Critical micelle concentrations, determination

Gao, Z., Wasylishen, R.E., and Kwak, J.C.T., An NMR paramagnetic relaxation method to determine distribution coefficients of solubilization in micellar systems, J. Phys. Chem., 93, 2190, 1989. Treiner, C., The partitioning of neutral solutes between micelles and water as deduced from critical micelle concentration determinations, in Solubilization in Surfactant Aggregates, Christian, S.D. and Scamehorn, J.R, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995, chap. 12. 

Table 1 Critical micelle concentrations determined by surface tension measurements...

Light Scattering Critical Micelle Concentration Determination... 

Ananthapadmanabhan, K.P. et al. (1985) Fluorescence probes far critical micelle concentration determination. Langmuir, 1,352-355. 

V. Critical Micelle Concentration Determinations and Micellization of Monomeric Phospholipids by Detergents... 

Dominguez, A. Fernandez, A. Gonzalez, N. et al. Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Some Surfactants by Three Techniques, /. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 1227-1231. 

Critical Micelle Concentration. The rate at which the properties of surfactant solutions vary with concentration changes at the concentration where micelle formation starts. Surface and interfacial tension, equivalent conductance (50), dye solubilization (51), iodine solubilization (52), and refractive index (53) are properties commonly used as the basis for methods of CMC determination. 

One of the most important characteristics of the emulsifier is its CMC, which is defined as the critical concentration value below which no micelle formation occurs. The critical micelle concentration of an emulsifier is determined by the structure and the number of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups included in the emulsifier molecule. The hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) number is a good criterion for the selection of proper emulsifier. The HLB scale was developed by W. C. Griffin [46,47]. Based on his approach, the HLB number of an emulsifier can be calculated by dividing... 

Table 17 shows the CMCs of sodium alcohol propoxysulfates at 20°C determined from surface tension measurements by the maximum bubble pressure [127] and Table 18 shows the critical micelle concentrations of sodium pro-poxylated octylphenol and propoxylated nonylphenol sulfates. Surface tension... 

Recently, the newly developed time-resolved quasielastic laser scattering (QELS) has been applied to follow the changes in the surface tension of the nonpolarized water nitrobenzene interface upon the injection of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [34] and sodium dodecyl sulfate [35] around or beyond their critical micelle concentrations. As a matter of fact, the method is based on the determination of the frequency of the thermally excited capillary waves at liquid-liquid interfaces. Since the capillary wave frequency is a function of the surface tension, and the change in the surface tension reflects the ion surface concentration, the QELS method allows us to observe the dynamic changes of the ITIES, such as the formation of monolayers of various surfactants [34]. 

It was mentioned previously that the narrow range of concentrations in which sudden changes are produced in the physicochemical properties in solutions of surfactants is known as critical micelle concentration. To determine the value of this parameter the change in one of these properties can be used so normally electrical conductivity, surface tension, or refraction index can be measured. Numerous cmc values have been published, most of them for surfactants that contain hydrocarbon chains of between 10 and 16 carbon atoms [1, 3, 7], The value of the cmc depends on several factors such as the length of the surfactant chain, the presence of electrolytes, temperature, and pressure [7, 14], Some of these values of cmc are shown in Table 2. 

The critical concentration at which the first micelle forms is called the critical micelle concentration, or CMC. As the concentration of block copolymer chains increases in the solution, more micelles are formed while the concentration of nonassociated chains, called unimers, remains constant and is equal to the value of the CMC. This ideal situation corresponds to a system at thermodynamic equilibrium. However, experimental investigations on the CMC have revealed that its value depends on the method used for its determination. Therefore, it seems more reasonable to define phenomenologically the CMC as the concentration at which a sufficient number of micelles is formed to be detected by a given method [16]. In practical terms, the CMC is often determined from plots of the surface tension as a function of the logarithm of the concentration. The CMC is then defined as the concentration at which the surface tension stops decreasing and reaches a plateau value. 

In the process of realizing product quality factors by changing product formulation, the relevant performance indices have to be determined. The determination process in turn requires experience and technical expertise. For detergent products the performance indices need to be considered include (1) optimum hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, HLB0p (2) critical micelle concentration, CMC (3) soil solubilization capacity, S (4) Krafft point,... 

Determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of Butyric Acid by refractometry ... 

To understand micelle formation quantitatively, critical micelle concentrations (cmc) have to be determined for a large number of surf actants ( 5 ). When the cmc values of the surfactants with the same hydrophilic group (a homologous series) are examined, a nearly 3-fold decrease in cmc is observed for nonlonlc and zwitterionlc surfactants (1,2) upon the addition of a methylene group into the hydrocarbon chain, whereas, a 2-fold or only 1.8-fold reduction in cmc can be observed for univalent (1,2) and blvalent( ) ionic surfactants,respectively. 

It turned out that for all the polymeric amphiphiles of the (EO) -(PO)m-(EO) type there was an increase in enantioselectivity compared with the reaction without amphiphile. Moreover, the ratio of the length of the (PO) block compared with the (EO) block seemed to determine enantioselectivity and activity and not the cmc (critical micelle concentration). A (PO) block length of 56 units works best with different length of the (EO)n block in this type of hydrogenation [30]. for the work-up of the experiments, G. Oehme et al. used the extraction method, but initial experiments failed and the catalyst could not be recycled that way. To solve this problem the authors applied a membrane reactor in combination with the amphiphile (EO)37-(PO)5g-(EO)37 (Tab. 6.1, entry 9) [31]. By doing so, the poly-mer/Rh-catalyst was retained and could be reused several times without loss of activity and enantioselectivity by more than 99%. 

Several ISEs have been proposed for the determination of ionized surfactants the membrane contains a surfactant ion and a suitable ion-exchanger ion [18,31, 36, 55-57,95,131, 160,178,225]. They are mostly used forstudy of critical micelle concentrations and of other aggregations in solutions of surfactant salts. 

Partition coefficients of surfactants have been reported to remain constant below the critical micelle concentration (CMC), and to increase with concentration above the CMC (2,9,10). The effect of surfactant concentration in the aqueous phase (C ) on K was investigated with Makon 14 (14 mol% ethylene oxide, NPEj ), the results are given in Fig. 2. These data indicate a CMC of about O.lg/1, or 12 piM, in close agreement with the value obtained by surface tension measurements (our data and ref. 22). In subsequent determinations of Kp, C was just below the CMC to minimize the effects of micellization (15,23). 

In this experiment the degree of ionization of CTAB micelles is determined by measuring the change in slope of solution electrical conductivity (k) versus total concentration (C) as the solution goes through the critical micelle concentration (cmc). That this information is suffi-... 

The critical micelle concentrations (cmc) of the mixed surfactant systems were determined by measuring the surface tension as a function of total surfactant concentration on a du Noiiy ring balance at 25°C. 

Test Methods. Surface tension (y) measurements were taken by Wil-helmy method (25+0.1°C). Critical micelle concentrations (cmc) were obtained from Y logC curves. Contact angle. Type GI, Japan. Wetting test. Canvas disk method, CIS,HG-2-380-66. Foam test, Ross-Miles lather method. Emulslbillty was determined by mixing 20 ml of 2.5%... 

Let us recall the micellar aqueous system, as this procedure is actually the basic one. The chemistry is based on fatty acids, that build micelles in higher pH ranges and vesicles at pH c. 8.0-8.5 (Hargreaves and Deamer, 1978a). The interest in fatty acids lies also in the fact that they are considered possible candidates for the first prebiotic membranes, as will be seen later on. The experimental apparatus is particularly simple, also a reminder of a possible prebiotic situation the water-insoluble ethyl caprylate is overlaid on an aqueous alkaline solution, so that at the macroscopic interphase there is an hydrolysis reaction that produces caprylate ions. The reaction is very slow, as shown in Figure 7.15, but eventually the critical micelle concentration (cmc) is reached in solution, and thus the first caprylate micelles are formed. Aqueous micelles can actually be seen as lipophylic spherical surfaces, to which the lipophylic ethyl caprylate (EC) avidly binds. The efficient molecular dispersion of EC on the micellar surface speeds up its hydrolysis, (a kind of physical micellar catalysis) and caprylate ions are rapidly formed. This results in the formation of more micelles. However, more micelles determine more binding of the water-insoluble EC, with the formation of more and more micelles a typical autocatalytic behavior. The increase in micelle population was directly monitored by fluorescence quenching techniques, as already used in the case of the... 

To enhance the shelf life of finished paper product, the step 1 product was applied below its critical micelle concentration (CMC). Materials additized above the CMC formed insoluble gels when aged for 8 days at 73°C. The CMC ranges was determined using glyoxalated poly(vinylamide-co-diallyldimethyl-ammonium chloride) containing 90 wt% vinylamide and are provided in Table 1. 

Critical micelle concentration in aqueous solutions was determined by fluorescence using pyrene as a probe. The driving force for micelle formation is the strong hydro-phobic interactions between [(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] block. It was previously determined by this group that terpolymers with longer PHB blocks have much lower critical micelle concentrations because of PHB block aggregation in aqueous solution. Testing results are provided in Table 2. 

TABLE 2. Critical Micelle Concentration of Polyjethylene oxide-/>-[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrateJ diol-ft-ethylene oxide Determined at 23°C in Aqueous Solution... 

Determination of the Critical Micelle Concentration of Cationic Surfactants 226... 

---