Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Colloidal systems particle size distribution

The major disadvantages of colloidal catalysts studied so far can be attributed to problems in controlling the metal colloid formation (control of particle size, particle size distribution, structure of metal colloids) and stabilization of the prepared particles, which are not yet completely solved. But it is exactly the stability of the nanoparticles, that is decisive for long-term usage during catalytic processes. Moreover for catalytic application, it is extremely important to preserve the large surface of such colloidal systems. [Pg.283]

A number of environmental applications [3] have been performed in order to size characterize colloids collected in rivers (riverbome particles, SPM, and sediments), clay samples and ground limestone (from soils), coal particles, diesel soot particles (from combustion processes), or airborne particles in urban areas (from waste incinerators, vehicles, household-heating systems, and manufacturing). In many of these cases, not only the size but also the particle size distribution was important and thus, in conjunction with the traditional UV detector, specific detectors such as ETAAS, ICP-MS, ICP-AES were used [40] in order to obtain more detailed, more specific compositional information. [Pg.353]

This chapter summarizes the present state of the art of the forced hydrolysis approach by considering specific cations, particularly those of greatest practical and theoretical interest, using aqueous solutions of common salts. In addition to being economical in the manufacture of different products, the described procedure can also help in the development of a better understanding of different processes, such as corrosion of metals or formation of minerals, to mention a few. It should be emphasized that the focus of this chapter is on dispersions of narrow particle size distributions, normally designated as monodispersed systems. While a number of genera reviews have been published on monodispersed colloids (7,9-21), this chapter specifically addresses the problems related to metal (hydrous) oxides. [Pg.4]

Another colloidal system with light scattering characteristics that have been widely studied is the so-called monodisperse sulfur sol. Although not actually monodisperse, the particle size distribution in this preparation is narrow enough to make it an ideal system for the study of optical phenomena. [Pg.235]

Colloidal systems are generally of a polydispersed nature - i.e. the molecules or particles in a particular sample vary in size. By virtue of their stepwise build-up, colloidal particle and polymer molecular sizes tend to have skew distributions, as illustrated in Figure 1.2, for which the Poisson distribution often offers a good approximation. Very often, detailed determination of relative molecular mass or particle size distribution is impracticable and less perfect experimental methods, which yield average values, must be accepted. The significance of the word average depends on the relative contributions of the various molecules or particles to the property of the system which is being measured. [Pg.9]

For colloidal semiconductor systems, Albery et al. observed good agreement between the value of the radial dispersion obtained from dynamic light scattering and the value found from application of the above kinetic analysis to flash photolysis experiments [144], It should be remembered that this disperse kinetics model can only be applied to the decay of heterogeneous species under unimolecular or pseudo-first order conditions and that for colloidal semiconductors it may only be applied to dispersions whose particle radii conform to equation (37), i.e., a log normal distribution. However, other authors [145] have recently refined the model so that assumptions about the particle size distribution may be avoided in the kinetic data analysis. [Pg.311]

Batch suspension reactors are, theoretically, the kinetic equivalent of water-cooled mass reactors. The major new problems are stabilization of the viscous polymer drops, prediction of particle size distribution, etc. Particle size distribution was found to be determined early in the polymerization by Hopff et al. (28, 29,40). Church and Shinnar (12) applied turbulence theory to explain the stabilization of suspension polymers by the combined action of protective colloids and turbulent flow forces. Suspension polymerization in a CSTR without coalescence is a prime example of the segregated CSTR treated by Tadmor and Biesenberger (51) and is discussed below. In a series of papers, Goldsmith and Amundson (23) and Luss and Amundson (39) studied the unique control and stability problems which arise from the existence of the two-phase reaction system. [Pg.23]

Two main techniques have been used to determine the particle size distribution of colloidal systems PCS and electron microscopy including both SEM and TEM. The QELS technique for Brownian moment measurement, offers an accurate procedure for measuring the size distribution of nanoparticles. The PCS technique does not require any particular preparation for analysis and is excellent due to its efficiency and accuracy. However, its dependency on the Brownian movement of particles in a suspended medium may affect the particle size determination. [Pg.54]

An analytical ultra-centrifugation technique has been used in combination with a scanning optical absorption system for particle size distribution determination. The system was demonstrated for colloidal plulimim 0.4 to 2) nm and unstabilized zinc (4-9) nrn during particle growth [82], A review of examples of colloid analysis of nanosize particles by ultracentrifugation with a focus on multicomonent mixtures has been published.[83]... [Pg.442]

Parkinson, C., Matsumoto, S., and Sherman, P. 1970. The influence of particle-size distribution on the apparent viscosity of non-Newtonian dispersed system, y. Colloid Interface Sci. 33 150-160. [Pg.57]

Colloid Mill Colloid mills are rotor-stator systems that can be used to reduce the particle size distribution of both liquid dispersions (emulsions) and solid dispersions (suspensions). The emulsion or suspension is pumped through a narrow gap that is formed by the rotating inner cone and the stationary outer cone. The width of the annulus can be adjusted by changing the relative position of the two cones. The principal size reduction in colloid mills is due to the high shear forces that are caused by the velocity difference between the rotor and the stator surfaces. To increase wall friction and reduce slip, surfaces are usually not smooth but are roughened or toothed, which, in turn, changes the flow conditions from laminar to turbulent, thereby increasing the shear forces in the annulus. [Pg.1833]

Fiiedlander (1960), Hunt (1980), Filella and Buffle (1993), and others have analyzed the effect of colloid agglomeration by coagulation and particle removal by settling on the shape of the particle size distribution function as expressed by equation 4. The predictions of model calculations are often consistent with the range of values of /3 observed in aquatic systems. [Pg.829]

Figure 14.4a illustrates a simulation model by Filella and Buffle (1993) on the temporal evolution of a colloid system characterized initially by a continuous particle size distribution with = 4 and a size range from 1 nm to 100 /xm. [Pg.829]

Polydispersity arises in systems composed of particles characterized by a property (e.g., particle diameter) that spans a continuum of values. Small molecules exhibit discrete properties, so they do not form polydisperse mixtures. Only at the level of macromolecules and colloidal aggregates does polydispersity become an issue. Here variations in particle size are known to influence the ordering into a solid phase. Experimentally it has been observed that colloidal systems will not form a solid phase if the size polydispersity (as measured by the standard deviation of the particle-size distribution) is greater than about 5% to 10% of the average diameter [252]. [Pg.165]

Figure 4. Flow FFF (system Flow I) characterization of three different Ludox colloidal silica suspensions a, fractograms and b, particle size distributions. Figure 4. Flow FFF (system Flow I) characterization of three different Ludox colloidal silica suspensions a, fractograms and b, particle size distributions.

See other pages where Colloidal systems particle size distribution is mentioned: [Pg.2900]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.273]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.202 , Pg.208 ]




SEARCH



Colloid particle

Colloid size distribution

Colloidal particle system

Colloidal systems

Colloids particle size

Distribution system

Particle Sizing Systems

Particle distribution

Particle size distribution

Particle size distribution polydisperse colloidal system

Particle sizing distribution

Particle systems

System size

© 2024 chempedia.info