Diffusion fundamental approach

19-K-Ol - Use of H NMR imaging to study the diffusion and co-diffusion of gaseous hydrocarbons in HZSM-5 catalysts 

19-0-02 - Studies of adsorption, diffusion and molecular simulation of cyclic hydrocarbons in MFI zeolites 

University of Cape Town, South Africa warwick chemeng.uct.ac.za 

Deposition of silane on a zeolite s external surface is a well-established method of increasing its shape selective properties by increasing diffusion resistances. In this work, the intracrystalline diffusivities of both parent and silanised ZSM-5 samples are measured by the zero length column technique. It is found that the apparent intracrystalline diffusivity does decrease in the modified samples. This change is either the result of a surface barrier caused by pore mouth narrowing or an increase in intracrystalline tortuosity as a result of pore blockage. It was attempted to clarify the dominant mechanism by considering various mathematical models. 

19-0-04 - Interference microscopy as a tool of choice for investigating the role of crystal morphology in diffusion studies 

---

The mobility ratio equal to the diffusion ratio in this equation would naturally follow from application of the Nemst-Einstein equation, Eq. (88), to transport gels. Since the Nemst-Einstein equation is valid for low-concentration solutes in unbounded solution, one would expect that this equation may hold for dilute gels however, it is necessary to establish the validity of this equation using a more fundamental approach [215,219]. (See a later discussion.) Morris used a linear expression to fit the experimental data for mobility [251]... 

Although more fundamental approaches are used in the science of chemical reaction engineering to account for the diffusion/reaction coupling, we rather propose the explanation restricted to rate laws of first order with respect to hydrogen and based on intuition. 

Such questions are answered empirically all too often. A more fundamental approach is needed. In the area of gas-phase kinetics, the developments in the chemistry of large sets of elementary reactions and diffusion in multi-component mixtures in a combustion context are now finding applications in chemical engineering, as mentioned above. In the area of gas-solid reactions, the information flow will be in the opposite direction. A need exists... 

Besides the simple mathematical approach of combining the rate equation and the diffusion equation, two fundamental approaches exist to derive the reaction-diffusion equation (2.3), namely a phenomenological approach based on the law of conservation and a mesoscopic approach based on a description of the underlying random motion. While it is fairly straightforward to show that the standard reaction-diffusion equation preserves positivity, the problem is much harder, not to say intractable, for other reaction-transport equations. In this context, a mesoscopic approach has definite merit. If that approach is done correctly and accounts for all reaction and transport events that particles can undergo, then by construction the resulting evolution equation preserves positivity and represents a valid reaction-transport equation. For this reason, we prefer equations based on a solid mesoscopic foundation, see Chap. 3. 

Figure 5 illustrates the two fundamental approaches to in-tube SPME (1) active or dynamic, when the analytes are passed through the tube and (2) passive or static, when the analytes are transferred into the sorbent using diffusion. In both of these approaches, the coating may be supported on a fused silica rod, or coated on the inside of a tube or capillary. The theoretical aspects of the extraction processes that use these geometric arrangements will be discussed below. 

With these we enlist the two fundamental approaches to the noncatalytic gas-solid reaction systems The shrinking core model and volume reaction model. In the volnme reaction model, the solid is porous, the fluid easily diffuses in or ont of the solid, such that the reaction can take place homogeneously everywhere in the solid. On the other hand, with the shrinking core model (SCM), also called the sharp interface model (SIM), there is a sharp interface between the unreacted core and reacted shell of the particles. 

Fundamental approach. There is clearly a need for a fundamental equation for under diffusion-controlled conditions... 

Species i is transferred from the mobile liquid phase to an adsorbed state on the particle surface via a number of steps diffusion in the fluid phase around the particle, diffusion across the fluid-particle interfrice, diffusion in liquid in the pores of the particle, adsorption on available sites on the particle pore surface and surface diffusion, if any (see Sections 3.1.3.2.3/4 and 3.4.2.3Z4). A fundamental approach would be to develop a species balance for such a particle phase and couple it with equation (7.1.4) via an additional mass-transfer relation for diffusion in the fluid phase around the particle. Such an approach, with some simplifications by Rosen (1952, 1954), has been illustrated at the very end of this section. 

The design approach is particularly feasible for those reactions in which chemical and pore diffusion rates are most important. For flow related phenomena semi-empirical, dimensionless correlations must be relied on. Therefore in this book scale-up will be used in the more general sense with the airri of using methods that are fundamentally based wherever feasible. 

Hierarchical Structures Huberman and Kerzberg [huber85c] show that 1// noise can result from certain hierarchical structures, the basic idea being that diffusion between different levels of the hierarchy yields a hierarchy of time scales. Since the hierarchical dynamics approach appears to be (on the surface, least) very different from the sandpile CA model, it is an intriguing challenge to see if the two approaches are related on a more fundamental level. 

A number of different approaches have been taken to describing transport in porous media. The objective here is not to review all approaches, but to present a framework for comparison of various approaches in order to highlight those of particular interest for analysis of diffusion and electrophoresis in gels and other nanoporous materials. General reviews on the fundamental aspects of experiments and theory of diffusion in porous media are given... 

Stirred suspensions of droplets have proven to be a popular approach for studying the kinetics of liquid-liquid reactions [54-57]. The basic principle is that one liquid phase takes the form of droplets in the other phase when two immiscible liquids are dispersed. The droplet size can be controlled by changing the agitator speed. For droplets with a diameter < 0.15 cm the inside of the drop is essentially stagnant [54], so that mass transfer to the inside surface of the droplet occurs only by diffusion. In many cases, this technique can lack the necessary control over both the interfacial area and the transport step for determination of fundamental interfacial processes [3], but is still of some value as it reproduces conditions in industrial reactors. 

In the IRT model, reactions of products can be incorporated indirectly and approximately by one of the following procedures (Green et al, 1987) (1) the diffusion approach, (2) the time approach, or (3) the position approach. The diffusion approach is conceptually the simplest. In it, the fundamental entity is the interparticle distance, which evolves by diffusion independently of other such distances along with IRT. Thus, if the interparticle distance was at t = 0, that at time t is simulated as f = r + R3, where R3 is a three-dimensional normally distributed random number of zero mean and variance 2D t. When reaction occurs at t, the product inherits the position of one of the parents taken at random. The procedure is then repeated with new interparticle distances so obtained. 

O Sullivan describes the fundamental theory, mechanistic aspects and practical issues associated with autocatalytic electroless metal deposition processes. Current approaches for gaining fundamental understanding of this complex process are described, along with results for copper, nickel and various alloys. Emphasis is placed on microelectronic applications that include formation of structures that are smaller than the diffusion layer thickness which influences structure formation. 

A more rigorous approach consists of considering that electron hopping between fixed redox sites is fundamentally a percolation problem, each redox center being able to undergo a bounded diffusion motion.16 If these are fast enough, a mean-field behavior is reached in which (4.24) applies replacing d2 by d2 + 3 Ad2, where Adr is the mean displacement of a redox molecule out of its equilibrium position. 

As implied in the previous section, the Russian investigators Zeldovich, Frank-Kamenetskii, and Semenov derived an expression for the laminar flame speed by an important extension of the very simplified Mallard-Le Chatelier approach. Their basic equation included diffusion of species as well as heat. Since their initial insight was that flame propagation was fundamentally a thermal mechanism, they were not concerned with the diffusion of radicals and its effect on the reaction rate. They were concerned with the energy transported by the diffusion of species. 

The variation of efficiencies is due to interaction phenomena caused by the simultaneous diffusional transport of several components. From a fundamental point of view one should therefore take these interaction phenomena explicitly into account in the description of the elementary processes (i.e. mass and heat transfer with chemical reaction). In literature this approach has been used within the non-equilibrium stage model (Sivasubramanian and Boston, 1990). Sawistowski (1983) and Sawistowski and Pilavakis (1979) have developed a model describing reactive distillation in a packed column. Their model incorporates a simple representation of the prevailing mass and heat transfer processes supplemented with a rate equation for chemical reaction, allowing chemical enhancement of mass transfer. They assumed elementary reaction kinetics, equal binary diffusion coefficients and equal molar latent heat of evaporation for each component. 

General discussions of several aspects concerning the treatment of chemical reactions with diffusion are given by Damkohler (D2), Horn and Kiichler (H12), Prager (P7), Schoenemann and Hofmann (SlO), and Trambouze (Til). Corrsin (C21) has discussed the effects of turbulence on chemical reactions from the fundamental point of view of turbulence theory. We will first discuss the application of each type of model to chemical reactors. Then a short comparison will be made between the different approaches. 

---