Chromium removal treatment

The sodium chlorate manufacturing process can be divided into six steps (/) brine treatment 2 electrolysis (J) crystallisation and salt recovery (4) chromium removal (5) hydrogen purification and collection and (6) electrical distribution. These steps are outlined in Figure 3. 

Other aquatic weeds such as reed mat, mangrove (leaves), and water lily (Nymphaceae family plants) have been found to be promising biosorbents for chromium removal. The highest Cr(III) adsorption capacity was exhibited by reed mat (7.18 mg/g), whereas for Cr(VI), mangrove leaves showed maximum removal capacity (8.87 mg/g) followed by water lily (8.44 mg/g). It is interesting to mention that Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III), with the help of tannin, phenolic compounds, and other functional groups on the biosorbent, and subsequently adsorbed. Unlike the results discussed previously for the use of acidic treatments, in this case, such treatments significantly increased the Cr(VI) removal capacity of the biosorbents, whereas the alkali treatment reduced it.118... 

SchiffI H, Weidmann P, Weiss M, et al. Dialysis treatment of acute chromium intoxication and comparativeefficacy of peritoneal versus hemodialysis In chromium removal. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1982 7 28-35... 

Ostertag s committee painted the picture of water pollution in shades quite different from those Dickey had used. Industrial wastes received equal billing with sewage. While the committee repeated the usual platitudes about industry s desire to reduce pollution, the facts it compiled made clear that real progress was slow. Numerous sites of industrial pollution were mapped, with chemical plants in Buffalo seen as a particular problem. Aside from the Long Island chromium removal systems, only three major industrial treatment facilities were built anywhere in the state in 1948. The total construction cost of needed industrial waste treatment... 

In removing excess free chlorine from municipal or industrial water and from wastewater, sodium sulfite competes with bisulfite or sulfur dioxide. Other commercial appHcations of sodium sulfite in wastewater treatment include the reduction of hexavalent chromium to the less toxic Cr " salts as well as the precipitation of silver and mercury. 

For metal compounds, the calculation of the reportable concentration and treatment efficiency is based on the weight ot the parent metal, not on the weight of the metal compounds Metals are not destroyed, only physically removed or chemically converted from one form into another. The treatment efficiency reported represents only physical removal of the parent metal from the wastestream, not the percent chemical conversion of the metal compound. If a listed treatment method converts but does not remove a metal (e.g., chromium reduction), the method must be reported, but the treatment efficiency must be reported as zero. 

Precipitation is often applied to the removal of most metals from wastewater including zinc, cadmium, chromium, copper, fluoride, lead, manganese, and mercury. Also, certain anionic species can be removed by precipitation, such as phosphate, sulfate, and fluoride. Note that in some cases, organic compounds may form organometallic complexes with metals, which could inhibit precipitation. Cyanide and other ions in the wastewater may also complex with metals, making treatment by precipitation less efficient. A cutaway view of a rapid sand filter that is most often used in a municipal treatment plant is illustrated in Figure 4. The design features of this filter have been relied upon for more than 60 years in municipal applications. 

Austenitic steels of the 304S15 type are normally heat treated at 1 050°C and cooled at a fairly rapid rate to remove the effects of cold or hot working, and in this state much of the carbon is in supersaturated solid solution. Reheating to temperatures below the solution treatment temperature leads to the formation of chromium-rich MjjCj precipitates predominantly at the grain boundaries with the production of chromium gradients and reduced corrosion resistance as is the case with the martensitic steels. Any attack is... 

The cobalt complex is usually formed in a hot acetate-acetic acid medium. After the formation of the cobalt colour, hydrochloric acid or nitric acid is added to decompose the complexes of most of the other heavy metals present. Iron, copper, cerium(IV), chromium(III and VI), nickel, vanadyl vanadium, and copper interfere when present in appreciable quantities. Excess of the reagent minimises the interference of iron(II) iron(III) can be removed by diethyl ether extraction from a hydrochloric acid solution. Most of the interferences can be eliminated by treatment with potassium bromate, followed by the addition of an alkali fluoride. Cobalt may also be isolated by dithizone extraction from a basic medium after copper has been removed (if necessary) from acidic solution. An alumina column may also be used to adsorb the cobalt nitroso-R-chelate anion in the presence of perchloric acid, the other elements are eluted with warm 1M nitric acid, and finally the cobalt complex with 1M sulphuric acid, and the absorbance measured at 500 nm. 

The chiral bimetallic complex 1653 reacts with TMSOTf 20 in the presence of excess styrene, via 1654, to give the cyclopropane complex 1655 in high yield [38]. The chromium can be readily removed from 1655 by treatment with I2 in Et20. Analogously, the complex 1656 reacts with styrene in 90% yield, via 1657, to give MegSiOH 4 and phenylcyclopropane 1658 [39] (Scheme 10.17). 

The ideal disposal method is a chemical treatment that can convert hazardous waste into environmentally benign materials. For example, trichloroethylene (CI2 C I CHCl) is highly toxic to aquatic life, but this compound can be made nontoxic by chemical treatment that converts its chlorine atoms into chloride anions. Similarly, the chromium-containing waste from electroplating operations contains highly toxic CrOq anions, but a chemical treatment that converts CrOq into Cr causes the chromium to precipitate from the solution as insoluble Cr (OH). This removal of chromium detoxifies the water. 

It should be noted that dissolved air flotation (DAF) is a more effective process for clarification.8-10 As shown in Appendix D, with an additional step of chromium reduction, the secondary treatment system effectively removed chromium (over 99%), copper (89%), cadmium (64%), lead (67%), and zinc (77%). 

---