Continuous improvement evaluation individual

In 1999, the Board of Commissions established an Oversight Task Force for the Accreditation Process Improvement (API) Initiative. The purpose is to oversee the continuous improvement in the accreditation process. The resulting changes are intended to enhance the evaluation of critical patient safety and patient care functions and to achieve an accreditation process that remains consultative and focused on performance improvement. A white paper was published outlining a future operational model that will continue to build and expand on technology, performance data, presurvey self-assessments, a fully automated interface with JCAHO, increased surveyor development, and a more continuous accreditation process. Instead of a once every 3 years site visit, two 18-month site visits would occur that evaluate select standards. In addition, since health care entities are so diverse, there is a desire to create a model that is more data driven, less predictable, and more customized to an individual organization. 

Further discussion on the numerical criteria to be used for evaluating TPIs can be found in ASTM standard D 6792. Some laboratories prefer to compare their standard deviation against the test method reproducibility or to use an inverse calculation from that given above. In either case an individual best laboratory will consistently produce a superior precision compared to the industry average precision. Such periodic performance feedback should be a key feature of any continuous improvement program. 

The responsible party shall continuously improve health, safety and the environment by identifying the processes, activities and products in need of improvement, and implementing necessary improvement measures. The measures shall be followed up and the effects evaluated. The individual employee shall be encouraged to actively identify weaknesses and suggest solutions, cf. Section r5 of the Framework Regulations. Applying experience from own and others activities shall be facilitated in the improvement work. ... 

Measuring is necessary if one is committed to continuous improvement. It indicates variances to goal, and also helps in the evaluation of individuals who have safety-related accountabilities. Timely and consistent measurements in any effective safety program can not be understated. ... 

The individual chent evaluates the factual assessment results against his or her own requirements and agrees with the logistics service provider on priorities for continuous improvement. 

On the other hand, numbers that measure the quantity and quality of process activities related to safety performance provide the context needed to motivate individual and team responsibility. They direct continuous improvement of the process. Chapter 19 in Section 6 of this Handbook presents more details on developing a process-based evaluation system for continuously improving safety. The following chapters in Section 5 recommend a variety of additional strategies for cultivating a work culture that promotes actively caring behavior. 

I have met very few employees who respect and appreciate annual performance appraisals. They do not see the evaluations as being fair, objective, and motivational. I am sure you know department heads and supervisors who complete performance appraisals only because it is mandatory. They are not interested in providing constructive, performance-focused feedback for continuous improvement. They do not maintain ongoing records of employees accomplishments and less-than-adequate performance. Instead, they typically wait until a few days before appraisals are due and then make their best-guess estimate of an individual s ranking, using nebulous performance dimensions like "competent," "enthusiastic," "self-motivated," "cooperative," "responsive to feedback," and "willing to improve."... 

Continuously improve operations and accountability to achieve higher levels of safety culture, technology, management, and overall company performance. Individuals at all levels should collectively, actively and systematically identily, evaluate, develop, and promote adoption of best practices and lessons learned to continually improve performance and increase their capacity to achieve desired results. A successful continuous improvement element requires the following ... 

Assessments—There are several types of assessment self-assessment, independent assessment, masnagement assessment, etc., but regardless of the type, all assessments focus on performance rather than compliance and are intended to help drive continuous improvement. Assessments do not ignore unsafe conditions and unsafe acts but their goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of work and safety system performance. Like inspections, assessments are conducted either by teams or individuals. 

Develop Policies and Plans That Support Individual and Community Health Efforts. This service requires leadership development at all levels of public health systematic community- and state-level planning for health improvement in all jurisdictions development and tracking of measurable health objectives as a part of continuous quality improvement strategies joint evaluation with the medical system to define consistent policy regarding prevention and treatment services and development of codes, regulations, and legislation to guide the practice of public health. 

Evaluating the program s impact on public trust is more complicated. Although Responsible Care may have helped arrest the precipitous decline in trust that marked the early to mid-1980s, industry polls continue to reveal low overall levels of public confidence in the industry. To address the concerns of its diverse stakeholders, the chemical industry has formed hundreds of community advisory councils and partnerships with community and environmental activists in an attempt to hear their points of view (see Section 6.7). While individual companies report improved community relations and while the industry is much more open than it has ever been, polls indicate that it remains low in the public s esteem (Moffet, 1999). 

Today, the demand for enantiomerically pure compounds is continuously increasing, not only for use in pharmaceuticals but also in other areas such as agrochemicals, flavor and aroma chemicals, and specialty materials. Recently, strict government regulations that require the individual evaluation of all possible stereoisomers of a compound and the commercialization of a chiral product only as single enantiomer have called for further improvements in the stereoselective synthesis of chiral compounds. While the catalyst usually allows the reaction to be operated under mild condihons, the economic benefits of an efficient catalyhc process are also enormous as it is less capital intensive, has lower operahng costs, produces higher-purity products and fewer byproducts. In addihon, a substoichio-metric process may provide important environmental benefits. 

---