained lower removal efficiency. The plausible reason for less arsenic removal by aluminum in comparison to iron could be that the adsorption capacity of hydrous aluminum oxide for As(III) is much lower in comparison to hydrous ferric oxides. Comparative evaluation of As(III) and As(V) removal by chemical coagulation (with ferric chloride) and electrocoagulation has been done. The comparison revealed that EC has better removal efficiency for As(ni), whereas As(V) removal by both processes was nearly same (Kumar et al. 2004). 

Microinjection of ferrous iron (i.e. ferrous chloride) has also been shown to produce focal edema in rat brain, the degree of which is correlated with tissue levels of the lipid-peroxidation product malonyldialdehyde. Pretreatment with vitamin E (600 mg/kg intramuscularly once daily for 5 days) together with selenium (5 ppm in the drinking water) reduced the iron-induced edema and lipid peroxidation [54]. Similarly, the 21-aminosteroid U-74006F can also reduce iron-induced opening of the blood-brain barrier [53],... 

---