Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Collaboration stakeholders

Table 1 presents key steps in developing continuous quality improvement activities in school mental health. We emphasize that implementation of a cqi program is a process that takes time, money, and effort from all who are involved in the program, including its leaders, staff, collaborating stakeholders, advisory board members, and funders. [Pg.279]

Form collaboratives and define roles among key market participants and stakeholders to lead and manage the market transtormation initiative. [Pg.760]

The development process starts with a thorough planning step in which a development plan is generated by the collaboration of all stakeholders, such as quality assurance (QA), QC sourcing sites, stability, development, and regulatory functions. Planning should also include information gathering to obtain ... [Pg.168]

FIGURE I Schematic overview of an advanced method development process. Method development is a continuous process in which all stakeholders collaborate intensively to design the final method. Reprinted with permission from reference I. [Pg.65]

These principles of collaboration are especially important in studies involving pediatric psychopharmacology, in part because the misunderstanding of pediatric mental illnesses and the concerns about medications, have created a climate of distrust and confusion. Direct and open communication between stakeholders and researchers is necessary to accomplish the goals of creating an ethical and valid scientific base. [Pg.743]

However the effects are often neither significant nor important agronomically (Ryan and Ash 1999, see also Chapter 2). Like collaborative research into sheep parasites, there are many stakeholders interested in improving soil P availability. [Pg.432]

Here again the public actor has a central responsibility, but dialogue and collaboration with the private stakeholders is necessary. Conflicts in the appreciation of risks will be unavoidable. The assessments will describe prospective problems, for which few antecedents exist, and therefore with scarce statistical data for supporting the estimation of the probabilities and potential effects of the risk events. [Pg.68]

The paper introduced the concept of trust case and explained how it can be used to justify trustworthiness of IT systems or services. It discussed where the evidence supporting trust comes from and the role of ontologies in decomposing trust objectives. Then the concept of trust case stakeholder was introduced and the need for collaborative trust case development was emphasized. Finally, the present tool supporting the development of trust cases was briefly characterized. [Pg.140]

The importance of the concept of trust case stakeholder and collaborative development of a trust cases became evident while applying our approach to complex e-Health applications. It seems to be even more important if we consider IT infrastructures supporting for instance electricity distribution where we face the problem of distributed responsibility and ownership of the system. [Pg.140]

In line with the objectives of the CCQM Workshop, we have tried to suggest how measurement traceability can be disseminated to field laboratories. An important anticipated evolution in this respect is the fact that the stakeholders dealing with accreditation/metrology/edu-cation/standardization will need to collaborate much more closely to achieve measurable progress. [Pg.168]

PROHYTEC aims at being an area where academic discussions and industrial interests could meet by promoting collaborative projects with international stakeholders. Thus PROHYTEC is a real opportunity to participate in the emergence of an energy industry which will preserve the environment and the climate. [Pg.332]

During the development of REACH the EU Commission held extensive dialog with stakeholders before and after the proposal was presented. Stakeholders sent over 6000 responses during the REACH Internet consultation and contributed to the REACH Impact Assessment both before and after the launch of the Commission REACH proposal in 2003,75 One of the purposes of the collaboration was to help the EU Commission improve the design and cost effectiveness of the system. [Pg.682]

To this end, Europe could propose to create a mechanism of collaboration with Asia, perhaps by creating a website to share all best practices and all possible updated information on chemicals management in Europe. They should also ensure that Asian stakeholders know that financial support can be available under EU funding programmes to deal with chemicals management issues. [Pg.25]

Policymakers and stakeholders in both Europe and Asia should try to develop potential collaboration on common achievements to promote a more comprehensive risk-based chemicals management and an appropriate common definition of producer responsibility for chemicals. A core group of Asian countries could take on this job together with the EU. [Pg.25]

With the increasing complexity of the food chain and increasing safety requirements the importance of this collaboration between all stakeholders becomes more and more evident. Recent food scares unfortunately underline the need for more cooperation. [Pg.54]

Background. Once indicators are selected, baseline practice data must be measured in order to determine current practices. This step is important to objectively denote the current practice, make sure all major stakeholders are involved in the improvement process, and set the stage for problem solving. CQI should be data driven, so that measurement of current practice by collaboratively developing quality indicators clearly defines the extent of the problem. It is important to measure the baseline data at several time... [Pg.214]

The valne of a collaborative effort in the AEGL program is related primarily to the pooling of substantial resources of the various stakeholders and the direct or indirect involvement of a significant portion of the relevant scientific commnnity from both the public and private sectors. These factors, in tnm, promote greater productivity, efficiency, and cost effectiveness of such an effort and greatly enhance the scientific credibility of the AEGLs that are developed by the committee. [Pg.53]


See other pages where Collaboration stakeholders is mentioned: [Pg.760]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.959]   


SEARCH



Collaborative innovation stakeholders

Stakeholder/system collaboration

Stakeholders

States system/stakeholder collaboration

© 2024 chempedia.info