Combined Compressive and Bending Stress

In the case of masonry panels undergoing stresses over the panel plane, resistance to combined compressive and bending stress over the panel plane can be enhanced by vertically and synunetrically laying np reinforcanents with composite materials over the two faces of the masonry panel and by anchoring them to the end sections of the panel. 

---

In order to evaluate the design flexural resistance of the FRP-strengthened member as well, in the presence of an axial force (combined compressive and bending stress), the principles introduced in the previous chapters are valid, as long as the dependence of the design flexural capacity Mr, of the strengthened member on the normal factored axial force, Nsi, is taken into account. 

Verification of combined compressive and bending stress over the plane... 

The Euler s formula developed by Leonard Euler (Swiss mathematician, 1707 to 1783) is used in product designs and also in designs using columns in molds and dies that process plastic. Euler s formula assumes that the failure of a column is due solely to the stresses induced by sidewise bending. This assumption is not true for short columns that fidl mainly by direct compression, nor is it true for columns of medium length. The failure in such cases is by a combination of direct compression and bending. 

The first main feature of the System 4 RMS is its ability to characterize a wider range of the above systems than any other current rheometer. Several drives and stress transducers are required the wide range of modes, rates and materials to be handled would mean that no single drive/transducer combination would be sufficiently flexible and accurate. Instead, the System 4 RMS uses a turret with four different drive or transducer units one unit is used for steady shear tests, one for oscillatory shear, one for tension-compression and bending and one unit is used for low-viscosity-high-shear-rate tests on fluids. The second main feature of the new machine is its completely automatic microprocessor control coupled with data acquisition and reduction. Without doubt, this new rheometer will result in rheo-metrical tests being carried out more reliably, accurately and quickly than previously. 

The determination of the bending strength combines the compressive and tensile stresses, which probably gives a more advanced picture of the material s properties. 

Bending strength, flexural strength, modulus of rupture, MOR gives the combination of compressive and tensile stresses of materials. A simple and convenient method of estimating the mechanical strength of refractories. 

When the experimentalist set an ambitious objective to evaluate micromechanical properties quantitatively, he will predictably encounter a few fundamental problems. At first, the continuum description which is usually used in contact mechanics might be not applicable for contact areas as small as 1 -10 nm [116,117]. Secondly, since most of the polymers demonstrate a combination of elastic and viscous behaviour, an appropriate model is required to derive the contact area and the stress field upon indentation a viscoelastic and adhesive sample [116,120]. In this case, the duration of the contact and the scanning rate are not unimportant parameters. Moreover, bending of the cantilever results in a complicated motion of the tip including compression, shear and friction effects [131,132]. Third, plastic or inelastic deformation has to be taken into account in data interpretation. Concerning experimental conditions, the most important is to perform a set of calibrations procedures which includes the (x,y,z) calibration of the piezoelectric transducers, the determination of the spring constants of the cantilever, and the evaluation of the tip shape. The experimentalist has to eliminate surface contamination s and be certain about the chemical composition of the tip and the sample. 

The bending stress induced by the cantilever beam action is zero at the top of the tower and a maximum at the base. The bending stress produces a compressive axial stress on the downwind side of the column and a corresponding tensile stress on the upwind side. Thus, regardless of whether a taU vertical tower is operated under vacuum or under internal pressure, there will be an increase of the axial stresses on one side and a subtraction on the opposite side. When this combination of axial stresses equals or exceeds the combined circumferential stress, the axial stresses, rather than the circumferential stresses, will control the thickness requirement of the shell. 

Seismic forces have effects somewhat similar to wind loads in that the vertical tower is loaded as a cantilever beam standing on end and fixed at the base. There is a difference in the distribution of wind loads compared to seismic loads, but in both instances the vertical column is exposed to bending which produces axial tensile stresses on one side and axial compressive stresses on the other side. These must be combined with the axial stresses from the operating pressures for both vacuum and pressure operation. 

The stiffener and the effective width of box-section plate were considered a column or longitudinal strut supported between transverse T-stiffeners. The stiffened sections resulted in slenderness ratios (KLIr) of less than 115. The compressive resistance of the effective stiffener and plate section was compared to the computed axial stress due to the combined effects of bending md cixicil load. 

This section applies only to those compression members for which the load is applied coincident with the centroid of the member. If the load application is eccentric, then bending stresses as well as axial stresses occur. The effect of combined bending and axial compression is considered elsewhere. 

In this section a short description is given of how the elements and specimens made of composite materials behave under compression, tension, bending, shear and combined states of stress. Because a large number of different test results are available in published papers and books, it is not intended to summarize all of them here, but rather to show characteristic behaviour under static short-term loading, and to explain the role of reinforcement, leaving the reader to follow particular aspects from the recent test reports. 

The applicalirm of Eq, 4.22 is" limited tp conditions in which I exceeds 156 but is less than 406. If the member is shorter than 156. the rafter may lie designed as a beam. Lateral stiffeners may Iw list d to maintain / within the upper limit of 406. The value of 20,000 specified in the mimerator of Eq. 4.22 is fM rmitted because tl bending stress is niaxinumi only at the outer fiber, and tlw refore tte maxiniiHn combined compressive stress exists only at the outermost filler on the top side of the rafter. The avera compressive stiess acit the member will be less than 20,000 psi. 

Gere, J. M. 2004. Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed. London Brooks/Cole. Describes the fundamentals of mechanics of materials. Principal topics are analysis and design of structural members subjected to tension, compression, torsion, and bending as well as stress, strain, elastic behavior, inelastic behavior, and strain energy. Transformations of stress and strain, combined loadings, stress concentrations, deflections of beams, and stability of columns are also covered. Includes many problem sets with answers in the back. 

---