Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cleared forest

Cleared forest, igneous catchment 1 Dillon and Kirchmer,... [Pg.30]

Simpson, A.J., Watt, B.E., Graham, C.L. and Hayes, M.H.B. (1997) Humic substances from podzols under oak forest and a cleared forest site I. Isolation and characterization. In Hayes, M.H.B. and Wilson, W.S. (eds) Flumic Substances in Soils, Peats and Waters. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp. 73-82. [Pg.218]

Ayya Tathaaloka Bhikkhuni. (2010). Saffron and green in the clear forest pool A reflection on the four noble truths and right effort. In D. W. Mitchell W. Skudlarek, OSB (Eds.), Green monasticism A Buddhist-Catholic response to an environmental calamity (pp. 111-124). Brooklyn Lantern Books. [Pg.108]

Less mechanization is used on smaller tracts of individually owned land, where the terrain is mountainous or otherwise difficult to reach, or where thinning as opposed to clear-cutting is the preferred silvicultural practice. The harvesting operation maybe done by the landowner or small contractor using chainsaws and tractors. In some operations where minimal damage to the forest is critical, horses may be used. Sale of pulpwood to the mill operation is usually through dealers. [Pg.255]

Forest fire Fire cannot propagate to the site because the site is cleared plant design and fire-protection provisions a adequate to mitigate the effects Seiche Included under external flooding... [Pg.186]

Over the course of human history rivers have reflected the impact of human activity. Since the beginnings of the great civilizations 5000 years ago, humankind, in its pursuit of agriculture, exploration and conquest, has exploited and mistreated the environment on a broad scale. Major changes on the face of the earth occurred. Forests were cut, pastures grazed, fields cleared and plowed "... as the landscape was carved to fit the new economic demands of humankind." (7). Such changes have been well documented (2-5). [Pg.241]

Another model, first introduced by Moore, et al. (2i), was used to examine the role of terrestrial vegetation and the global carbon cycle, but did not include an ocean component. This model depended on estimates of carbon pool size and rates of CO2 uptake and release. This model has been used to project the effect of forest clearing and land-use change on the global carbon cycle (22, 23, 24). [Pg.418]

Several studies, based on models, examined the effects of land-use change on the global carbon cycle and conclude that there is a net release of carbon due to land clearing. However, the results and conclusions of these studies are based on assumed sizes of vegetation carbon pools which are inputs to the models. For example, Melillo et al. 24) concluded that boreal and temperate deciduous forests of the northern hemisphere are net sources of atmospheric carbon. Their analysis used values for carbon density derived by Whittaker and Likens 19) from work by Rodin and Bazilevich (27). Rodin and Bazilevich extrapolated results of small, unrelated studies in Europe and the USSR to estimate total biomass of Eurasian boreal and temperate deciduous forests. Their estimates have since been extrapolated to forests worldwide and are used often today. [Pg.419]

Land use changes in the tropics have resulted in a landscape characterized as a mosaic of logged forests, cleared fields, and successional forests. This results in the transformation from extremely fire resistant rainforest ecosystems to anthropogenic landscapes in which fire is a common event (16, 17), Fires occur in disturbed tropical forests because deforestation has a dramatic effect on microclimate. Deforestation results in lower relative humidities, increased wind speeds, and increased air temperatures. In addition, deforestation results in increased quantities of biomass that are susceptible to fire. This biomass may be in the form of forest slash, leaf litter, grasses, lianas or herbaceous species (16, 18). [Pg.427]

Similar results were reported in deforested Amazonian rainforests (66). Within three years following forest clearing and burning, nutrient concentrations of soil leachates had returned to levels typical of primary forests of the area. A combination of high rates of immobilization and storage by successional vegetation, coupled with a decline in easily decomposable substrates, was attributed to the reduction in leaching losses. [Pg.443]

The fate of areas of south-eastern American deciduous forests which were dominated, before the arrival of the pathogen, by chestnut and species of oak has been traced (Fig. 10) over nearly 40 years (Day Monk, 1974). The demise of chestnut from its standing as a canopy dominant was rapid, taking about 20 years, with a complete failure to return. During this period eeosystem productivity was reduced (as shown by a reduction in tree basal area. Fig. 10). However, the place of chestnut in the forest has been taken by a number of species, in particular oak and tulip tree, which have steadily increased in dominance. The community has clearly changed markedly but the ecosystem as a whole has shown complete recovery, in terms of re-establishing tree basal area. The place of chestnut in the oak-chestnut forests has been taken by other native species. So in the context of conservation, although the loss of chestnut is unfortunate, it has not been at the eost of an invasion of alien species of tree. [Pg.23]

These scales of extent define the manner in which the ideas of extreme events are applicable to agriculture and forestry. Wind-throw is a small-scale process and the forest manager must grow and manage plantation forests which will survive extreme wind speeds at the spatial scale of his plantation. The question is, how rare must this extreme event be, before it may be discounted. The answer is likely to be dominated by economics and also the longevity of the plants with a 50 year harvesting interval, it seems clear that the return periods of extreme events up to 50 years (at least) are crucial. [Pg.27]

Garcia E, Carignan R. 1999. Impact of wildfire and clear-cutting in the boreal forest on methyhnercury in zooplankton. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56 339-345. [Pg.115]


See other pages where Cleared forest is mentioned: [Pg.30]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1371]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1371]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.278]   


SEARCH



Clear

Clearness

Forest clear-cutting

Forest clearing

Forest clearing

© 2024 chempedia.info