Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chemists force

A drawback of this approach is that it typically generates enormous and imwieldy synthesis trees which contain a large number of dead-end branches which are not worth further consideration. Furthermore, the chemist is forced to follow a rigid scheme during the planning process, alternating between the application of transforms, the derivation of new precursors, and again the application of further transforms to these precursors. [Pg.577]

The nucleus of an atom is made up of protons and neutrons in a cluster. Virtually all the mass of the atom resides in the nucleus. The nucleus is held together by the tight pull of what is known to chemists and physicists as the "strong force." This force between the protons and neutrons overcomes the repulsive electrical force that would, according to the rules of electricity, push the protons apart otherwise. [Pg.222]

Now, contrary to popular opinions, this method need not be conducted in a sealed pipe bomb. Secondary amination by substitution is as much a reaction of opportunity as it is of brute force and heat. In fact, heating can tend to cause the reformation of safrole and isosafrole. So the simplest way to do this would be to use 500mL of ammonium hydroxide or alcoholic ammonia or, for those wishing to make MDMA or meth, 40% aqueous methylamine or alcoholic methylamine (to tell you the truth, methylamine is preferable in this method because it is more reactive that ammonia so yield will increase). This 500mL is placed in a flask and into it is poured a solution of 35g bromosafrole (30g phenylisopropyl-bromide) mixed with 50mL methanol. The flask is stoppered and stirred at room temperature for anywhere from 3 to 7 days. The chemist could also reflux the same mixture for 6-12 hours or she could throw the whole mix into a sealed pipe bomb (see How to Make section) and cook it for 5 hours in a 120-130°C oil bath. [Pg.157]

During the early years of this century, organic chemists were enjoying success in determining the structures of ordinary-sized organic molecules, and this probably contributed to their reluctance to look beyond structures of convenient size. Physical chemists were interested in intermolecular forces at this period, and the idea that polymers were the result of some sort of association between low molecular weight constituent molecules prevailed fora long while. [Pg.2]

Whereas the general office community reaped the benefits (and endured the pain) of the rise of the personal computer, the scientific and technical market was forced to wait. Chemists used spreadsheets and suffered through word processors that did not know what a chemical stmcture was. However, there is now a good variety of personal productivity tools that have been designed specifically for the chemist. [Pg.87]

Started to rise from the reaction, causing the vessel bottom head to fail at the weld seam. The force from the escaping gases propelled the tank into the ceiling and overhead structural steel. A small fire erupted which was quickly brought under control by the automatic sprinkler system. Even though the chemists had reviewed the chemistry and did not anticipate any problems, use testing could have identified this problem in the laboratory rather than the plant. [Pg.9]

Sq can be calculated from the theoretically derived U(r) curves of the sort described in Chapter 4. This is the realm of the solid-state physicist and quantum chemist, but we shall consider one example the ionic bond, for which U(r) is given in eqn. (4.3). Differentiating once with respect to r gives the force between the atoms, which must, of course, be zero at r = rg (because the material would not otherwise be in equilibrium, but would move). This gives the value of the constant B in equation (4.3) ... [Pg.59]

Leaving aside rayon and artificial silks generally, the first really effective polymeric textile fibre was nylon, discovered by the chemist Wallace Hume Carothers (1896-1937) in the Du Pont research laboratories in America in 1935, and first put into production in 1940, just in time to make parachutes for the wartime forces. This was the first of several major commodity polymer fibres and, together with high-density polyethylene introduced about the same time and Terylene , polyethylene tereph-thalate, introduced in 1941 (the American version is Dacron), transformed the place of polymers in the materials pantheon. [Pg.321]

Chemists often call upon certain chemical types of interaction to account for solvent-solvent, solvent-solute, or solute-solute interaction behavior, and we should eon-sider how these ehemical interactions are related to the long-range noncovalent forces discussed above. The important chemical interactions are charge transfer, hydrogen bonding, and the hydrophobic interaction. [Pg.394]

By the mid-1800s, the new science of chemistry was developing rapidly and chemists had begun to probe the forces holding compounds together. In 1858, August Kekule and Archibald Couper independently proposed that, in all its compounds, carbon is tetravalent—it always forms four bonds when it joins other elements to form stable compounds. Furthermore, said Kekule, carbon atoms can bond to one another to form extended chains of linked atoms. [Pg.7]

When thinking about chemical reactivity, chemists usually focus their attention on bonds, the covalent interactions between atoms within individual molecules. Also important, hotvever, particularly in large biomolecules like proteins and nucleic acids, are a variety of interactions between molecules that strongly affect molecular properties. Collectively called either intermolecular forces, van der Waals forces, or noncovalent interactions, they are of several different types dipole-dipole forces, dispersion forces, and hydrogen bonds. [Pg.61]

Halobenzenes without electron-withdrawing substituents don t react with nucleophiles under most conditions. At high temperature and pressure, however, even chlorobenzene can be forced to react. Chemists at the Dow Chemical Company discovered in 1928 that phenol could be prepared on a large industrial scale by treatment of chlorobenzene with dilute aqueous NaOH at 34U °C under 170 atm pressure. [Pg.575]


See other pages where Chemists force is mentioned: [Pg.14]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.989]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.69]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 , Pg.207 , Pg.208 , Pg.209 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info