Cyclohexanol ionization

Although kinetic evidence for prior equilibrium inclusion was not obtained, competitive inhibition by cyclohexanol and apparent substrate specificity once again provide strong support for this mechanism. Since the rate of the catalytic reaction is strictly proportional to the concentration of the ionized hydroxamate function (kinetic and spectrophotometric p/Cas are identical within experimental error and are equal to 8.5), the reaction probably proceeds by a nucleophilic mechanism to produce an acyl intermediate. Although acyl derivatives of N-alkylhydroxamic acids are exceptionally labile in aqueous solution, deacylation is nevertheless the ratedetermining step of the overall hydrolysis (Gruhn and Bender, 1969). 

The theoretical treatment of the hydrophobic effect is limited to pure aqueous systems. To describe chromatographic separations in RPC Horvath and Melander developed the solvophobic theory [47]. In this theory, no special assumptions are made about the properties of solute and solvent, and besides hydrophobic interaction electrostatic and other specific interactions are included. The theory has been valuable to describe the retention of nonpolar [48], polar [49], and ionizable [50] solutes in RPC. The modulation of selectivity via secondary equilibria (variation of pH, ion pair formation [51]) can also be described. On the other hand, it is not a problem to find examples of dispersive interactions in literature, e.g., separation of carotinoids with a long chain (C30) RP gives a higher selectivity compared to standard RP C18 cyclohexanols are preferentially retarded on cyclohexyl-bonded phases compared to phases with linear-bonded alkyl groups. 

The reaction mixture (2 g) was esterified at reflux with methanol (15 cm ) in the presence of 2 drops of concentrated H2SO4 to obtain the diacids in the diesters form. The products were analysed using a Hewlett Packard gas chromatograph equipped with a Carbowax 52 CB polar capillary column and a flame ionization detector assembled with a Shimadzu programmed and computerized Chromatopac CR6A. The reaction products consisted of adipic, glutaric, succinic and 6-hydroxycaproic acids, cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol and butyrolactone. 

Kinetic investigations revealed that the antibody first catalyzes the ionization of the arenesulfonate 62 to generate the first carbocation, this process has an ER of 3.2°ol0 and a K =320 pM. The resulting cation can then either cyclize to decalins 58,59,60 in a concerted process (as via the transition structure 63) or in a stepwise fashion. The formation of significant amounts of cyclohexanols... 

Photoionization of the hydrocarbon followed by dissociative electron attachment (Reaction 1) should be considered since the ionization potential of a molecule is less in the liquid phase than it is in the gas phase. For hydrocarbons the ionization potential is 1 to 1.5 e.v. less in the liquid phase (24). The photon energy at 1470 A. is about 1.4 e.v. below the gas-phase ionization potentials of cyclohexane and 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (14). Some ionization may therefore occur, but the efficiency of this process is expected to be low. Photoionization is eliminated as a source of N2 for the following reasons. (1) If photoionization occurred and the electron reacted with nitrous oxide, then O" would be formed. It has been shown in the radiolysis of cyclohexane-nitrous oxide solutions that subsequent reactions of O result in the formation of cyclohexene and dicyclohexyl (I, 16, 17) and very little cyclohexanol (16, Table III). In the photolysis nitrous oxide reduces the yield of cyclohexene and does not affect the yield of dicyclohexyl. This indicates that O is not formed in the photolysis, and consequently N2 does not result from electron capture. (2) A further argument against photoionization is that cyclohexane and 2,2,4-trimethylpentane have comparable gas-phase ionization potentials but exhibit quite different behavior with respect to N2 formation. 

Another way of explaining this difference in acidity is to say that the activation energy (the energy differential between the reactants and the transition state of the reaction) for phenol s ionization is less than that of cyclohexanol s loss of a proton. NaOH is a base that will receive a proton from phenol but not from the weaker acid cyclohexanol. Experimentally, this means that the phenoxide salt will be in the aqueous layer of an ethereal-aqueous mixture and will easily be removed. Subsequent protonation will yield phenol. 

This reaction is exemplified in Figure 6.5, which is the spectrum of 1-hexanol (MW = 102 u). This alcohol fails to yield the M+ ion but exhibits the loss of H2O to produce an ion at m/z 84. The water loss is, however, nonspecific and occurs via a six-membered ring (other rings are also possible). For example, the loss of water from cyclohexanol occurs via 1,2-, 1,3-, and 1,4-processes. Another example of nonspecific water loss is from tetralol. The loss of HCl from alkyl chlorides also requires H-transfer to the ionized Cl atom ... 

---