Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Loos-Springer model

The sensor output can be used to test the validity of processing models such as the Loos-Springer model [30]. Sensor measured values of t] can be compared with the Loos-Springer model predictions. Figure 4.14 is a comparison of the model s predictions and the measured values at the sixty-fourth ply. Agreement in the viscosity s time dependence and magnitude with the predictions of models is essential if the model is to be verified and used with confidence. [Pg.150]

Figure 4.14 Comparison of the viscosity at the sixty-fourth ply as predicted by the FDEMS sensor and the Loos-Springer model... Figure 4.14 Comparison of the viscosity at the sixty-fourth ply as predicted by the FDEMS sensor and the Loos-Springer model...
In the past, various resin flow models have been proposed [2,15-19], Two main approaches to predicting resin flow behavior in laminates have been suggested in the literature thus far. In the first case, Kardos et al. [2], Loos and Springer [15], Williams et al. [16], and Gutowski [17] assume that a pressure gradient develops in the laminate both in the vertical and horizontal directions. These approaches describe the resin flow in the laminate in terms of Darcy s Law for flow in porous media, which requires knowledge of the fiber network permeability and resin viscosity. Fiber network permeability is a function of fiber diameter, the porosity or void ratio of the porous medium, and the shape factor of the fibers. Viscosity of the resin is essentially a function of the extent of reaction and temperature. The second major approach is that of Lindt et al. [18] who use lubrication theory approximations to calculate the components of squeezing flow created by compaction of the plies. The first approach predicts consolidation of the plies from the top (bleeder surface) down, but the second assumes a plane of symmetry at the horizontal midplane of the laminate. Experimental evidence thus far [19] seems to support the Darcy s Law approach. [Pg.201]

Probably the first major publication of a process model for the autoclave curing process is one by Springer and Loos [14]. Their model is still the basis, in structure if not in detail, for many autoclave cure models. There is little information about results obtained by the use of this model only instructions on how to use it for trial and error cure cycle development. Lee [16], however, used a very similar model, modified to run on a personal computer, to do a parametric study on variables affecting the autoclave cure. A cure model developed by Pursley was used by Kays in parametric studies for thick graphite epoxy laminates [18]. Quantitative data on the reduction in cure cycle time obtained by Kays was not available, but he did achieve about a 25 percent reduction in cycle time for thick laminates based on historical experience. A model developed by Dave et al. [17] was used to do parametric studies and develop general rules for the prevention of voids in composites. Although the value of this sort of information is difficult to assess, especially without production trials, there is a potential impact on rejection rates. [Pg.455]

Burchard, H., 2002. Applied Turbulence Modelling in Marine Waters. In Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, p.lOO. [Pg.619]


See other pages where Loos-Springer model is mentioned: [Pg.201]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.417]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.150 ]




SEARCH



Springer

Springer model

© 2024 chempedia.info