Composites incompatibility

ECR-1 is a true boundary phase between two compatible structures - mazzite and mordenite - which normally crystallize with greatly disparate Si/Al ratios (3.4 and >5 respectively). Yet ECR-1 has an Si/Al ratio identical to mazzite, even though half of its component sheets are structurally characteristic of mordenite (in the structure proposal). This compositional incompatibility is further reflected in the almost complete lack of mixtures of mazzite with mordenite in the experiments so far completed. The ongoing search for ECR-1 with mordenite overgrowths is therefore an important objective in the understanding of crystallization mechanisms in this system, with particular interest in the possible compositional variation between all three component zeolites. 

During the processing of reinforced composites, incompatibility between the reinforcements and the matrix materials can cause a variety of problems, due to the different chemical properties of the constituents, which results in very poor adhesion between them. A possible solution is the chemical modification of both the reinforcements and the matrix. A strong interfacial interaction is required for adequate load transfer. Strong adhesion between the phase and the reinforcements results in a poor phase-matrix relationship, because the phase border plays a key role in determining the properties of the composite. The efficiency of the load transfer between the reinforcement and the matrix is affected not only by molecules on the phase board, but also by other properties, such as thickness. 

Similarly, the random introduction by copolymerization of stericaHy incompatible repeating unit B into chains of crystalline A reduces the crystalline melting point and degree of crystallinity. If is reduced to T, crystals cannot form. Isotactic polypropylene and linear polyethylene homopolymers are each highly crystalline plastics. However, a random 65% ethylene—35% propylene copolymer of the two, poly(ethylene- (9-prop5lene) is a completely amorphous ethylene—propylene mbber (EPR). On the other hand, block copolymers of the two, poly(ethylene- -prop5iene) of the same overall composition, are highly crystalline. X-ray studies of these materials reveal both the polyethylene lattice and the isotactic polypropylene lattice, as the different blocks crystallize in thek own lattices. 

Copolymers are typically manufactured using weU-mixed continuous-stirred tank reactor (cstr) processes, where the lack of composition drift does not cause loss of transparency. SAN copolymers prepared in batch or continuous plug-flow processes, on the other hand, are typically hazy on account of composition drift. SAN copolymers with as Httle as 4% by wt difference in acrylonitrile composition are immiscible (44). SAN is extremely incompatible with PS as Httle as 50 ppm of PS contamination in SAN causes haze. Copolymers with over 30 wt % acrylonitrile are available and have good barrier properties. If the acrylonitrile content of the copolymer is increased to >40 wt %, the copolymer becomes ductile. These copolymers also constitute the rigid matrix phase of the ABS engineering plastics. 

Poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) yields truly compatible blends with poly(vinyl acetate) up to 20% PEMA concentration (133). Synergistic improvement in material properties was observed. Poly(ethylene oxide) forms compatible homogeneous blends with poly(vinyl acetate) (134). The T of the blends and the crystaUizabiUty of the PEO depend on the composition. The miscibility window of poly(vinyl acetate) and its copolymers with alkyl acrylates can be broadened through the incorporation of acryUc acid as a third component (135). A description of compatible and incompatible blends of poly(vinyl acetate) and other copolymers has been compiled (136). Blends of poly(vinyl acetate) copolymers with urethanes can provide improved heat resistance to the product providing reduced creep rates in adhesives used for vinyl laminating (137). 

Principal component analysis has been used in combination with spectroscopy in other types of multicomponent analyses. For example, compatible and incompatible blends of polyphenzlene oxides and polystyrene were distinguished using Fourier-transform-infrared spectra (59). Raman spectra of sulfuric acid/water mixtures were used in conjunction with principal component analysis to identify different ions, compositions, and hydrates (60). The identity and number of species present in binary and tertiary mixtures of polycycHc aromatic hydrocarbons were deterrnined using fluorescence spectra (61). 

Another example of favorable synergistic effects in ionomer/homopolymer blends is evident from a study of the tensile properties of blends of an SPS ionomer with PS. Over most of the composition range these two polymers are incompatible. For small additions of the SPS ionomer to PS, TEM studies of cast thin films show that... 

The study of filler distribution by the methods of optical and electronic microscopy has shown that in all compositions obtained by method 4 the filler is distributed rather uniformly as in an individual polymer. In the mixtures of incompatible polymers, obtained by methods 1 and 2, the filler is distributed nonuniformly and there are zones of high concentration of the filler and almost empty ones. The size of such zones is close to the size of polymer regions known for mixtures of thermodynamically incompatible polymers — 1 to 10 p. 

Indeed, the multi-layered model, applied to fiber reinforced composites, presented a basic inconsistency, as it appeared in previous publications17). This was its incompatibility with the assumption that the boundary layer, constituting the mesophase between inclusions and matrix, should extent to a thickness well defined by thermodynamic measurements, yielding jumps in the heat capacity values at the glass-transition temperature region of the composites. By leaving this layer in the first models to extent freely and tend, in an asymptotic manner, to its limiting value of Em, it was allowed to the mesophase layer to extend several times further, than the peel anticipated from thermodynamic measurements, fact which does not happen in its new versions. 

Nowadays economy and ecology render the reuse of the sulfite solution increasingly important. Normally the scrubber liquor is recovered as dilution water directly in the neutralization of sulfonation plant or in the slurry preparation unit of synthetic detergent plants. In some special cases, when the presence of sulfites is incompatible with the slurry composition, it is possible to install as optional a sulfite oxidation unit. This oxidation takes place with atmospheric air. 

---