Describing electrons in multi-electron systems

In crystal field theory, we consider repulsions between (/-electrons and ligand electrons, but ignore interactions between (/-electrons on the metal centre. This is actually an aspect of a more general question about how we describe the interactions between electrons in multi-electron systems. We will now show why simple electron configurations such as Is p or As d do not uniquely define the arrangement of the electrons. This leads us to an introduction of term 

In the answer to worked example 1.7, we ignored a complication. In assigning quantum numbers to the four 2p electrons, how do we indicate whether the last electron is in an orbital with mi = +1, 0 or —1 This, and related questions, can be answered only by considering the interaction of electrons, primarily by means of the coupling of magnetic fields generated by their spin or orbital motion hence the importance of spin and orbital angular momentum (see SectiOTi 1.6). 

For any system containing more than one electron, the energy of an electron with principal quantum number n depends on the value of /, and this also determines the orbital angular momentum which is given by eq. 20.8 (see Box 1.4). 

As a means of cross-checking, it is useful to know what values of L are possible. The allowed values of L can be determined from / for the individual electrons in the multi-electron system. For two electrons with values of /] and I2.  

The modulus sign around the last term indicates that /i - /2I may only be zero or a positive value. As an example, consider a configuration. Each electron has /=1, and so the allowed values of L are 2, 1 or 0. Similarly, for a fiP configuration, each electron has 1=2, and so the allowed values of L are 4, 3, 2, 1 or 0. For systems with three or more electrons, the electron-electron coupling must be considered in sequential steps couple and I2 as above to give a resultant L, and then couple L with /a, and so on. 

---

Chapter 21 Describing electrons in multi-electron systems 655... 

As mentioned in Chapter 5, one can think of the expansion of an unknown MO in terms of basis functions as describing the MO function in the coordinate system of the basis functions. The multi-determinant wave function (4.1) can similarly be considered as describing the total wave function in a coordinate system of Slater determinants. The basis set determines the size of the one-electron basis (and thus limits the description of the one-electron functions, the MOs), while the number of determinants included determines the size of the many-electron basis (and thus limits the description of electron correlation). 

If a molecule with no-bond homoaromaticity is investigated, the system in question possesses a non-classical structure with an interaction distance typical of a transition state rather than a closed-shell equilibrium structure. One can consider no-bond homoconjugative interactions as a result of extreme bond stretching and the formation of a singlet biradical, i.e. a low-spin open-shell system. Normally such a situation can only be handled by a multi-determinant description, but in the case of a homoaromatic compound the two single electrons interact with adjacent rc-electrons and form together a delocalized electron system, which can be described by a single determinant ab initio method provided sufficient dynamic electron correlation is covered by the method. 

Chapter 3 describes radiationless transitions in the tunneling electron transfers in multi-electron systems. The following are examined within the framework of electron Green s function approach the dependence on distance, the influence of crystalline media, and the effect of intermediate particles on the tunneling transfer. It is demonstrated that the Born-Oppenheimer approximation for the wave function is invalid for longdistance tunneling. 

When desorption takes place from a metal surface, many hot charge carriers are generated in the substrate by laser irradiation and are extended over the substrate. Then, the desorption occurs through substrate-mediated excitation. In the case of semiconductor surfaces, the excitation occurs in the substrate because of the narrow band gap. However, the desorption is caused by a local excitation, since the chemisorption bond is made of a localized electron of a substrate surface atom. When the substrate is an oxide, on the other hand, little or no substrate electronic-excitation occurs due to the wide band gap and the excitation relevant to the desorption is local. Thus, the desorption mechanism for adsorbed molecules is quite different at metal and oxide surfaces. Furthermore, the multi-dimensional potential energy surface (PES) of the electronic excited state in the adsorbed system has been obtained theoretically on oxide surfaces [19, 20] due to a localized system, but has scarcely been calculated on metal surfaces [21, 22] because of the delocalized and extended nature of the system. We describe desorption processes undergoing a single excitation for NO and CO desorption from both metal and oxide surfaces. 

Based on an extension [35] of the Runge-Gross theorems descried in Sect. 2 to arbitrary multi-component systems one can develop [36] a TDDFT for the coupled system of electrons and nuclei described above. In analogy to Sects. 2.1-2.3, one can establish three basic statements First of all, there exists a rigorous 1-1 mapping between the vector of external potentials and the vector of electronic and nuclear densities,... 

The specific structure of the states for Hp was described in detail in [79], where it is mentioned as a well-known physical effect. For example, it was noted in the theory of disordered semiconductors that a similar "ladder" structure of states is realized for the system where the Coulomb potential is modified within a sphere as a constant potential (see [86,87] for a qualitative discussion and analytical solution of the problem). For quantum chemistry, the situation is interesting, as was shown in a series of publications of Connerade, Dolmatov and others (see e.g. [19,88-91] note that the series of publications on confined many-electron systems by these authors is much wider). The picture described is realized to some extent for the effective potential of inner electrons in multi-electron atoms, as it is defined by orbital densities with a number of maximal points. The existence of a number of extrema generates a system of the type described above [89]. This situation was modeled and described for the one-electron atom in [88] it is similar to that one described in Sections 5.2 and 5.3. 

Thus, the method described above allows us to obtain a number of new physical results partially presented in this communication. These calculations are carried out in the Hartree-Fock approximation for multi-electron systems and are exact solutions of the Schrodinger equation for the single-electron case. As the following development of the method we plan to implement the configuration interaction approach in order to study correlation effects in multi-electron systems both in electric and magnetic fields. 

After the development of the Dirac equation one might have guessed that, within a framework in which the state of a many-electron system is described by a multi-Dirac spinor, the velocity factors Vj in (1.2) should simply be replaced by their formal counterparts in Dirac theory, viz, coj. This yields the operator... 

Resonant multi-photon ionization (REMPI). This is a variant of MPI described above, in which one or more photons promote a molecule to an electronically excited state and then additional photons generate ions from the excited state. The power of this method in the study of chemical reactions is its selectivity. In a chemically reacting system, individual reactants and products can be chosen by tuning the frequency of the laser generating the radiation to the electronic absorption band of specific molecules. 

Slater determinants) in terms of these one-electron functions. We then consider the Hartree-Fock approximation in which the exact wave function of the system is approximated by a single Slater determinant and describe its qualitative features. At this point, we introduce a simple system, the minimal basis (Is orbital on each atom) ab initio model of the hydrogen molecule. We shall use this model throughout the book as a pedagogical tool to illustrate and illuminate the essential features of a variety of formalisms that at first glance appear to be rather formidable. Finally, we discuss the multi-determinantal expansion of the exact wave function of an N-electron system. 

---