Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conductance, specific methanol

The increase in conductivity is due to increase in dissolved surfactant, and this increase continues until all the crystallites dissolve. The peak in specific conductance is attained when the microemulsion is formed and the specific conductance levels off. The plateau of Figure 6 is often referred to as a "percolation threshold" (] ) and is reached when there is a disordered interspersion capable of bicontinuous structures ( ). Further addition of methanol results in a lowering of conductivity explained by the solution eventually approaching the conductivity of methanol. This is the region of molecular dispersion. These conductivity curves are similar to those observed by Lagues and Santerey (13) on a system of water, cyclohexane, sodium dodecylsulfate and 1-pentanol. [Pg.292]

Many other inorganic materials such as Caj (PO ), BPO, ZrPO, etc., when blended with Nafion membranes will show improvement on the membranes properties such as thermal stability, proton conductivity, and lower methanol permeation. Nafion doped with cesium cations also show evidence of good performance in the operation of DMFCs. The presence of cesium ions in the membrane, specifically in the water-rich domains, causes a ranarkable reduction of methanol permeation [43]. However, the proton conductivity could be depressed to a lesser extent by the presence of the cesium ions in the membrane. Nevertheless, at ambient conditions, the combined parameter of both proton conductivity and methanol permeabiUty shows better performance of Cs -doped membranes than the Nafion 117 membranes in the operation of DMFC. Table 15.1, shows permeability values for Nafion 117 membrane and four different Nafion 117 modified membranes. A reduction in the permeability values when the Nafion 117 membrane is modified with appropriate methanol inhibiting material can be seen. A very sharp reduction is particularly noticed in the case of Cs -doped manbrane. This indicates that exchange of by Cs cations is very effective in reducing methanol content in the hydrophilic domains of Nafion. [Pg.365]

The CE behaviour of inorganic anions in water-methanol mixtures has also been extensively studied. The specific conductivity a of electrolytes was converted into equivalent conductivity by... [Pg.48]

For micro PS a decrease in the specific resistivity by two or three orders of magnitude is observed if the dry material is exposed to humid air [Ma8] or vapors of polar solvents, e.g. methanol [Be6]. This sensitivity of PS to polar vapors can be used to design PS-based gas sensors, as discussed in Section 10.4. This change in resistivity with pore surface condition becomes dramatic if the pores are filled with an electrolyte. From the strong EL observed under low anodic as well as low cathodic bias in an electrolyte it can be concluded that micro PS shows a conductivity comparable to that of the bulk substrate under wet conditions [Ge8]. Diffusion doping has been found to reduce the PS resistivity by more than five orders of magnitude, without affecting the PL intensity [Ell]. [Pg.123]

The ionic conductivity of a solution depends on the viscosity, diffusivity, and dielectric constant of the solvent, and the dissociation constant of the molecule. EFL mixtures can carry charge. The conductivity of perfluoroacetate salts in EFL mixtures of carbon dioxide and methanol is large (10 to 10 " S/cm for salt concentrations of 0.05-5 mM) and increases with salt concentration. The ionic conductivity of tetra-methylammonium bicarbonate (TMAHCO3) in methanol/C02 mixtures has specific conductivities in the range of 9-14 mS/cm for pure methanol at pressures varying from 5.8 to 14.1 MPa, which decreases with added CO2 to a value of 1-2 mS/cm for 0.50 mole fraction CO2 for all pressures studied. When as much as 0.70 mole fraction... [Pg.430]

The electron will be solvated in a region where the solvent molecules are appropriately arranged. There must be a cluster of electrons of a size of 4-5 to support the formation of the solvated electron from the results of Gangwer et al., [23], Baxendale [24,25], and Kenney-Wallace and Jonah [16]. This behavior does not depend on the specific alcohol or alkane and even occurs in supercritical solutions, as has been shown in experiments done using mixtures of supercritical ethane-methanol mixtures [19]. Experiments have also shown that the thermodynamically lowest state might not be reached. For example, the experiments of Baxendale that measured the conductivity of the solvated electron in alcohol-alkane mixtures showed that when there was a sufficient concentration of alcohols to form dimers, there was a sharp decrease in the mobility of the electron [24,25]. This result showed that the electron was at least partially solvated. However, the conductivity was not as low as one would expect for the fully solvated electron, and the fully solvated electron was never formed on their time scale (many microseconds), a time scale that was sufficiently long for the electron-alcohol entity to encounter sufficient alcohols to fully solvate the electron. Similarly, the experiments of Weinstein and Firestone, in mixed polar solvents, showed that the electron that was observed depended on the initial mixture and would not relax to form the most fully solvated electron [26]. [Pg.163]

Figure 6 is a plot of specific conductance against mole ratios of methanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate. Like the viscosity data, there are three regions. In the first region, a rapid rise in conductance occurs, which indicates the formation of a microemulsion. It is in this region that the swollen micellar solution and liquid crystalline phase of methanol in bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate is breaking with the formation of microspheres that constitute the microemulsion (13). [Pg.287]

Figures 7, 8 and 9 are plots at 25 C of specific conductance and density versus volume fraction of methanol in 2/1 triolein/ surfactant systems which are 4/1 molar ratios of 2-octanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate, triethylammonium linoleate and tetradecyldimethylammonium linoleate, respectively. For each surfactant system, a maximum for specific conductance and a minimum for density was observed at the same volume fraction, but this volume fraction of methanol varied between the three surfactant systems. At volume fractions of methanol above these abrupt changes, each system exhibited translucence, and it appears that gel-like structures form. These data are consistent for microemulsion structures that are based largely on geometric considerations (16-18). Figures 7, 8 and 9 are plots at 25 C of specific conductance and density versus volume fraction of methanol in 2/1 triolein/ surfactant systems which are 4/1 molar ratios of 2-octanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate, triethylammonium linoleate and tetradecyldimethylammonium linoleate, respectively. For each surfactant system, a maximum for specific conductance and a minimum for density was observed at the same volume fraction, but this volume fraction of methanol varied between the three surfactant systems. At volume fractions of methanol above these abrupt changes, each system exhibited translucence, and it appears that gel-like structures form. These data are consistent for microemulsion structures that are based largely on geometric considerations (16-18).
Figure 6. Plot of specific conductance against amount of solubilized methanol in bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate at 298°K. Figure 6. Plot of specific conductance against amount of solubilized methanol in bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate at 298°K.
Figure 7. Plots at 298°K of specific conductance and density against volume fraction of methanol in a 2/1 triolein/ surfactant system which is a 4/1 molar ratio of 2-octanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate. Figure 7. Plots at 298°K of specific conductance and density against volume fraction of methanol in a 2/1 triolein/ surfactant system which is a 4/1 molar ratio of 2-octanol to bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate.
Analysis of antioxidant properties relative to the DPPH" radical involves observation of colour disappearance in the radical solution in the presence of the solution under analysis which contains antioxidants. A solution of extract under analysis is introduced to the environment containing the DPPH radical at a specific concentration. A methanol solution of the DPPH radical is purple, while a reaction with antioxidants turns its colour into yellow. Colorimetric comparison of the absorbance of the radical solution and a solution containing an analysed sample enables one to make calculations and to express activity as the percent of inhibition (IP) or the number of moles of a radical that can be neutralised by a specific amount of the analysed substance (mmol/g). In another approach, a range of assays are conducted with different concentrations of the analysed substance to determine its amount which inactivates half of the radical in the test solution (ECso). The duration of such a test depends on the reaction rate and observations are carried out until the absorbance of the test solution does not change [4]. If the solution contains substances whose absorbance disturbs the measurement, the concentration of DPPH radical is measured directly with the use of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. [Pg.103]

Polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) is considered as one of the most promising power sources for futurist s hydrogen economy. As shown in Fig. 1, operation of a Nation-based PEFC is dictated by transport processes and electrochemical reactions at cat-alyst/polymer electrolyte interfaces and transport processes in the polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM), in the catalyst layers consisting of precious metal (Pt or Ru) catalysts on porous carbon support and polymer electrolyte clusters, in gas diffusion layers (GDLs), and in flow channels. Specifically, oxidants, fuel, and reaction products flow in channels of millimeter scale and diffuse in GDL with a structure of micrometer scale. Nation, a sulfonic acid tetrafluorethy-lene copolymer and the most commonly used polymer electrolyte, consists of nanoscale hydrophobic domains and proton conducting hydrophilic domains with a scale of 2-5 nm. The diffusivities of the reactants (02, H2, and methanol) and reaction products (water and C02) in Nation and proton conductivity of Nation strongly depend on the nanostructures and their responses to the presence of water. Polymer electrolyte clusters in the catalyst layers also play a critical... [Pg.307]

The predicted2decremenj for an aqueous solution of conductivity a = 10 mho cm at 25C (corresponding to 0.1N NaCl) is then Ae = -0.62. Values of this order, but usually somewhat larger, are observed for salt solutions, as summarized for example by Hasted (27). Considerably larger decrements are expected for other solvents with longer relaxation times, which is consistent with the larger decrements for methanol solutions (with Tp = 52 ps) reported by Lestrade and coworkers (28). A rather spectacular example of large kinetic ion effects on permittivity is sulfuric acid with e = 95.0, t = 425 ps, and an intrinsic specific conductance a = 0.0104 mno cm-1 at 25C. [Pg.77]

As a specific example of the correlations we have observed, our experimental results demonstrate that the reactions of vanadium and niobium oxide cluster cations with methanol lead to dehydrogenation of methanol under single collision conditions producing neutral formaldehyde [16]. Formaldehyde is, indeed, a major product formed from methanol over condensed-phase vanadia surfaces [17]. Another study conducted in our laboratory showed that,, Clj products were formed during the reaction between certain clusters and CCl, leaving phosgene (COClj) as the most likely neutral product [15, 18]. The decomposition of... [Pg.294]


See other pages where Conductance, specific methanol is mentioned: [Pg.389]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.1160]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.2612]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.2619]    [Pg.904]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 ]




SEARCH



Methanol Specifications

Specific conductance

Specific conductivity

© 2024 chempedia.info