Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Controller performance monitoring multivariable control systems

Several statistics from the models can be used to monitor the performance of the controller. Square prediction error (SPE) gives an indication of the quality of the PLS model. If the correlation of all variables remains the same, the SPE value should be low, and indicate that the model is operating within the limits for which it was developed. Hotelling s 7 provides an indication of where the process is operating relative to the conditions used to develop the PLS model, while the Q statistic is a measure of the variability of a sample s response relative to the model. Thus the use of a multivariate model (PCA or PLS) within a control system can provide information on the status of the control system. [Pg.537]

The monitoring uses formulas that take into account feed flow rates, targets calculated by the optimization layer of multivariable control, controlled variables upper and lower limits and other parameters. The economic benefits are based on the degrees of freedom and the active constraints at the steady state predicted by the linear model embedded in the controller. In order to improve the current monitoring, parameters dealing with process variability will be incorporated in the formulas. By doing this, it will be also possible to quantify external disturbances that affect the performance of the advanced control systems and identify regulatory control problems. [Pg.495]

TJ Harris, CT Seppala, and LD Desborough. A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. J. Process Control, 9 1-17, 1999. [Pg.284]

J Schaefer and A Cinar. Multivariable MPC system performance assessment, monitoring, and diagnosis. J. Process Control, 14(2) 113-129, 2004. [Pg.297]

The test samples should always be analyzed in random order to avoid the introduction of unwanted biases and time trends. A way to monitor such unwanted effects is to utilize quality control (QC) samples as a means to effectively examine system performance. QC samples are often made by pooling together subaliquots of biological test samples (29-31). This way a representative bulk sample is generated that should contain all metabolites present in the test samples. QC samples are typically analyzed through the analytical batch and data from the QC injections are scrutinized as a separate dataset by both multivariate analysis but also as typical LC-MS data. Data should pass certain criteria to ensure adequate quality of the dataset, that is, the number of zero values (which should be less than 40%), the CV% of the peak areas (should be less than 30% for a trustworthy peak), the number of peaks that pass the 30% CV filter (which should be higher than 70% in the dataset), the repeatability of retention times and peak areas, and so forth (29). [Pg.220]

An overview of single-loop CPM is presented in Section 9.1. Section 9.2 surveys CPM tools for multivariable controllers. Monitoring of MPC performance and a case study based on MPC of an evaporator model and a supervisory knowledge-based system (KBS) is presented in Section 9.3 to illustrate the methodology. The extension of CPM to web and sheet processes is discussed in Section 10.3. [Pg.233]


See other pages where Controller performance monitoring multivariable control systems is mentioned: [Pg.3]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.394]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



Control performance

Control systems monitoring system

Control systems multivariable

Controller performance

Monitor system

Monitoring system

Multivariable control

Multivariable systems

System performance

© 2024 chempedia.info