Core fuel

The critical technology development areas are advanced materials, manufacturing techniques, and other advancements that will lower costs, increase durability, and improve reliability and performance for all fuel cell systems and applications. These activities need to address not only core fuel cell stack issues but also balance of plant (BOP) subsystems such as fuel processors hydrogen production, delivery, and storage power electronics sensors and controls air handling equipment and heat exchangers. Research and development areas include ... 

The paper elements can be folded into various forms which appear as pleated, star-shaped or V-shaped patterns. These elements are wrapped or coiled around a central porous metal core. Fuels generally flow from the outside shell of the filter inward through the filter media and up through the central core of the filter to the fuel pump feed line. 

Reactor core fuel -type - enrichment by 235U, %, maximum -average burn-up, MWday/kg -fuel cycle, eff. days, minimum - number of refuellings Based on UO2 w/multi-layer coatings 20 125 900 3... 

The fuel elements in a reactor core consist of cylindrical pellets about 0.6 in (1.5 cm) thick and 0.4 in (1.0 cm) in diameter. These pellets are stacked one on top of another in a hollow cylindrical tube known as the fuel rod and then inserted into the reactor core. Fuel rods tend to be about 12 ft (3.7 m) long and about 0.5 in (1.3 cm) in diameter. They are arranged in a grid pattern containing more than 200 rods each at the center of the reactor. The materials that fuel these pellets are made of must be replaced on a regular basis as the proportion of fissionable nuclei within them decreases. 

In this reactor type water is brought to its boiling point in the reactor core at a pressure of 70 bar. The resulting steam is directly fed from the pressurized reactor vessel to turbines. Fuel element bundles, each consisting of fuel rods in a lattice-like (6 x 6 to 8 x 7) array are to be found in the reactor core. The core fuel consists of - U-enriched... 

Because both zinc and magnesium are volatile, these acceptor alloy elements are separated from the actinides by vacuum distillation. The zinc-magnesium overhead product from vacuum distillation is recycled. After the volatile solvent metals are removed, the resultant distillation bottom products (U-Pu for core fuel and U for blanket fuel) are converted to suitable oxides by reaction with oxygen. The oxide products are available for refabrication into new fuel. The FP-3 elements that follow plutonium and the... 

Burnup of Core Fuel 59,519 MWD/Ton (Core/Axial Blanket)... 

Kl. Kearney, J. P. Simulation and Optimization Techniques for Nuclear In-Core Fuel Management Decisions, thesis submitted to the Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree, 1973. 

Fuel in the core of the LMFBR is operated at a specific power over three times that of the LWR. During the cooling period, the speciflc power of LMFBR core fuel from radioactive decay remains about three times that of LWR fuel cooled for the same length of time. This... 

The necessity for reliable and uninterrupted cooling of irradiated LMFBR fuel can be seen from its rate of adiabatic temperature rise owing to radioactive decay. From Table 10.20, the average specific power of core fuel cooled 150 days is 0.052 W/g HM. At a nominal specific heat of 0.08 cal/(g °C) for UO2 or PUO2, the adiabatic rate of temperature rise is... 

Wolf 1. R. 1979. Linear variable differential transformer and its uses for in-core fuel rod behavior measurements. International Colloquium on Irradiation for Reactor Safety Programmes. Petten, Netherlands 23. 

Initial core Equilibrium core Fuel inventory Core (U+Pu metal)... 

FUEL AND REACTOR CORE Fuel Type 17x17 Square FA... 

Core / Fuel Type Once-through helical coil type... 

SURVEY/THERM (Ref. 5) An analytical/finite-difference, core-survey code which calculates the steady-state, full-core fuel and graphite temperature distributions, fuel particle burnup distributions, and fluence distributions. 

In 1996, all scheduled studies on the uranium-thorium fuel cycle were completed on the CBR-22 critical assembly with the core containing metal enriched uranium and metallic thorium. The high enrichment of the core fuel ( 20%) caused quite rigid neutron spectrum (neutron fraction having energy lower than 10 KeV did not exceed 1%). 

In spite of their low radioactivity level, all the primary circuit wastes are to be disposed, their volume significantly exceeding that of the spent core fuel subassemblies. 

The second stage corresponds to complete replacement of the core. Fuel assemblies bought from UNC (USA), with U-Al alloy (93% enrichment) and 18 flat fuel plates, were used. In this stage, the core was converted from LEU to HEU. Also during this stage, the control rods were changed from rod type to fork type (plates). The control FAs were made by CERCA (France), using U-Al alloy (93% enrichment) and flat plates. 

In addition to the MOX fuel fabrication at the Plutonium Fuel Fabrication Facility for Joyo, Fugen (ATR), and BWRs in Japan, a new Plutonium Fuel Production Facility (PFPF) was constructed at Tokai Works of PNC. PFPF started production of initial core fuel of Monju in October 1989 and completed in January 1994. 

An investigation to improve prediction capability of Doppler reactivity experiment in critical assemblies was performed. The calculation/experiment (C/E) values were extremely underestimated by the conventional method with a cell group constant set and isolated lump nwdel. A new calculation with ultra-fine energy group cross-sections was applied to the Doppler experiments, and resulted in the improvement of CYE values by 13%. From the present survey, it is found quite significant for the Doppler reactivity analysis to take into account the interaction effect between Doppler samples and core fuel. 

Upper blanket fuel pellet Core fuel pellet... 

Wire spacer Core fuel pin Wrapper lube... 

The reactor that first succeeded in generating electricity was not the LWR, which has been commercialized, but the FR. Thereafter in the USA, many FRs such as the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, EBR-II and FFTF were constructed and operated. Test data have been accumulated from these reactors through R D for core fuel, structural materials, neutronic characteristics of core, safety, and so on. CRBR with 380 MWe power output passed the safety review in 1975, and the construction began. However, the nuclear policy changed during President Carter s administration, and the constmction was called off. 

The isotope burns out in the closed fuel cycle of a fast reactor, while plutonium is an integral and inseparable part of fuel (a catalyst for burning) and stays at all times incorporated in highly active materials. The international fuel cycle centers are expected to provide services to nuclear power complexes with fast reactors of the proposed type by producing only the first-core fuel and the makeup fuel, required for bringing NPPs into service, till the fuel cycle is closed. For the rest of the time, the plants will rely for their operation on the fuel they will breed, and will be independent from the foreign fuel suppliers. 

The IPWR has a large inventory of primary coolant that is contained entirely widiin the RPV and, thus, is immediately accessible to the core fuel. A large coolant inventory provides a large heat sink and a correspondingly long response time during accident events to initiate protective measures. 

---