Kamlet-Taft

Kamlet-Taft Linear Solvation Energy Relationships. Most recent works on LSERs are based on a powerfiil predictive model, known as the Kamlet-Taft model (257), which has provided a framework for numerous studies into specific molecular thermodynamic properties of solvent—solute systems. This model is based on an equation having three conceptually expHcit terms (258). 

A sampling of appHcations of Kamlet-Taft LSERs include the following. (/) The Solvatochromic Parameters for Activity Coefficient Estimation (SPACE) method for infinite dilution activity coefficients where improved predictions over UNIEAC for a database of 1879 critically evaluated experimental data points has been claimed (263). (2) Observation of inverse linear relationship between log 1-octanol—water partition coefficient and Hquid... 

Kamlet-Taft solvent parameters, 2, 123 Kanamycins episulfides... 

This approach to separating the different types of interaetions eontributing to a net solvent effeet has elieited much interest. Tests of the tt, a, and p seales on other solvatochromie or related proeesses have been made, an alternative tt seale based on ehemieally different solvatochromie dyes has been proposed, and the contribution of solvent polarizability to ir has been studied. Opinion is not unanimous, however, that the Kamlet-Taft system eonstitutes the best or ultimate extrathermodynamie approaeh to the study of solvent effeets. There are two objections One of these is to the averaging process by which many model phenomena are eombined to yield a single best-fit value. We eneountered this problem in Section 7.2 when we eonsidered alternative definitions of the Hammett substituent eonstant, and similar eomments apply here Reiehardt has diseussed this in the eontext of the Kamlet-Taft parameters. - The seeond objeetion is to the elaim of generality for the parameters and the eorrelation equation we will return to this eontroversy later. 

The most familiar multivariate LSER is that of the Kamlet—Taft group, whieh in its fully rigged form is now written... 

The 7t scale of solvents (Kamlet-Taft scale) is intended to represent the solute-solvent interactions in the absence of strong forces such as hydrogen-bonding or dipole-dipole interactions. It is based on the n to n absorption of a series of seven solutes (six uitroaromatics, such as 4-uitroanisole, A, A -diethyl-3-nitroaniline, 1-ethyl-4-uitrobeuzeue, etc., aud 4-dimethylamiuobenzophenone) [51-53]. 

H-bonding is an important, but not the sole, interatomic interaction. Thus, total energy is usually calculated as the sum of steric, electrostatic, H-bonding and other components of interatomic interactions. A similar situation holds with QSAR studies of any property (activity) where H-bond parameters are used in combination with other descriptors. For example, five molecular descriptors are applied in the solvation equation of Kamlet-Taft-Abraham excess of molecular refraction (Rj), which models dispersion force interactions arising from the polarizability of n- and n-electrons the solute polarity/polarizability (ir ) due to solute-solvent interactions between bond dipoles and induced dipoles overall or summation H-bond acidity (2a ) overall or summation H-bond basicity (2(3 ) and McGowan volume (VJ [53] ... 

Polymers can be characterized via the Kamlet-Taft approach which describes the ability of a species to act as a hydrogen bond acid (ai), the ability to act as a hydrogen bond base (Pj), the dipolarity/polarizability (7ti ), and the size of a species. These parameters are obtained by dissolving solvatochromic indicator dyes in the respective polymer and by measuring the shift of their absorbance maxima18. 

Table 20. Kamlet-Taft parameters and corresponding ET(30) values.

The properties of organic liquids relevant to their use as solvating agents have also been reviewed [76]. The ability of liquids to solvate a solute species depends mainly on their polarity and polarizability properties, ability to hydrogen bond, and cohesive electron density. These molecular properties are best measured by the Kamlet-Taft solvatochromic parameters, and the square of Hildebrand s solubility parameter. 

From a practical viewpoint, Ej values are quickly and easily obtained, giving a very useful and convenient scale. However, a general polarity scale based on a single probe molecule has its limitations because a single compound cannot experience the diversity of interactions that the whole range of solvents can offer. The Kamlet-Taft parameters a, /3 and n tackle this problem by using a series of seven dyes to produce a scale for specific and nonspecific polarity of liquids [23], Whilst it undoubtedly gives a more detailed description of the solvents properties,... 

Table 1.8 Kamlet-Taft a, fi and tz parameters for selected solvents [1, 2]...

Hydrogen bond donor solvents are simply those containing a hydrogen atom bound to an electronegative atom. These are often referred to as protic solvents, and the class includes water, carboxylic acids, alcohols and amines. For chemical reactions that involve the use of easily hydrolysed or solvolysed compounds, such as AICI3, it is important to avoid protic solvents. Hydrogen bond acceptors are solvents that have a lone pair available for donation, and include acetonitrile, pyridine and acetone. Kamlet-Taft a and ft parameters are solvatochromic measurements of the HBD and HBA properties of solvents, i.e. acidity and basicity, respectively [24], These measurements use the solvatochromic probe molecules V, V-die lliy I -4-n i in tan iline, which acts as a HBA, and 4-nitroaniline, which is a HBA and a HBD (Figure 1.17). 

Table 3.2 Kamlet-Taft parameters for three perfluorinated...

Table 9.1 Ej and Kamlet-Taft 7r polarity parameters for n-hexane and oxidized...

P Kamlet-Taft hydrogen bond acceptor parameter... 

In this respect, the solvatochromic approach developed by Kamlet, Taft and coworkers38 which defines four parameters n. a, ji and <5 (with the addition of others when the need arose), to evaluate the different solvent effects, was highly successful in describing the solvent effects on the rates of reactions, as well as in NMR chemical shifts, IR, UV and fluorescence spectra, sol vent-water partition coefficients etc.38. In addition to the polarity/polarizability of the solvent, measured by the solvatochromic parameter ir, the aptitude to donate a hydrogen atom to form a hydrogen bond, measured by a, or its tendency to provide a pair of electrons to such a bond, /, and the cavity effect (or Hildebrand solubility parameter), S, are integrated in a multi-parametric equation to rationalize the solvent effects. 

The study of solute-solvent and solvent-solvent interactions in mixed solvents has been gaining significance in recent years61-64, because of the increasing application of these solvents. Casassas and collaborators67 have used the Kamlet-Taft multiparametric equation for the correlation of dissociation constants of acids in 1, 4-dioxane-water mixtures. They found that when the main solvent is retained the property does not involve significant changes in the cavity volumes and, in those cases, the pK in binary solvents can be described by equation 8 ... 

The QSAR technique, widely developed by Kamlet, Taft and coworkers38,98 for the prediction of specific solute-solvent interactions, has been used to predict the different solute-solvent contributions to property variations of compounds. The influence of solvent on the relative basicity of dipolar trimethylamines has been recently studied a descriptor was developed to describe a unique solute-solvent interaction involving dipolar amines99. 

Yuan et al. [21] measured the Kamlet-Taft p and n parameters for THF/CO2 mixtures (Figure 9.8). They illustrated that THF/CO2 mixtures had Kamlet-Taft P parameters that were similar to that of THF even when as much as 0.6 mole fraction CO2 is added, and itt of the same mixture decreases to about half the value of that of THF when 0.50 mole fraction CO2 is added to the mixture. 

---