Cyclopropanes formation from carbenes

By analogy with cyclopropane formation from carbenes and C=C bonds, azo compounds might be expected to give diaziridines in their reaction with carbenes. Although acyclic ADC compounds react readily with diazoalkanes... 

Two resonance-contributing structures (3a and 3b), in the formalism of ylide structures, can be used to describe metal carbene intermediates. The highly electrophilic character of those derived from Cu and Rh catalysts suggests that the contribution from the metal-stabilized carbocation 3b is important in the overall evaluation of the reactivities and selectivities of these metal carbene intermediates. Emphasis on the metal carbene structure 3a has led to the subsequently discounted proposal that cyclopropane formation from reactions with alkenes occurs through the intervention of a metallocyclobutane intermediate [18]. The metal-stabilized carbocation structure 3b is consistent with the cyclopropanation mechanism in which LnM dissociates from the carbene as bond-formation occurs between the carbene and the reacting alkene (Eq. 5.4) [7,15]. 

This topological rule readily explained the reaction product 211 (>90% stereoselectivity) of open-chain nitroolefins 209 with open-chain enamines 210. Seebach and Golinski have further pointed out that several condensation reactions can also be rationalized by using this approach (a) cyclopropane formation from olefin and carbene, (b) Wittig reaction with aldehydes yielding cis olefins, (c) trans-dialkyl oxirane from alkylidene triphenylarsane and aldehydes, (d) ketenes and cyclopentadiene 2+2-addition, le) (E)-silyl-nitronate and aldehydes, (f) syn and anti-Li and B-enolates of ketones, esters, amides and aldehydes, (g) Z-allylboranes and aldehydes, (h) E-alkyl-borane or E-allylchromium derivatives and aldehydes, (i) enamine from cyclohexanone and cinnamic aldehyde, (j) E-enamines and E-nitroolefins and finally, (k) enamines from cycloalkanones and styryl sulfone. 

The reaction system (6-37) includes the thermal azo-extrusion of a cyclic azo compound to a cyclopropane derivative and the direct formation of cyclopropanes, catalyzed by metal complexes. Synthetic routes to cyclopropane derivatives became an important subject in the last two decades, and one frequently used method is the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of a diazoalkane to an alkene followed by thermal or photolytic azo-extrusion of the 4,5-dihydro-3//-pyrazole formed to the cyclopropane derivative (6-37 A). This route can be followed in many cases without isolation, or even without direct observation, of the 4,5-dihydro-3//-pyrazole. Therefore, it is formally very similar to cyclopropane formation from alkenes with diazoalkanes, in which a carbene is first formed by azo-extrusion of the diazoalkane (see Sect. 8.3). As shown in pathway (6-37 B), this step can be catalyzed by copper, palladium, or rhodium complexes (see Sects. 8.2, 8.7, and 8.8). There are cases where it is not clearly known whether route A or B is followed. Scheme 6-37 also includes... 

Although no cyclopropane formation was observed in the reactions of heteroatom-stabilized carbene complexes with simple alkenes such as cyclohexene or tetramethylethylene, cyclopropane formation has been observed both with electron-deficient a,) -unsaturated esters and with electron-rich vinyl ethers. The mechanisms involved in cyclopropane formation from these very different classes of alkenes may be substantially different. 

Diazomethane is also decomposed by N O)40 -43 and Pd(0) complexes43 . Electron-poor alkenes such as methyl acrylate are cyclopropanated efficiently with Ni(0) catalysts, whereas with Pd(0) yields were much lower (Scheme 1)43). Cyclopropanes derived from styrene, cyclohexene or 1-hexene were formed only in trace yields. In the uncatalyzed reaction between diazomethane and methyl acrylate, methyl 2-pyrazoline-3-carboxylate and methyl crotonate are formed competitively, but the yield of the latter can be largely reduced by adding an appropriate amount of catalyst. It has been verified that cyclopropane formation does not result from metal-catalyzed ring contraction of the 2-pyrazoline, Instead, a nickel(0)-carbene complex is assumed to be involved in the direct cyclopropanation of the olefin. The preference of such an intermediate for an electron-poor alkene is in agreement with the view that nickel carbenoids are nucleophilic 44). 

The Lewis acid-Lewis base interaction outlined in Scheme 43 also explains the formation of alkylrhodium complexes 414 from iodorhodium(III) meso-tetraphenyl-porphyrin 409 and various diazo compounds (Scheme 42)398), It seems reasonable to assume that intermediates 418 or 419 (corresponding to 415 and 417 in Scheme 43) are trapped by an added nucleophile in the reaction with ethyl diazoacetate, and that similar intermediates, by proton loss, give rise to vinylrhodium complexes from ethyl 2-diazopropionate or dimethyl diazosuccinate. As the rhodium porphyrin 409 is also an efficient catalyst for cyclopropanation of olefins with ethyl diazoacetate 87,1°°), stj bene formation from aryl diazomethanes 358 and carbene insertion into aliphatic C—H bonds 287, intermediates 418 or 419 are likely to be part of the mechanistic scheme of these reactions, too. 

In order to rationalize the catalyst-dependent selectivity of cyclopropanation reaction with respect to the alkene, the ability of a transition metal for olefin coordination has been considered to be a key factor (see Sect. 2.2.1 and 2.2.2). It was proposed that palladium and certain copper catalysts promote cyclopropanation through intramolecular carbene transfer from a metal carbene to an alkene molecule coordinated to the same metal atom25,64. The preferential cyclopropanation of terminal olefins and the less hindered double bond in dienes spoke in favor of metal-olefin coordination. Furthermore, stable and metastable metal-carbene-olefin complexes are known, some of which undergo intramolecular cyclopropane formation, e.g. 426 - 427 415). 

In a significant series of reports describing the formation of metathesislike products from cyclopropanes via a carbene retroaddition reaction, Gassman (68) also presented results that were interpreted to mean that carbenes which normally participate in conventional metatheses are negatively polarized (nucleophilic). 

If Scheme 2 accurately represented the PhCH2CCl chemistry, curvature in the addn/rearr vs. [alkene] correlation would persist when the carbene was generated from 37. The absence of curvature in this case counts against Scheme 2 (and the CAC mechanism), but accords with the RIES mechanism, Scheme 3. Elimination of the diazirine precursor eliminates the diazirine excited state. From 37, both cyclopropane formation and 1,2-H rearrangement proceed from a single (carbene) intermediate, and addn/rearr vs. [alkene] is linear.25... 

A complicating factor associated with experimental application of the Skell Hypothesis is that triplet carbenes abstract hydrogen atoms from many olefins more rapidly than they add to them. Also, in general, the two cyclopropanes that can be formed are diastereomers, and thus there is no reason to expect that they will be formed from an intermediate with equal efficiency. To allay these problems, stereospecifically deuteriated a-methyl-styrene has been employed as a probe for the multiplicity of the reacting carbene. In this case, one bond formation from the triplet carbene is expected to be rapid since it generates a particularly well-stabilized 1,3-biradical. Also, the two cyclopropane isomers differ only in isotopic substitution and this is anticipated to have only a small effect on the efficiencies of their formation. The expected non-stereospecific reaction of the triplet carbene is shown in (15) and its stereospecific counterpart in (16). 

The generation of the dichloromethane under phase-transfer conditions may be facilitated by the addition of a trace of ethanol. Alkoxide anions, generated under the basic conditions, are more readily transferred across the two-phase interface than are hydroxide ions (see Chapter 1). Although this process may result in the increased solvolysis of the chloroform, it also produces a higher concentration of the carbene in the organic phase and thereby increases the rate of formation of the cyclopropane derivatives from reactive alkenes. 

Cyclopropane formation occurs from reactions between diazo compounds and alkenes, catalyzed by a wide variety of transition-metal compounds [7-9], that involve the addition of a carbene entity to a C-C double bond. This transformation is stereospecific and generally occurs with electron-rich alkenes, including substituted olefins, dienes, and vinyl ethers, but not a,(J-unsaturated carbonyl compounds or nitriles [23,24], Relative reactivities portray a highly electrophilic intermediate and an early transition state for cyclopropanation reactions [15,25], accounting in part for the relative difficulty in controlling selectivity. For intermolecular reactions, the formation of geometrical isomers, regioisomers from reactions with dienes, and enantiomers must all be taken into account. 

The four-coordinate sqnare planar iron(n) porphyrins discussed above are not only of great valne in heme protein model chemistry, but also in chemical applications, since they undergo a wealth of ligand addition reactions. For example it has been shown that TPPFe complexes are active catalysts for important carbon transfer reactions in organic chemistry and are found to catalyze the stereoselective cyclopropanation of aUcenes, olefin formation from diazoalkanes, and the efficient and selective olefination of aldehydes and other carbonyl compounds. The active species in these carbon transfer reactions are presumably iron porphyrin carbene complexes. " It was also found that ferrous hemin anchored to Ti02 thin films reduce organic halides, which can pose serious health problems and are of considerable environmental concern because of their prevalence in groundwater. ... 

As already mentioned for rhodium carbene complexes, proof of the existence of electrophilic metal carbenoids relies on indirect evidence, and insight into the nature of intermediates is obtained mostly through reactivity-selectivity relationships and/or comparison with stable Fischer-type metal carbene complexes. A particularly puzzling point is the relevance of metallacyclobutanes as intermediates in cyclopropane formation. The subject is still a matter of debate in the literature. Even if some metallacyclobutanes have been shown to yield cyclopropanes by reductive elimination [15], the intermediacy of metallacyclobutanes in carbene transfer reactions is in most cases borne out neither by direct observation nor by clear-cut mechanistic studies and such a reaction pathway is probably not a general one. Formation of a metallacyclobu-tane requires coordination both of the olefin and of the carbene to the metal center. In many cases, all available evidence points to direct reaction of the metal carbenes with alkenes without prior olefin coordination. Further, it has been proposed that, at least in the context of rhodium carbenoid insertions into C-H bonds, partial release of free carbenes from metal carbene complexes occurs [16]. Of course this does not exclude the possibility that metallacyclobutanes play a pivotal role in some catalyst systems, especially in copper-and palladium-catalyzed reactions. 

Although arylcarbenes have been generated from aryl-substituted tetrazoles, the necessary reaction conditions (flash-vacuum pyrolysis) are such that cyclopropane formation does not occur. When the corresponding anion is used as the precursor, however, carbene generation and cyclopropane formation can be achieved under mild conditions. Thus, irradiation of tetra-butylammonium 5-phenyltetrazolide dissolved in a hydrocarbon containing 2-methylbut-2-ene yielded, conceivably via phenyldiazomethane, a mixture of cis- and fra 5-2,2,3-trimethyl-l-phenylcyclopropane in a 0.8 1.0 ratio. 

A ruthenium carbene complex in the presence of a chiral ligand is capable of catalyzing the formation of optically active cyclopropane derivatives from alkenes and diazo compounds in high enantiomeric excess [177]. A mixture of [RuCl2(/ -cymene)] in the presence of pybox-(5,5)-/ catalyzes the asymmetric cyclopropanation of styrene (eq (48)). The key intermediate is proposed to be a dichloro(pybox)ruthenium carbene complex. 

Formation of the fused cyclopropane 96 from 95 by carbene cycloaddition, and subsequent TFA-mediated ring expansion provided access to the 1-benzoxepines 97 in low to moderate... 

---