Diffusion coefficients catalysts

Figure 3 shows calculated catalyst deactivation results caused by a loss of active surface area without a change in the effective diffusion coefficient. Catalyst fouling is proportional to a loss of active surface area if diffusion does not control the reaction rate, so with a high effectiveness factor. On the other hand, a loss of active surface area is compensated to a certain extent in the apparent reaction rate when the effectiveness factor is small, because the effectiveness factor increases with the loss of surface activity. 

When a relatively slow catalytic reaction takes place in a stirred solution, the reactants are suppHed to the catalyst from the immediately neighboring solution so readily that virtually no concentration gradients exist. The intrinsic chemical kinetics determines the rate of the reaction. However, when the intrinsic rate of the reaction is very high and/or the transport of the reactant slow, as in a viscous polymer solution, the concentration gradients become significant, and the transport of reactants to the catalyst cannot keep the catalyst suppHed sufficientiy for the rate of the reaction to be that corresponding to the intrinsic chemical kinetics. Assume that the transport of the reactant in solution is described by Fick s law of diffusion with a diffusion coefficient D, and the intrinsic chemical kinetics is of the foUowing form... 

Figure 10 shows that Tj is a unique function of the Thiele modulus. When the modulus ( ) is small (- SdSl), the effectiveness factor is unity, which means that there is no effect of mass transport on the rate of the catalytic reaction. When ( ) is greater than about 1, the effectiveness factor is less than unity and the reaction rate is influenced by mass transport in the pores. When the modulus is large (- 10), the effectiveness factor is inversely proportional to the modulus, and the reaction rate (eq. 19) is proportional to k ( ), which, from the definition of ( ), implies that the rate and the observed reaction rate constant are proportional to (1 /R)(f9This result shows that both the rate constant, ie, a measure of the intrinsic activity of the catalyst, and the effective diffusion coefficient, ie, a measure of the resistance to transport of the reactant offered by the pore stmcture, influence the rate. It is not appropriate to say that the reaction is diffusion controlled it depends on both the diffusion and the chemical kinetics. In contrast, as shown by equation 3, a reaction in solution can be diffusion controlled, depending on D but not on k. 

The mass transport influence is easy to diagnose experimentally. One measures the rate at various values of the Thiele modulus the modulus is easily changed by variation of R, the particle size. Cmshing and sieving the particles provide catalyst samples for the experiments. If the rate is independent of the particle size, the effectiveness factor is unity for all of them. If the rate is inversely proportional to particle size, the effectiveness factor is less than unity and

experimental points allow triangulation on the curve of Figure 10 and estimation of Tj and ( ). It is also possible to estimate the effective diffusion coefficient and thereby to estimate Tj and ( ) from a single measurement of the rate (48). 

Diffusivity and tortuosity affect resistance to diffusion caused by collision with other molecules (bulk diffusion) or by collision with the walls of the pore (Knudsen diffusion). Actual diffusivity in common porous catalysts is intermediate between the two types. Measurements and correlations of diffusivities of both types are Known. Diffusion is expressed per unit cross section and unit thickness of the pellet. Diffusion rate through the pellet then depends on the porosity d and a tortuosity faclor 1 that accounts for increased resistance of crooked and varied-diameter pores. Effective diffusion coefficient is D ff = Empirical porosities range from 0.3 to 0.7, tortuosities from 2 to 7. In the absence of other information, Satterfield Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice, McGraw-HiU, 1991) recommends taking d = 0.5 and T = 4. In this area, clearly, precision is not a feature. 

Diffusion effects can be expected in reactions that are very rapid. A great deal of effort has been made to shorten the diffusion path, which increases the efficiency of the catalysts. Pellets are made with all the active ingredients concentrated on a thin peripheral shell and monoliths are made with very thin washcoats containing the noble metals. In order to convert 90% of the CO from the inlet stream at a residence time of no more than 0.01 sec, one needs a first-order kinetic rate constant of about 230 sec-1. When the catalytic activity is distributed uniformly through a porous pellet of 0.15 cm radius with a diffusion coefficient of 0.01 cm2/sec, one obtains a Thiele modulus y> = 22.7. This would yield an effectiveness factor of 0.132 for a spherical geometry, and an apparent kinetic rate constant of 30.3 sec-1 (106). 

Temperature gradients within the porous catalyst could not be very large, due to the low concentration of combustibles in the exhaust gas. Assuming a concentration of 5% CO, a diffusion coefficient in the porous structure of 0.01 cms/sec, and a thermal conductivity of 4 X 10-4 caI/sec°C cm, one can calculate a Prater temperature of 1.0°C—the maximum possible temperature gradient in the porous structure (107). The simultaneous heat and mass diffusion is not likely to lead to multiple steady states and instability, since the value of the 0 parameter in the Weisz and Hicks theory would be much less than 0.02 (108). 

Provided that the catalyst is active enough, there will be sufficient conversion of the pollutant gases through the pellet bed and the screen bed. The Sherwood number of CO is almost equal to the Nusselt number, and 2.6% of the inlet CO will not be converted in the monolith. The diffusion coefficient of benzene is somewhat smaller, and 10% of the inlet benzene is not converted in the monolith, no matter how active is the catalyst. This mass transfer limitation can be easily avoided by forcing the streams to change flow direction at the cost of some increased pressure drop. These calculations are comparable with the data in Fig. 22, taken from Carlson 112). 

Here Ceq is the ethylene concentration equilibrium to the concentration in a gaseous phase, Kp the propagation rate constant, N the concentration of the propagation centers on the catalyst surface, Dpe the diffusion coefficient of ethylene through the polymer film, G the yield of polymer weight unit per unit of the catalyst and y0at, ype are the specific gravity of the catalyst and polyethylene. 

Checking the absence of internal mass transfer limitations is a more difficult task. A procedure that can be applied in the case of catalyst electrode films is the measurement of the open circuit potential of the catalyst relative to a reference electrode under fixed gas phase atmosphere (e.g. oxygen in helium) and for different thickness of the catalyst film. Changing of the catalyst potential above a certain thickness of the catalyst film implies the onset of the appearance of internal mass transfer limitations. Such checking procedures applied in previous electrochemical promotion studies allow one to safely assume that porous catalyst films (porosity above 20-30%) with thickness not exceeding 10pm are not expected to exhibit internal mass transfer limitations. The absence of internal mass transfer limitations can also be checked by application of the Weisz-Prater criterion (see, for example ref. 33), provided that one has reliable values for the diffusion coefficient within the catalyst film. 

Fig. 2a-c. Kinetic zone diagram for the catalysis at redox modified electrodes a. The kinetic zones are characterized by capital letters R control by rate of mediation reaction, S control by rate of subtrate diffusion, E control by electron diffusion rate, combinations are mixed and borderline cases b. The kinetic parameters on the axes are given in the form of characteristic currents i, current due to exchange reaction, ig current due to electron diffusion, iji current due to substrate diffusion c. The signpost on the left indicates how a position in the diagram will move on changing experimental parameters c% bulk concentration of substrate c, Cq catalyst concentration in the film Dj, Dg diffusion coefficients of substrate and electrons k, rate constant of exchange reaction k distribution coefficient of substrate between film and solution d> film thickness (from ref. 

GL 21] [no reactor] [P 22] A linear increase in conversion with increasing diffusion coefficient was observed [73], This shows that liquid transport of hydrogen to the catalyst has a dominant role. 

Table 5, Average polymer chain concentration (ape), polymer swellability (S), rotational correlation times of TEMPONE (r) and self-diffusion coefficient of methanol (Zf) in the swollen 2,2% Pd catalysts.

To summarize, there is a sizable and self-consistent body of data indicating that rotational and translational mobility of molecules inside swollen gel-type CFPs are interrelated and controlled mainly by viscosity. Accordingly, T, self-diffusion and diffusion coefficients bear the same information (at least for comparative purposes) concerning diffusion rates within swollen gel phases. However, the measurement of r is by far the most simple (it requires only the collection of a single spectrum). For this reason, only r values have been used so far in the interpretation of diffusion phenomena in swollen heterogeneous metal catalysts supported on CFPs [81,82]. 

Inspection of Fig. 15.3 reveals that while for jo 0.1 nAcm , the effectiveness factor is expected to be close to 1, for a faster reaction with Jo 1 p,A cm , it will drop to about 0.2. This is the case of internal diffusion limitation, well known in heterogeneous catalysis, when the reagent concentration at the outer surface of the catalyst grains is equal to its volume concentration, but drops sharply inside the pores of the catalyst. In this context, it should be pointed out that when the pore size is decreased below about 50 nm, the predominant mechanism of mass transport is Knudsen diffusion [Malek and Coppens, 2003], with the diffusion coefficient being less than the Pick diffusion coefficient and dependent on the porosity and pore stmcture. Moreover, the discrete distribution of the catalytic particles in the CL may also affect the measured current owing to overlap of diffusion zones around closely positioned particles [Antoine et ah, 1998]. 

Fig. 3.3.4 Variation of the tortuosity x inside the catalyst pellets during coking and regeneration, obtained by measuring the self-diffusion coefficient of n-heptane at room temperature.

Ordinary or bulk diffusion is primarily responsible for molecular transport when the mean free path of a molecule is small compared with the diameter of the pore. At 1 atm the mean free path of typical gaseous species is of the order of 10 5 cm or 103 A. In pores larger than 1CT4 cm the mean free path is much smaller than the pore dimension, and collisions with other gas phase molecules will occur much more often than collisions with the pore walls. Under these circumstances the effective diffusivity will be independent of the pore diameter and, within a given catalyst pore, ordinary bulk diffusion coefficients may be used in Fick s first law to evaluate the rate of mass transfer and the concentration profile in the pore. In industrial practice there are three general classes of reaction conditions for which the bulk value of the diffusion coefficient is appropriate. For all catalysts these include liquid phase reactions... 

Barrer (19) has developed another widely used nonsteady-state technique for measuring effective diffusivities in porous catalysts. In this approach, an apparatus configuration similar to the steady-state apparatus is used. One side of the pellet is first evacuated and then the increase in the downstream pressure is recorded as a function of time, the upstream pressure being held constant. The pressure drop across the pellet during the experiment is also held relatively constant. There is a time lag before a steady-state flux develops, and effective diffusion coefficients can be determined from either the transient or steady-state data. For the transient analysis, one must allow for accumulation or depletion of material by adsorption if this occurs. 

The Knudsen diffusion coefficient may be evaluated from equation 12.2.4 if the catalyst property values are used to estimate the average pore radius. From equation C of Illustration 6.2,... 

Consider the spherical catalyst pellet of radius R shown in Figure 12.4. The effective diffusivity approach presumes that diffusion of all types can be represented in terms of Fick s first law and an overall effective diffusion coefficient that can be taken as a constant. That is, the appropriate flux representation is... 

This situation is termed pore-mouth poisoning. As poisoning proceeds the inactive shell thickens and, under extreme conditions, the rate of the catalytic reaction may become limited by the rate of diffusion past the poisoned pore mouths. The apparent activation energy of the reaction under these extreme conditions will be typical of the temperature dependence of diffusion coefficients. If the catalyst and reaction conditions in question are characterized by a low effectiveness factor, one may find that poisoning only a small fraction of the surface gives rise to a disproportionate drop in activity. In a sense one observes a form of selective poisoning. 

An example of the use of PGSE NMR spectroscopy can be found in the studies of Selke et al. [33], who investigated the dependence of enantioselectivity on the distribution of a chiral hydrogenation catalyst between aqueous and micellar phases. When a compound is incorporated into a micelle, its mobility is much lower compared to its mobility in solution. This effect is exactly what is probed with PGSE NMR. The calculated diffusion coefficient is a time-averaged value of the lower diffusion coefficient of the catalyst incorporated into the micelles, and of the diffusion coefficient of the free catalyst. An increased amount of micelle-embedded catalyst was found to lead to an increased enantioselectivity. 

---