Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison solubility

Immobilized cellulase and amylase are able to hydrolyze cellulose and starch. However, the immobilized enzymes possess only about 1-6% of the activity of the soluble forms. In addition, immobilization clearly enhanced the thermal stability of amylase. Immobilized amylase retained more than half of its activity, even after incubation at 125°C. By comparison, soluble amylase was almost completely inactivated under these conditions. Furthermore, kinetics modeling indicates that the susceptibility to product inhibition is dependent on the amylase source. Finally, immobilization can reduce the susceptibility to product inhibition fQ was less for each of the immobilized forms, compared with their soluble counterparts. [Pg.259]

Marsh s test for arsenic The arsenic-containing specimen is converted to volatile AsHs which is decomposed to a brown stain on heating. Estimation is by comparison of stains. Sb reacts similarly but the Sb stain is not soluble in NaOCl. [Pg.251]

Characteristics of the system as nitrating reagents Wibaut, who introduced the competitive method for determining reactivities (his experiments with toluene, benzene and chlorobenzene were performed under heterogeneous conditions and were not successful), pointed out that solutions of nitric acid in acetic anhydride are useful in making comparisons of reactivities because aromatic compounds are soluble in them. ... [Pg.82]

These methods are now obsolete in comparison with spectroscopic methods. Werbel has shown that the structures of these isomers are easily determined by NMR (125) (see also Table VI-5). Furthermore. 2-imino-4-thiazoline derivatives are characterized by their stretching C=N vibration at 1580 cm , absent in their 2-aminothiazole isomers, and by the stretching NH vibration that appears in the range of 3250 to 3310 cm for the former and between 3250 to 3340 cm" for the latter (131). Ultraviolet spectroscopy also differentiates these isomers (200). They can be separated by boiling in ethanol the thiazoline isomer is usually far less soluble in this solvent (131),... [Pg.38]

The metallic salts of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid can be prepared by reaction of the acid with the corresponding hydroxide or carbonate or by reaction of sulfonyl fluoride with the corresponding hydroxide. The salts are hydroscopic but can be dehydrated at 100°C under vacuum. The sodium salt has a melting point of 248°C and decomposes at 425°C. The lithium salt of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid [33454-82-9] CF SO Li, commonly called lithium triflate, is used as a battery electrolyte in primary lithium batteries because solutions of it exhibit high electrical conductivity, and because of the compound s low toxicity and excellent chemical stabiUty. It melts at 423°C and decomposes at 430°C. It is quite soluble in polar organic solvents and water. Table 2 shows the electrical conductivities of lithium triflate in comparison with other lithium electrolytes which are much more toxic (24). [Pg.315]

Solubility Parameter. CompatibiHty between hydrocarbon resins and other components in an appHcation can be estimated by the Hildebrand solubiHty parameter (2). In order for materials to be mutually soluble, the free energy of mixing must be negative (3). The solubiHty of a hydrocarbon resin with other polymers or components in a system can be approximated by the similarities in the solubiHty parameters of the resin and the other materials. Tme solubiHty parameters are only available for simple compounds and solvents. However, parameters for more complex materials can be approximated by relative solubiHty comparisons with substances of known solubiHty parameter. [Pg.350]

Commercial Hquid sodium alumiaates are normally analyzed for total alumiaa and for sodium oxide by titration with ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid [60-00-4] (EDTA) or hydrochloric acid. Further analysis iacludes the determiaation of soluble alumiaa, soluble siHca, total iasoluble material, sodium oxide content, and carbon dioxide. Aluminum and sodium can also be determiaed by emission spectroscopy. The total iasoluble material is determiaed by weighing the ignited residue after extraction of the soluble material with sodium hydroxide. The sodium oxide content is determiaed ia a flame photometer by comparison to proper standards. Carbon dioxide is usually determiaed by the amount evolved, as ia the Underwood method. [Pg.140]

The concentration of dissolved ionic substances can be roughly estimated by multiplying the specific conductance by an empirical factor of 0.55—0.9, depending on temperature and soluble components. Since specific conductance is temperature dependent, all samples should be measured at the same temperature. Alternatively, an appropriate temperature-correction factor obtained by comparisons with known concentrations of potassium chloride may be used. Instmments are available that automatically correct conductance measurements for different temperatures. [Pg.230]

As already mentioned molecules cohere because of the presence of one or more of four types of forces, namely dispersion, dipole, induction and hydrogen bonding forces. In the case of aliphatic hydrocarbons the dispersion forces predominate. Many polymers and solvents, however, are said to be polar because they contain dipoles and these can enhance the total intermolecular attraction. It is generally considered that for solubility in such cases both the solubility parameter and the degree of polarity should match. This latter quality is usually expressed in terms of partial polarity which expresses the fraction of total forces due to the dipole bonds. Some figures for partial polarities of solvents are given in Table 5.5 but there is a serious lack of quantitative data on polymer partial polarities. At the present time a comparison of polarities has to be made on a commonsense rather than a quantitative approach. [Pg.85]

Technology Description To achieve precipitation, acid or base is added to a solution to adjust the pH to a point where the constituents to be removed have their lowest solubility. Chemical precipitation facilitates the removal of dissolved metals from aqueous wastes. Metals may be precipitated from solutions as hydroxides, sulfides, carbonates, or other soluble salts. A comparison of precipitation reagents is presented in Table 7. Solid separation is effected by standard flocculation/ coagulation techniques. [Pg.145]

The Freundlich liquid phase isotherm can be used to determine the effect of solubility on the adsorptive capacity of activated carbon over a range of different concentrations. Phenol is highly soluble due to its polar nature whilst, in comparison, tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has a low solubility due to being non-polar. In the isotherms illustrated, the concentration of phenol is low relative to its solubility limit and consequently, the adsorptive capacity peaks at 18% maximum (see Figure 9). In comparison the concentration of tetrachloroethylene is relatively close to its solubility limit and, accordingly, the adsorptive capacity is exceptionally good. [Pg.413]

Turpentine Oil.—This is readily recognised in oils which contain no pinene, as this is the main constituent of turpentine oil. It is usually found in the first distillates, and generally reduces the specific gravity and effects the solubility and optical rotation. Its presence is proved by the formation of pinene hydrochloride (melting-point 125°) and the nitro-sochloride (melting-point 103°). If pinene is a constituent of the oil itself, the addition of turpentine can only be proved by comparison with an authentic sample. [Pg.356]

As a matter of fact, the main advantage in comparison with HPLC is the reduction of solvent consumption, which is limited to the organic modifiers, and that will be nonexistent when no modifier is used. Usually, one of the drawbacks of HPLC applied at large scale is that the product must be recovered from dilute solution and the solvent recycled in order to make the process less expensive. In that sense, SFC can be advantageous because it requires fewer manipulations of the sample after the chromatographic process. This facilitates recovery of the products after the separation. Although SFC is usually superior to HPLC with respect to enantioselectivity, efficiency and time of analysis [136], its use is limited to compounds which are soluble in nonpolar solvents (carbon dioxide, CO,). This represents a major drawback, as many of the chemical and pharmaceutical products of interest are relatively polar. [Pg.12]

A comparison of the solubility of a.-olefins with increasing numbers of carbon atoms in water and in [BMIM][BF4] (Figure 5.3-2), shows that olefins are at least 100 times more soluble in the ionic liquid than in water. [Pg.262]

Figure 5.3-2 Comparison of the solubilities of a-olefins with different numbers of carbon... Figure 5.3-2 Comparison of the solubilities of a-olefins with different numbers of carbon...
In comparison with classical processes involving thermal separation, biphasic techniques offer simplified process schemes and no thermal stress for the organometal-lic catalyst. The concept requires that the catalyst and the product phases separate rapidly, to achieve a practical approach to the recovery and recycling of the catalyst. Thanks to their tunable solubility characteristics, ionic liquids have proven to be good candidates for multiphasic techniques. They extend the applications of aqueous biphasic systems to a broader range of organic hydrophobic substrates and water-sensitive catalysts [48-50]. [Pg.278]

In comparison with catalytic reactions in compressed CO2 alone, many transition metal complexes are much more soluble in ionic liquids without the need for special ligands. Moreover, the ionic liquid catalyst phase provides the potential to activate and tune the organometallic catalyst. Furthermore, product separation from the catalyst is now possible without exposure of the catalyst to changes of temperature, pressure, or substrate concentration. [Pg.287]

The Number of Dipoles per Unit Volume. The Entropy Change Accompanying Proton Transfers. The Equilibrium between a Solid and Its Saturated Solution. Examples of Values of L and AF°. The Change of Solubility with Temperature. Uni-divalent and Other Solutes. Lithium Carbonate in Aqueous Solution. H2COj in Aqueous Solution. Comparison between HjCOj and Li2C03 in Aqueous Solution. Heats of Solution and the Conventional Free Energies and Entropies of Solution. [Pg.197]

The molarity of a soluble solute can vary over a wide range. With sodium hydroxide, for example, we can prepare a 6 M solution, a 1M solution, a 0.1 M solution, and so on. The words concentrated and dilute are often used in a qualitative way to describe these solutions. We would describe a 6 M solution of NaOH as concentrated it contains a relatively large amount of solute per liter. A 0.1 M NaOH solution is dilute, at least in comparison to 1M or 6 M. [Pg.75]


See other pages where Comparison solubility is mentioned: [Pg.517]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.929]    [Pg.137]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.271 , Pg.301 , Pg.311 , Pg.320 , Pg.359 , Pg.363 , Pg.430 , Pg.438 , Pg.441 , Pg.448 , Pg.459 , Pg.465 ]




SEARCH



Aqueous solubility, predictive model comparisons

Comparison of solubility

Comparison of the calcite solubility in an open and a closed system

Immobilized enzymes comparison with soluble

Solubility method comparisons

© 2024 chempedia.info