Confidence in Results

Software tools for computational chemistry are often based on empirical information. To use these tools, you need to understand how the technique is implemented and the nature of the database used to parameterize the method. You use this knowledge to determine the most appropriate tools for specific investigations and to define the limits of confidence in results. 

Communicating in a manner that accurately portrays risk and the nature of confidence in results is integral to and a major challenge for practitioners of probabilistic risk assessment. Inadequate communication of scientific uncertainty about the effect, severity, or prevalence of a hazard tends to increase unease among decision makers, stakeholders, and other participants. Efforts of the risk assessors should provide clarity for decision makers who must in turn bear ultimate responsibility for communicating the parameters of any decision. The risk assessor will work within a framework that must be clearly communicated by decision makers during the problem formulation. Decision makers at the outset of the risk assessment process must articulate the following points ... 

Why do we claim that our text is advanced We believe that the methods and programs presented here can handle a number of realistic problems with the power and sophistication needed by professionals and with simple, step - by -step introductions for students and beginners. In spite of their broad range of applicability, the subroutines are simple enough to be completely understood and controlled, thereby giving more confidence in results than software packages with unknown source code. 

The application of statistics to support analytical results is usually the final step in reporting. Statistics can reveal much information about the determined result and ensure confidence in results. It can be applied in several ways and one of its most effective uses is the generation of the control charts to monitor the routine analysis of samples to determine whether the preparation of standards and instrument parameters are correct and no contamination has crept into the sample, reagents and instrument or during sample preparation. A control chart is generated from a control standard and is a visual display of confidence in the method. It can warn the operator if the sample/insfrument parameters are in, or out of, control and whether corrections are necessary before proceeding with the analysis. 

Risk assessment frequently involves estimating safe exposure concentrations for exposure durations that were not tested experimentally. Generally applicable biologically based models have to be applied. Before developing such a model, extensive data are needed to build its form as well as to estimate how well it conforms to the observed data to support confidence in results. 

Hyphenated analytical methods usually give rise to increased confidence in results, enable the handling of more complex samples, improve detection Limits, and minimize method development time. This approach normally results in increased instmmental complexity and cost, increased user sophistication, and the need to handle enormous amounts of data. The analytical chemist must, however, remain cognizant of the need to use proper analytical procedures in sample preparations to aid in improved sensitivity and not rely solely on additional instmmentation to increase detection levels. 

The confidence in results is important in the examination of distributions. This is considered in the calculation of the distribution statistics per se, but generally the greater the number of samples analyzed to calculate a distribu-... 

This also results in mixture of heterogeneous methods and procedures used for solving partial tasks while solving complex risk tasks. Moreover, combination of detailed and descriptive calculations is used along with accurate and inaccurate data and quantities. Some cases are known, where quantitative values are input for qualitative procedures, which results in reversal transformation of qualitative evaluation into quantitative results for risk calculation. Result of this status is that there is not sufficient confidence in results of calculations and risk assessment. 

There are a finite number of methods described in the sensory literature and a very large number of modifications, many of which are based on a need to try a different method, or belief that a modified method will improve results. In most instances, the modifications are driven by a statistical, not a behavioral approach. Increasing the power of a test is a goal and certainly will have a significant impact on the results, but how much more power can be achieved if one is not using qualified subjects. Confidence in results derives from knowing what subjects were used, the chosen design, and the analysis of the data. 

Retention-time locking provides the immediate benefits of increased sample throughput, greater confidence in results, easier analysis for compliance, and lower costs of sample analysis. All you need is a GC equipped with the RTL software, EPC, and a GC ChemStation. With RTL, all peaks match and elution order is constant. Retention-time locking eliminates the need to update calibration tables, timed events tables, and integration events tables when a method is transferred, a new column is installed, or routine maintenance is performed. 

The normal error curve is the basis of a number of statistical tests that can be applied to analytical data to assess the effects of indeterminate errors, to compare values and to establish levels of confidence in results (Topics B2 and B3). 

In the evaluation of quality attributes one has to be aware of the limitations of the technology, which are discussed by Gtinay and Jasper (Giinay and Jasper, 2010). In addition, note that using equipment for solution and dispersion preparation in conjunction with the low-cost electronic dispensing pipette for dyebath preparation increases confidence in results and improves repeatability of tests. 

---