Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Complex formation, interfacial

Modern attempts to formulate a quantitative theory of emulsions and emulsion stability have looked most closely at the nature of the interfacial region separating the two immiscible phases, especially the chemical and physical nature of the adsorbed film, the role of mixed films and complex formation, interfacial rheology, and steric and electronic factors at the interface. The theoretical foundations for current ideas concerning emulsion formation and stability are presented in several of the references cited in the Bibliography. A few of the most basic ideas, however, are presented below. [Pg.293]

The voltammograms at the microhole-supported ITIES were analyzed using the Tomes criterion [34], which predicts ii3/4 — iii/4l = 56.4/n mV (where n is the number of electrons transferred and E- i and 1/4 refer to the three-quarter and one-quarter potentials, respectively) for a reversible ET reaction. An attempt was made to use the deviations from the reversible behavior to estimate kinetic parameters using the method previously developed for UMEs [21,27]. However, the shape of measured voltammograms was imperfect, and the slope of the semilogarithmic plot observed was much lower than expected from the theory. It was concluded that voltammetry at micro-ITIES is not suitable for ET kinetic measurements because of insufficient accuracy and repeatability [16]. Those experiments may have been affected by reactions involving the supporting electrolytes, ion transfers, and interfacial precipitation. It is also possible that the data was at variance with the Butler-Volmer model because the overall reaction rate was only weakly potential-dependent [35] and/or limited by the precursor complex formation at the interface [33b]. [Pg.397]

Theoretical insight into the interfacial charge transfer at ITIES and detection mechanism of this type of sensor were considered [61-63], In case of ionophore assisted transport for a cation I the formation of ion-ionophore complexes in the organic (membrane) phase is expected, which can be described with the appropriate complex formation constant, /3ILnI. [Pg.118]

The concept sounds attractive, but there is a flaw in the explanation. Assuming an equilibrium situation between the two bulk phases and the interphase, complex formation at the interfacial region requires the same complexes are formed also in the bulk phases. Consequently, in order to produce a considerable amount of the mixed species MA, xBx in the liquid-liquid boundary layer some B must be dissolved in the aqueous, as weU as some A in the organic phase. Since by definition this condition is not met, the relative amount of M present at the interphase region as MAn xBx must be negligible. However, now the metal ion will be distributed between MA in the aqueous phase and MBp in the organic layer (n and p are the... [Pg.140]

In considering the impact of thermodynamically favourable interactions between biopolymers on the formation and stabilization of food colloids, a number of regular trends can be identified. One of the most important aspects is the effect of complexation on interfacial properties, including rates of adsorption and surface rheological behaviour. [Pg.266]

For SDS, the reaction proceeded to a reproducible end point rapidly —viz., 1 to 2 minutes—when nonionic surface active impurities such as parent dodecyl alcohol, DOH, were removed by ethyl ether extractions. This impurity effect was verified by adding traces of alkyl alcohol—viz., 1 X 10 9 mole per liter—to purified SDS, whereupon the penetration reaction rate was halved. A possible explanation for this behavior is that formation of an SDS-DOH interfacial complex reduced the SDS activity in the interface and consequently its rate of reaction with the protein monolayer. The reasons for the somewhat slower rate of reaction of Cetab with the protein film are more obscure. The reaction rate did not increase after extracting the detergent repeatedly. Two possible reasons for the time dependence in this case may have been that (1) the ether extraction method was not effective in removing surface active impurities, or (2) because of the greater bulk of the Cetab hydrocarbon chain, Ci6 vs. Ci2 for SDS, more time was required for diffusion and appropriate orientation before complex formation. [Pg.159]

Coacervation. If an oil phase is emulsified in a polymer water solution, and the polymer is precipitated (for example) by changing the pH, the polymer precipitate (coacervate) has a tendency to accumulate at the interface. This is the coacervation process called simple if one polymer is involved and complex if two polymers are involved. If the coacervation is obtained by dropping one polymer solution into a polymer solution of opposite charge, this is termed interfacial coacervation, or polyelectrolyte complex formation . [Pg.31]

The combination of resonance Raman microscope spectrometry and the CLM method allowed us to directly observe the Raman spectra of the liquid-liquid interface and the bulk phases by shifting the focal point of an objective lens. A schematic diagram of the measurement system is shown in Fig. 6. CLM/ Raman microscope spectrometry was applied in order to measure the rate of complex formation between Pd(II) and 5-Br-PADAP (HL) at the heptane-water interface and it was demonstrated that this method was highly useful for the kinetic measurement of the interfacial reaction [37],... [Pg.284]

The complex formation proceeded almost completely at the interface. The rate constant of k=5.3xl02M 1 s 1 was determined by a stopped-flow spectrometry in the region where the formation rate was independent of pH. The conditional interfacial rate constants represented by k[ = k k2 [HL] / (k2 + k i[H + ]) were larger in the heptane-water interface than the toluene-water interface, regardless of metal ions. The molecular dynamics simulation of the adsorptivities of 5-Br-PADAP in heptane-water and toluene-water interfaces suggested that 5-Br-PADAP could be absorbed at the interfacial region more closely to the aqueous phase, but 5-Br-PADAP in the toluene-water... [Pg.298]

We wished to develop a macroscopic model of the interactions between molecular ligands and receptors. Molecular recognition is a broad subject that describes selective assembly in chemistry and biology, with examples from DNA-protein complex formation to asymmetric catalysis. The principle behind molecular recognition dictates that the molecules that mate have complementary shapes and interfacial characteristics. Our extension of this principle to the mesoscale involved the self-assembly of objects that matched both... [Pg.124]

Therefore, we can conclude that the interfacial equilibria and the complex equilibria are connected by cations, here by Ca2+ and H+ ions. Both equilibria are characterized by the same Ca2+ and H+ concentrations. In Figure 2.11, we can see that the interfacial equilibrium can be described solely by the Ca2+ ion concentration. Complex formation influences the interfacial equilibrium only via the decrease of the Ca2+ ion concentration. The concentration of the Ca2+ ion can be calculated from Equations 2.38 and 2.45, or 2.42 and 2.35, respectively. From these equations we obtain... [Pg.124]

Colloid particles can be formed by the hydrolysis of cations. In addition, complex formation with other species (e.g., carbonate) can also result in colloid formation. The sorption properties of such hydroxide, carbonate, etc., colloid particles are different from that of hydrated cations because their size and charge are different. Colloid formation can play a very important role in interfacial processes and the migration of different substances in the geological environment. As a guiding principle, in all studies of interfacial processes of rocks and soils, chemical conditions have to be adjusted so that the chemical species are known and well defined. This is especially important in case of extremely diluted solutions (Chapter 1, Section 1.2.4). [Pg.212]

Figure 10.10 shows typical spectra depicting the spectral change that occurs upon interfacial complex formation of PdLCl. Raman intensities at 1599,1408 and 1303 cm ... [Pg.218]

One more factor, the contact, interaction, and transfer of chemical species on the hquid-frquid interface of two immiscible phases have to be mentioned in the general consideration of chemical kinetics. Little direct information is available on physicochemical properties (interfacial tension, dielectric constant, viscosity, density, charge distribution, etc.) of the interface. The physical depth of the interfacial region can be estimated in the distance in which molecular and ionic forces have their influence. On the aqueous side (monolayers of charged or polar groups) this is several nanometers, on the organic side is the influence of Van der Waals forces. These interfacial zone interactions may slower exchange and complex formation... [Pg.31]


See other pages where Complex formation, interfacial is mentioned: [Pg.266]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.3598]    [Pg.719]    [Pg.1306]    [Pg.1473]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.120]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.234 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.234 ]




SEARCH



Complex formation, interfacial interface

Complex formation, interfacial metals

Interfacial complex

© 2024 chempedia.info