Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Criterion kinetic models

The positive values obtained in practically all cases indicate that all these models may be plausible representations of the data and indeed, the correlation coefBcients, R, are greater than 0.9. Thus, statistical compliance is not a sufficient basis for model discrimination. Specifically, the thermodynamic consistency of the estimates, as proposed by Boudart et al. [3], is appropriate further scrutinizing criterion during kinetic modelling and has been gainfully employed in other reactions [4-6]. [Pg.543]

As shown in Sect. 2, the fracture envelope of polymer fibres can be explained not only by assuming a critical shear stress as a failure criterion, but also by a critical shear strain. In this section, a simple model for the creep failure is presented that is based on the logarithmic creep curve and on a critical shear strain as the failure criterion. In order to investigate the temperature dependence of the strength, a kinetic model for the formation and rupture of secondary bonds during the extension of the fibre is proposed. This so-called Eyring reduced time (ERT) model yields a relationship between the strength and the load rate as well as an improved lifetime equation. [Pg.81]

Aging becomes a difficult problem to study in practice, because it proceeds too slow in use conditions (typical lifetime of years). It is then necessary to make accelerated aging tests to build kinetic models that describe the time changes of the material s behaviour, and to use these models to predict the durability from a conventional lifetime criterion. Indeed, the pertinence of the choice of accelerated aging conditions, the mathematical form of kinetic model, and lifetime criterion has to be proved. Empirical models are highly questionable in this domain because they have to be used in extrapolations for which they are not appropriate. [Pg.431]

The kinetic model accounting for the adsorption mechanism (119) cannot have rate self-oscillations since, in this case, Bendikson criterion is met... [Pg.44]

One major advantage of the PMod software is the graphical interface that allows the interactive configuration of the kinetic model by the user as well as the application of some preprocessing steps, e g. setting up initial values and limits for the fit parameters. Visual evaluation of each plot is performed to check the quality of each fit. Each model curve is compared with the corresponding time-activity curve and the total X2 difference was used as the cost function, where the criterion was to minimise the summed squares (X2) of the differences between the measured and the model curve. The distribution at each individual point is taken to be Gaussian, with a standard deviation to be specified. The model parameters are usually accepted when kl-k4 is less than one and the vb value exceeds zero. The unit for the rate constants kl-k4 is 1/min, while vb reflects the fraction of blood within the evaluated volume. [Pg.194]

The point to notice is that a threshold level of stored energy in the bond is necessary before AG -> 0 and thus before the forward reaction can proceed. This stored energy is, of course, equal to AG and thus (when normalised) to the surface energy of the material. Thus we see that the kinetic model of fracture requires a minimum energy supply equal to the surface energy, which is the fracture criterion employed by Griffith. No contradiction therefore exists between the kinetic and Griffith theories. [Pg.9]

Next, it was declared that the comparison of calculations with selected experiments cannot be used as a universal criterion for model development and selection of rate constants, or should be restricted and at least performed very carefully. The values of the kinetic parameters were taken from independent measurements, theoretical calculations, or semi-empirical estimations. So, the invariability of rate constants for the description of any particular experiments was accepted as the one of the main principle. [Pg.189]

Tissue action level - link sediment concentration to safe tissue concentration (e.g., FDA action level or body burden-response data) through application of equilibrium or kinetic models (numerical criterion). [Pg.118]

The disadvantage of this thermodynamic criterion is that it can be used only in combination with a purification procedure. Thus, if such a procedure is not available, the purity of a surfactant solution with respect to its useful interfacial study caimot be checked. Therefore, a second criterion was developed, which is based on an adsorption kinetics model. If adsorption of both, the main component and the impurity is assumed to be diffusion-controlled, the difference between the surface tension values, measured after a definite time t j after adsorption and desorption, respectively, is a measure of the purity of the solution. [Pg.147]

Analysis by applying the thermodynamic criterion. One has to face similar challenges when using the mediod to reduce an excessive kinetic model of a complex chemical reaction, based on the ideas of the step contribution in the reaction s Gibbs free energy [50,51]. [Pg.39]

Within the frame of the value approach a new numerical method is proposed for the identification and study of critical phenomena in branched chain reactions, according to their kinetic models. As a criterion for the critical states of a reaction system its state of extreme behavior is proposed. This allows to consider the initial conditions and parameters of the reaction system as controlling parameters, on the base of which the critical states of reactions are searched. Calcnlations are performed using the Maximum Principle with simultaneous revealing the value characteristics for individual steps and chemical species. With the help of value quantities the chemical content of critical states for nonbranching chain reactions are numerically illuminated. [Pg.93]

As a criterion of step unimportance a condition is chosen according to which the exclusion of low-valuable steps from the reaction kinetic model should result in changes in the current concentrations of RH, InH, In, ROOM, ROO at no more than 3.5%. Monitoring was performed for two reaction times corresponding to 10-20% and 60-70% conversions of BHT. Preliminary ranking of the steps by their value contributions was carried out in the time... [Pg.165]

Using the value excess criterion for individual steps we succeeded in revelation of the base mechanism including 36 steps that ensured deviation no more than 6% between the calculated data and primary calculation for the initial kinetic model (53 individual steps). [Pg.168]

First, Equation 11.55 was solved in order to find the hydrocracking kinetic model parameters a, Oq, a, 8, and Then, by using these values. Equation 11.71 was resolved and the parameters p, and were found. All routines were written in MATLAB software. The criterion of minimization of the sum of square errors (SSE) obtained from the difference of calculated and experimental points was employed to determine all model parameters. More details of numerical solution of Equation 11.55 can be found elsewhere (Elizalde and Ancheyta, 2011). [Pg.446]

The voltammograms at the microhole-supported ITIES were analyzed using the Tomes criterion [34], which predicts ii3/4 — iii/4l = 56.4/n mV (where n is the number of electrons transferred and E- i and 1/4 refer to the three-quarter and one-quarter potentials, respectively) for a reversible ET reaction. An attempt was made to use the deviations from the reversible behavior to estimate kinetic parameters using the method previously developed for UMEs [21,27]. However, the shape of measured voltammograms was imperfect, and the slope of the semilogarithmic plot observed was much lower than expected from the theory. It was concluded that voltammetry at micro-ITIES is not suitable for ET kinetic measurements because of insufficient accuracy and repeatability [16]. Those experiments may have been affected by reactions involving the supporting electrolytes, ion transfers, and interfacial precipitation. It is also possible that the data was at variance with the Butler-Volmer model because the overall reaction rate was only weakly potential-dependent [35] and/or limited by the precursor complex formation at the interface [33b]. [Pg.397]


See other pages where Criterion kinetic models is mentioned: [Pg.168]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.2648]    [Pg.2652]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.934]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.270]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.45 ]




SEARCH



Criterion kinetics

Kinetical criterion

Models criteria

© 2024 chempedia.info