Design Styles

Valve Application Technology Functional requirements and the properties of the controlled fluid determine which valve and actuator types are best for a specific apphcation. If demands are modest and no unique valve features are required, the valve-design style selection may be determined solely by cost. If so, general-purpose globe or angle valves provide exceptional value, especially in sizes less than 3-inch NFS and hence are very popular. Beyond type selection, there are many other valve specifications that must be determined properly in order to ultimately yield-improved process control. 

Bau, m. structure constitution construction building make cultivation, -art, /. construction, design, style, -breite, /. over-all breadth. 

Fasson,/. form, shape, design, style, fassonieren, v.t. form, shape, fashion. Fass-pech, n. cooper s pitch pitch in casks. 

For same family design/styles of impellers [29], see Figure 5-12 ... 

MTD (c) = AT = corrected LMTD for specific exchanger design/style... 

Solid board materials may be converted into collapsible or rigid cartons or rigid fiberboard (outers). International codes exist for solid and corrugated fi-berboards in terms of design (style). These cases are specified by style, internal dimensions, board grade, and quality. 

Types that define the behavior expected at the interfaces to classes. Classes implement types. In some design styles, all parameters and variables are declared with types classes are referred to in the code only to instantiate new objects, and even that is encapsulated within factory objects. 

For an inheritance-based design, the template method (see Section 11.3.1.2, Framework-Style Reuse and the Template Method) forms the basis of plug-ins. This design style, common initially, has now fallen somewhat out of favor. 

Choose the container to suit the site or design style you have in mind. A Versailles box or "aged" stone urn will give a very different feel from florists buckets or a brightly painted wooden box. You don t have to spend a lot to look sharp. Even the simplest containers can be used to formal effect if several are planted similarly and arranged in a neat row. 

Valve Types Types of valves are categorized according to their design style. These styles can be grouped into type of stem motion— linear or rotary. The valve stem is the rod, shaft, or spindle that connects the actuator with the closure member (i.e., a movable part of the valve that is positioned in the flow path to modify the rate of flow). Movement of either type of stem is known as travel. The major categories are described briefly below. 

Functional requirements and the properties of the controlled fluid determine which valve and actuator types are best for a specific application. If demands are modest and no unique valve features are required, the valve design style selection may be determined solely by... 

Journalists covering subsequent battles between political foes have deliberately used politicians dachas as backdrops for their news reports. Not only do dachas make good visuals, but journalists and political activists have reframed discussions of architectural styles and locations into commentaries on politicians presumed sympathies and agendas (Pankin 2005a, 2005b). As news accounts hinted, whether politicians chose classical or modern design styles seemed to be a good indication of their political inclinations. 

The 2.5-D layout design framework developed in this work is illustrated in Fig. 4.1. We apply different design flows for two major ASIC design styles, hierarchical and flattened styles. 

In a flattened design style, layout designers directly cany out the 2.5-D placement and routing tasks on a flatten netlist consisting of both standard cells and macros. Such a flow could usually accomplish superior solution quality, but at the cost of a longer turnaround time because of the inability to implement different blocks in parallel. 

In this chapter, we proposed a complete layout design framework for the 2.5-D integration scheme. This framework consists of layout synthesis tools developed to fit the requirements of different design styles at major VLSI physical design stages. 

The objective of the 2.5-D placement problem is to map a cell netlist (pure standard cell or mixed macro/standard cell) to unique positions in a layered space as illustrated in Fig. 6.1. The inter-chip contacts are assumed to be placed on top of the chip with no need to consume substrate area. We need to differentiate two scenarios hierarchical and flattened design styles. In a hierarchical design set up, after the floorplanning step, cells in a block need to be placed. As mentioned in the last chapter, a random-logic based block could be split into two chips. The 2.5-D placement problem is to assign the cells within such a block to unique positions on two chips. On the other hand, in a flattened design style, the 2.5-D placement problem is to place both standard cell macros onto stacked chips. 

In the following sections of this chapter, we studied the 2.5-D placement problem under the above mentioned three formulations pure standard cell designs with inter-chip contacts consuming substrate area, pure standard cell designs with inter-chip contacts on top of die surface, and mixed standard cell and macro designs corresponding to a flattened design style. 

In this section, we consider the second scenario of 2.5-D placement, where a hierarchical design style is applied and the inter-chip contacts can be placed above the top-level metal layer. 

In the first chapter, we briefly reviewed the potential techniques to solve the testing problem for 2.5-D integrated systems. Based on various isolation and selftesting methodologies, these testing solutions could well handle the block-based design style in which every functional block is located within a specific chip and the inter-chip interconnections are only assigned to inter-block wires. 

---