Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Constraints on flows and compositions

It is obvious, but worth emphasising, that the sum of the individual component flows in any stream cannot exceed the total stream flow. Also, that the sum of the individual molar or weight fractions must equal 1. Hence, the composition of a stream is completely defined if all but one of the component concentrations are given. [Pg.41]

The component flows in a stream (or the quantities in a batch) are completely defined by any of the following  [Pg.42]

The feed stream to a reactor contains ethylene 16 per cent, oxygen 9 per cent, nitrogen 31 per cent, and hydrogen chloride. If the ethylene flow is 5000 kg/h, calculate the individual component flows and the total stream flow. All percentages are by weight. [Pg.42]

General rule the ratio of the flow of any component to the flow of any other component is the same as the ratio of the compositions of the two components. [Pg.42]

The flow of any component in Example 2.6 could have been calculated directly from the ratio of the percentage to that of ethylene, and the ethylene flow. [Pg.42]


The split-fraction coefficients can be estimated by considering the function of the process unit, and by making use of any constraints on the stream flows and compositions that arise from considerations of product quality, safety, phase equilibria, other thermodynamic relationships and general process and mechanical design considerations. The procedure is similar to the techniques used for the manual calculation of material balances discussed in Section 4.3. [Pg.185]

The constraints on m1 and m4 are explicit. The lower limit of m, however, does not depend on the other flow rate ratios, whereas the upper limit of m4 is an explicit function of the flow rate ratios m2 and m3 and of the feed composition respectively [25]. The constraints on m2 and m3 are implicit (see Eq. 4), but they do not depend on m1 and m4. Therefore, they define a unique region of complete separation in the (m2, m3) plane, which is the triangle-shaped region abw in Fig. 4. The boundaries of this region can be calculated explicitly in terms of the adsorption equilibrium parameters and the feed composition as follows [25] ... [Pg.219]

When a specific feed composition is given, the constraints on m1 and m4 as well as the complete separation region in the (m2, m3) plane can be determined,since these depend only on the parameters of the adsorption equilibrium isotherms and the feed composition itself. Based on these values an operating point can be selected, i. e. a set of four values of = 1,..., 4 fulfilling the complete separation requirements. Since the flow rate ratios are dimensionless groups combining column volumes, flow rates and switching intervals, the constraints on the flow rate ratios are independent of the size and productivity of the SMB unit. [Pg.223]

When no reactions occur the number of independent equations contributed by each balance is equal to the number of components in the streams. Balances in terms of total flows and composition fractions (as in Example 7.3) must also satisfy a constraint equation on the sum of fractions in each stream 7,... [Pg.168]

The values of the split-fraction coefficients will depend on the function of the processing unit and the constraints on the stream flow-rates and compositions. Listed below are suggested first trial values, and the basis for selecting the particular value for each component. [Pg.177]

In the formulation of Bickel et al. (B7) which appears to be the most general formulation on this problem to date, both the feed and delivery conditions (temperature, pressure, flow rate, and composition) are specified. As before, the decision variables include the pipe diameters. But in addition, the number, placement, suction, and delivery pressures of compressors may also be varied within the constraints of overall pipeline lengths and network... [Pg.181]

Formulation of the mathematical model here adopts the usual assumptions of equimolar overflow, constant relative volatility, total condenser, and partial reboiler. Binary variables denote the existence of trays in the column, and their sum is the number of trays N. Continuous variables represent the liquid flow rates Li and compositions xj, vapor flow rates Vi and compositions yi, the reflux Ri and vapor boilup VBi, and the column diameter Di. The equations governing the model include material and component balances around each tray, thermodynamic relations between vapor and liquid phase compositions, and the column diameter calculation based on vapor flow rate. Additional logical constraints ensure that reflux and vapor boilup enter only on one tray and that the trays are arranged sequentially (so trays cannot be skipped). Also included are the product specifications. Under the assumptions made in this example, neither the temperature nor the pressure is an explicit variable, although they could easily be included if energy balances are required. A minimum and maximum number of trays can also be imposed on the problem. [Pg.6]

The essence of this particular formulation is the control of tray existence (governed by and the consequences for the continuous variables. In the rectifying section, all trays above the tray on which the reflux enters have no liquid flows, which eliminates any mass transfer on these trays where g = 0. The vapor composition does not change above this tray even though vapor flows remain constant. Similarly, in the stripping section, all trays below the tray on which the vapor boilup enters have no vapor flows and the liquid composition does not change below this tray even though liquid flows remain constant. The reflux and boilup constraints ensure that the reflux and boilup enter on only one tray. [Pg.8]

Here x represents a vector of n continuous variables (e.g., flows, pressures, compositions, temperatures, sizes of units), and y is a vector of integer variables (e.g., alternative solvents or materials) h(x,y) = 0 denote the to equality constraints (e.g., mass, energy balances, equilibrium relationships) g(x,y) < 0 are the p inequality constraints (e.g., specifications on purity of distillation products, environmental regulations, feasibility constraints in heat recovery systems, logical constraints) f(x,y) is the objective function (e.g., annualized total cost, profit, thermodynamic criteria). [Pg.111]

Fewer reliable osmium isotopic data exist for Precambrian samples owing to the problems of disturbance of rhenium and osmium during alteration and metamorphism. Key points used to define mantle evolution are indicated in Figure 7. The osmium isotopic constraints on the composition of the Archean mantle are, in many cases, derived from Late Archean komatiite suites. Komatiites are high-MgO lavas that often form differentiated flow sequences, such that Re-Os isochrons can be determined chromite-rich layers are commonly present and provide a robust estimate of the initial osmium isotopic... [Pg.1203]

Rehnements of the Taylor and McLennan (1985) model are provided by McLennan and Taylor (1996) and McLennan (2001b). The latter is a modihcation of several trace-element abundances in the upper crust and as such, should not affect their compositional model for the bulk crust, which does not rely on their upper crustal composition. Nevertheless, McLennan (2001b) does provide modihed bulk-crust estimates for niobium, rubidium, caesium, and tantalum (and these are dealt with in the footnotes of Table 9). McLennan and Taylor (1996) revisited the heat-flow constraints on the proportions of mahc and felsic rocks in the Archean crust and revised the proportion of Archean-aged crust to propose a more evolved bulk crust composition. This revised composition is derived from a mixture of 60% Archean cmst (which is a 50 50 mixture of mahc and felsic end-member lithologies), and 40% average-andesite cmst of Taylor (1977). McLennan and Taylor (1996) focused on potassium, thorium, and uranium, and did not provide amended values for other elements, although other incompatible elements will be higher (e.g., rubidium, barium, LREEs) and compatible elements lower in a cmst composition so revised. [Pg.1313]

Selecting and sizing equipment to perform a single process step is an easy step in process design when the temperature, pressure, and composition of the streams are known. It is much more difficult to find the operating conditions of all the streams to and from each piece of equipment when they are connected to form a continuous flow process. The overall plant optimization calculations get progressively more difficult as the number of process steps increase and constraints on process streams are added to meet all the design objectives for the plant. [Pg.815]

The symbols are P for profit, / for equality constraints, g for inequality constraints, x for optimization variables, y for dependent variables, and / (constant) for updated parameters. The objective function is a scalar measure of plant profit it is usually the instantaneous profit ( /hr), because the optimization variables do not involve the time value of money. Typical equality constraints include material and energy balances, heat and mass transfer relationships, and thermodynamic and kinetic models, and typical inequality constraints include equipment limitations limit compressor horsepower, and distillation tray hydraulics. The optimization variables are flow rates, pressures, temperatures, and other variables that can be manipulated directly. The dependent variables involve intermediate values required for the detailed models for example, all distillation tray compositions, flow rates, and temperatures. Because of the fundamental models often used in RTO, the number of dependent variables can be quite large, on the order of hundreds of thousands. [Pg.2592]

The carbonate minerals in these sandstones are especially interesting in this regard because it is possible to compare their compositions with those of similar phases of documented Alleghanian association in the thrust Lower Palaeozoic carbonate units to the southeast. Marked differences between carbonate mineral compositions in the relatively undeformed foreland (reported here) and those in the fold and thrust belt (reported in the literature), suggest constraints on models for fluid flow during Alleghanian orogenesis. [Pg.88]

Geological, petrological, geochemical, and geophysical observations each provides important constraints on the composition and evolution of the continental crust and combine to allow some broad generalizations. Thus the heat-flow data indicate that the composition of the readily observable upper crust cannot persist below about 10 km, so that the lower crust is in many ways a distinct geochemical entity. [Pg.3]

The interpretation of the heat-flow data is not without problems. These will be discussed more fully when we come to consider the constraints that the data place on the bulk composition of the Archean crust. There is a well-established difference between the heat flow in Archean and later Precambrian terrains. Originally, these differences were attributed to differing crustal abundances between Archean and Post-Archean stabilized crust. It appears that the principal controlling factor is not only the crustal abundances of the heat-producing elements but also the thickness of the subcrustal lithosphere. [Pg.7]


See other pages where Constraints on flows and compositions is mentioned: [Pg.41]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.1286]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.1759]    [Pg.2680]    [Pg.819]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.362]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.41 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.41 ]




SEARCH



Composition constraint (

Compositional constraints

On-flow

© 2024 chempedia.info