Disperse molecular interactions

A general formula for calculation of the dispersion molecular interactions in any type of condensed phases has been proposed in [148], The attraction between bodies results from the existence of fluctuational electromagnetic field of the substance. If this field is known in a thin film, then it is possible to determine the disjoining pressure in it. The more strict macroscopic theory avoids the approximations assumed in the microscopic theory, i.e. additivity of forces integration extrapolation of interactions of individual molecules in the gas to interactions in condensed phase. The following function for IIvw was derived in [148] for thick free films... 

Abstract We are definitely witnessing an ever-increasing need to study dispersion molecular interactions that govern a weakly bound molecular world within the density functional theory. This chapter outlines the basic approaches currently undertaken to resolve this density functional paradigm. 

Knowles P J and Meath W J 1986 Non-expanded dispersion and induction energies, and damping functions, for molecular interactions with application to HP.. . He Mol. Phys. 59 965... 

When a gas comes in contact with a solid surface, under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure, the concentration of the gas (the adsorbate) is always found to be greater near the surface (the adsorbent) than in the bulk of the gas phase. This process is known as adsorption. In all solids, the surface atoms are influenced by unbalanced attractive forces normal to the surface plane adsorption of gas molecules at the interface partially restores the balance of forces. Adsorption is spontaneous and is accompanied by a decrease in the free energy of the system. In the gas phase the adsorbate has three degrees of freedom in the adsorbed phase it has only two. This decrease in entropy means that the adsorption process is always exothermic. Adsorption may be either physical or chemical in nature. In the former, the process is dominated by molecular interaction forces, e.g., van der Waals and dispersion forces. The formation of the physically adsorbed layer is analogous to the condensation of a vapor into a liquid in fret, the heat of adsorption for this process is similar to that of liquefoction. 

Alhedai et al also examined the exclusion properties of a reversed phase material The stationary phase chosen was a Cg hydrocarbon bonded to the silica, and the mobile phase chosen was 2-octane. As the solutes, solvent and stationary phase were all dispersive (hydrophobic in character) and both the stationary phase and the mobile phase contained Cg interacting moieties, the solute would experience the same interactions in both phases. Thus, any differential retention would be solely due to exclusion and not due to molecular interactions. This could be confirmed by carrying out the experiments at two different temperatures. If any interactive mechanism was present that caused retention, then different retention volumes would be obtained for the same solute at different temperatures. Solutes ranging from n-hexane to n hexatriacontane were chromatographed at 30°C and 50°C respectively. The results obtained are shown in Figure 8. 

Molecular interactions are the result of intermolecular forces which are all electrical in nature. It is possible that other forces may be present, such as gravitational and magnetic forces, but these are many orders of magnitude weaker than the electrical forces and play little or no part in solute retention. It must be emphasized that there are three, and only three, different basic types of intermolecular forces, dispersion forces, polar forces and ionic forces. All molecular interactions must be composites of these three basic molecular forces although, individually, they can vary widely in strength. In some instances, different terms have been introduced to describe one particular force which is based not on the type of force but on the strength of the force. Fundamentally, however, there are only three basic types of molecular force. 

Dispersion forces are ubiquitous and are present in all molecular interactions. They can occur in isolation, but are always present even when other types of interaction dominate. Typically, the interactions between hydrocarbons are exclusively dispersive and, because of them, hexane, at S.T.P., is a liquid boiling at 68.7°C and is not a gas. Dispersive interactions are sometimes referred to as hydrophobic or lyophobic particularly in the fields of biotechnology and biochemistry. These terms appear to have arisen because dispersive substances, e.g., the aliphatic hydrocarbons, do not dissolve readily in water. Biochemical terms for molecular interactions in relation to the physical chemical terms will be discussed later. 

The theory of molecular interactions can become extremely involved and the mathematical manipulations very unwieldy. To facilitate the discussion, certain simplifying assumptions will be made. These assumptions will be inexact and the expressions given for both dispersive and polar forces will not be precise. However, they will be reasonably accurate and sufficiently so, to reveal those variables that control the different types of interaction. At a first approximation, the interaction energy, (Ud), involved with dispersive forces has been calculated to be... 

The dipoles are shown interacting directly as would be expected. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that behind the dipole-dipole interactions will be dispersive interactions from the random charge fluctuations that continuously take place on both molecules. In the example given above, the net molecular interaction will be a combination of both dispersive interactions from the fluctuating random charges and polar interactions from forces between the two dipoles. Examples of substances that contain permanent dipoles and can exhibit polar interactions with other molecules are alcohols, esters, ethers, amines, amides, nitriles, etc. 

Finally, a fourth motivation for exploring gas solubilities in ILs is that they can act as probes of the molecular interactions with the ILs. Information can be discerned on the importance of specific chemical interactions such as hydrogen bonding, as well as dipole-dipole, dipole-induced dipole, and dispersion forces. Of course, this information can be determined from the solubility of a series of carefully chosen liquids, as well. FLowever, gases tend to be of the smallest size, and therefore the simplest molecules with which to probe molecular interactions. 

The effect of molecular interactions on the distribution coefficient of a solute has already been mentioned in Chapter 1. Molecular interactions are the direct effect of intermolecular forces between the solute and solvent molecules and the nature of these molecular forces will now be discussed in some detail. There are basically four types of molecular forces that can control the distribution coefficient of a solute between two phases. They are chemical forces, ionic forces, polar forces and dispersive forces. Hydrogen bonding is another type of molecular force that has been proposed, but for simplicity in this discussion, hydrogen bonding will be considered as the result of very strong polar forces. These four types of molecular forces that can occur between the solute and the two phases are those that the analyst must modify by choice of the phase system to achieve the necessary separation. Consequently, each type of molecular force enjoins some discussion. 

It was explained in the previous chapter that solute retention and, consequently, solute selectivity is accomplished in an LC column by exploiting three basic and different types of molecular interactions in the stationary phase those interactions were described as ionic, polar and dispersive. 

Interactive LC systems are those where solute retention is predominantly controlled by the relative strengths of the molecular interactions between solute molecules with those of the two phases. In such systems, exclusion and entropically driven interactions will be minor contributions to retention. The three basically different types of molecular interaction, dispersive, polar and ionic give rise to three subgroups, each subgroup representing a separation where one specific type of interaction dominates in the stationary phase and thus governs solute retention. The subgroups are as follows ... 

H-bonding is an important, but not the sole, interatomic interaction. Thus, total energy is usually calculated as the sum of steric, electrostatic, H-bonding and other components of interatomic interactions. A similar situation holds with QSAR studies of any property (activity) where H-bond parameters are used in combination with other descriptors. For example, five molecular descriptors are applied in the solvation equation of Kamlet-Taft-Abraham excess of molecular refraction (Rj), which models dispersion force interactions arising from the polarizability of n- and n-electrons the solute polarity/polarizability (ir ) due to solute-solvent interactions between bond dipoles and induced dipoles overall or summation H-bond acidity (2a ) overall or summation H-bond basicity (2(3 ) and McGowan volume (VJ [53] ... 

From the viewpoint of molecular interactions, the number of fundamentally distinct chromatographic stationary phases is very limited.17 One mechanism for adsorption to the stationary phase is solvophobic, or mobilestationary phase transfer free energy effects, in which the adsorption of an analyte to the stationary phase liberates bound solvent. There is often an accompanying enthalpic component to such binding through dispersion interactions. Another mechanism for adsorption is that of specific interactions,... 

The selection of the solvent is based on the retention mechanism. The retention of analytes on stationary phase material is based on the physicochemical interactions. The molecular interactions in thin-layer chromatography have been extensively discussed, and are related to the solubility of solutes in the solvent. The solubility is explained as the sum of the London dispersion (van der Waals force for non-polar molecules), repulsion, Coulombic forces (compounds form a complex by ion-ion interaction, e.g. ionic crystals dissolve in solvents with a strong conductivity), dipole-dipole interactions, inductive effects, charge-transfer interactions, covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding, and ion-dipole interactions. The steric effect should be included in the above interactions in liquid chromatographic separation. 

Pigment dispersion can be discussed from the fundamental aspects of molecular interactions between water and the pigment (Kobayashi, 1996). 

Drugs are more unstable in solution or liquid dispersion than they are in solid state because the molecular interactions are more plausible in liquid surroundings. 

Box 3.1 Classification of Organic Compounds According to Their Ability to Undergo Particular Molecular Interactions Relative Strengths of Dispersive Energies Between Partitioning Partners A First Glance at Equilibrium Partition Constants Examples of Absorption from the Gas Phase... 

Figure 3.1 Illustration of the various molecular interactions arising from uneven electron distributions (a) dispersive forces, (b) dipole-induced dipole forces, (c) dipole-dipole forces, (d) electron acceptor-electron donor forces.

The set of coefficients (s, p, a, b, constant) obtained from fitting experimental Kjat values for olive oil, as well as for some other organic solvents, are summarized in Table 6.2. These constants clearly quantify the importance of the individual inter-molecular interactions for each solvent. For example, n-hexadecane has nonzero s and p coefficients, representing this solvent s ability to interact via dispersive and polarizability mechanisms. But the a and b coefficients are zero, consistent with our expectation from hexadecane s structure that hydrogen bonding is impossible for this hydrocarbon. At the other extreme in polarity, methanol has nonzero coefficients for all of the terms, demonstrating this solvent s capability to interact via all mechanisms. 

Molecular interactions that lead to attraction include dipole-dipole interactions, dipole-induced dipole interactions, dispersion forces, and hydrogen bonding. 

For simple fluids, also known as Newtonian fluids, it is easy to predict the ease with which they will be poured, pumped, or mixed in either an industrial or end-use situation. This is because the shear viscosity or resistance to flow is a constant at any given temperature and pressure. The fluids that fall into this category are few and far between, because they are of necessity simple in structure. Examples are water, oils, and sugar solutions (e.g., honey unit hi.3), which have no dispersed phases and no molecular interactions. All other fluids are by definition non-Newtonian, so the viscosity is a variable, not a constant. Non-Newtonian fluids are of great interest as they encompass almost all fluids of industrial value. In the food industry, even natural products such as milk or polysaccharide solutions are non-Newtonian. 

Thus, the ion radical salt of BTDM-TTF (ET) with TCNQ has a high conductivity of 1.3 X 102 fl-1cm-1 at room temperature with metallic behavior down to 26 K (Rovira et al. 1994). (The unit of conductance is denoted as H-1, or ohm-1, or even mho, but mostly as S, i.e., siemens 1 S = 1 Ti1). The striking observation was made that the nature and molecular size of donor or acceptor have no substantial effect on the molecular distance within a stack (from 0.32 to 0.35 nm). Meanwhile, increasing the volume of a heteroatom leads to improving intermolecular interactions within given stacks. The enhanced inter-molecular interactions were indeed observed with the substitution of selenium for sulfur. The aforementioned orbital dispersion is more pronounced in the selenium-containing representatives. This arises from the more extensive overlap properties of selenium (Beer et al. 2001). 

---