Combustors emission standards

MSC Facihties are required to meet some of the toughest environmental air emission standards in the country. Complying with these standards makes modern waste combustors among the cleanest producers of electricity—and may even provide a means of improving a community s overall air quality. 

Source U.S. EPA, Fact Sheet—Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards, EPA530-F-05-018, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2005 and U.S. EPA, 40 CFR Parts 9, 63, 260, 264, 265, 266, 270 and 271, National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants Final standards for hazardous air pollutants for hazardous waste combustors, final rule, Federal Register, 70, 196, October 12, 2005. a Standards expressed as mass of pollutant per million Btu contributed by the hazardous waste. 

Emission standards, 21 584-585 diesel engine, 10 60 12 429—430 for new municipal waste combustors,... 

Because of the stringent emissions standards imposed on both mobile and stationary power sources, methods for reducing NO must be found moreover, such methods should not impair the efficiency of the device. The simplest method of reducing NO, particularly from gas turbines, is by adding water to the combustor can. Water vapor can reduce the O radical concentration by the following scavenging reaction ... 

In October 2005, under authority of the Clean Air Act and RCRA, the EPA issued its final national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants from hazardous waste combustors. The standards require hazardous waste combustors to meet hazardous air pollutant emission standards reflecting the application of maximum achievable controllable technology (MACT). These standards are applicable to any hazardous waste incinerator, including the chemical agent disposal facilities. In some states, separate air permits are issued to hazardous waste incinerators, while in others the RCRA permit requirements are adopted or changed to implement the requirements of the new MACT emissions standards for controlling the following pollutants ... 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Steel Pickling—HCI Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Mineral Wool Production National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Hazardous Waste Combustors National Emission Standards for Pharmaceuticals Production... 

Gas cleaning efficiencies of ca. 99.95% have been obtained, with typical filter outlet dust loads of 5-10 mg/Nm LCV gas. These values are acceptable for gas turbine (combustor) operation considering also the sub-micron particle size of solids permeating the filter, see e,g. [14], The values are also well below Dutch emission standards for power producing stations as well as waste incinerators, see e.g. Bergsma et al. [15]. 

Pollutants From Hazardous Waste Combustors Subpart GGG National Emission Standards for Pharmaceuticals... 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Final Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste Combustors, Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 196, October 12, 2005. 

US-EPA (2002) Economic impact analysis (ElA) Small municipal waste combustors-emissions guidelines and new source performance. Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards, EP 4.52 EC 7/10,p 715... 

Emissions from hazardous waste combustors are regulated under two statutory authorities RCRA and the CAA. The MACT standards set emission limitations for dioxins, furans, metals, particulate matter, total chlorine, hydrocarbons/carbon monoxide, and destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) for organics. Once a facility has demonstrated compliance with the MACT standards by conducting its comprehensive performance test (CPT) and submitting its notification of compliance (NOC), it is no longer subject to the RCRA emission requirements with a few exceptions. RCRA-permitted facilities, however, must continue to comply with their permitted emissions requirements until they obtain modifications to remove any duplicative emissions conditions from their RCRA... 

The combustors affected by this rule detoxify or recover energy from hazardous waste and include incinerators, cement kilns, lightweight aggregate kilns, boilers and process heaters, and hydrochloric acid production furnaces. U.S. EPA estimates that 145 facilities operate 265 devices that burn hazardous waste. These technology-based standards reduce emissions of hazardous pollutants, including lead, mercury, arsenic, dioxin and furans, and HC1 and chlorine gas. In addition, emissions of PM are also reduced. 

Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources Emission guidelines an compliance times for municipal waste combustors Yes 40 CFR 60, Subpart Cb EPA 1995b... 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995). Fact Sheet, Existing Municipal Waste Combustors—Subpart Cb Emissions Guidelines (1995). Washington, D.C., November Fact Sheet, New Municipal Waste Combustors—Subpart Eb Standards of Performance (1995). Washington, D.C., November,... 

Particulate emissions ranged from 9 mg per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dsm ) of the flue gas volume (corrected to 12% CO2) for wood offcuts to 191 mg/dsm for SRF E. nitens. Following the lowest value of 9 mg/dsm coal combustion produced the second lowest particulate emission of 40 mg/dsm This variation was associated with the density of the fuels being fired, and the overall proportion of fmes in the feedstock as fed into the combustor. However, wood offcuts with sawdust was an exception for its relatively low density and high proportion of fine particles. 

Under normal operating conditions, in which the combustor is sufficiently warm and operated under fuel rich conditions, virtually no NOx is formed, although the formation of ammonia is possible. Most hydrocarbons are converted to carbon dioxide (or methane if the reaction is incomplete) however, trace levels of hydrocarbons can pass through the fuel processor and fuel cell. The shift reactors and the preferential oxidation (PrOx) reactor reduce CO in the product gas, with further reduction in the fuel cell. Thus, of the criteria pollutants (NOx, CO, and non-methane hydrocarbons [NMHC]), NOx CO levels are generally well below the most aggressive standards. NMOG concentrations, however, can exceed emission goals if these are not efficiently eliminated in the catalytic burner. 

---