Chemistry process safety practices

Listed below are safety practices aimed at minimizing the incidents caused by process chemistry issues. 

Association (ABMA), recommendations for boiler-water limits, 23 221t American Chemical Society Committee on Nomenclature and Notation, 17 385 American Chemistry Council (ACC) 14 204 codes of management practices, 21 580 Process Safety Code, 21 831 Responsible Care initiatives, 25 337 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH),... 

The nine surveyed companies volunteered to participate. Industry trade associations (American Chemistry Council [ACC], National Association of Chemical Distributors [NACD], Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association [SOCMA]) and professional societies (Center for Chemical Process Safety [CCPS]) were asked to identify possible survey candidates-small, medium, and large sites or companies with reactive chemical hazard management programs or practices in place. As such, the survey was not intended to represent the practices of the chemical industry as a whole in fact, the survey... 

Multiple layers of protection are a concept incorporated in the American Chemistry Council Process Safety Code of Management Practices. ) Management Practice number 15 endorses sufficient layers of protection through technology, facilities, and personnel to prevent escalation from a single failure to a catastrophic occurrence. This approach can be applied to multiple system root causes when the investigation team evaluates... 

American Chemistry Council. Resource Guide for Implementing the Process Safety Code of Management Practices. Washington, DC, 1990. 

As previously stated, the American Chemistry Council also recognizes this concept as an integral part of the code of Responsible Care , Process Safety Code of Management Practices, Companies should openly share nonproprietary results from internal process safety incident investigations and related research through the auspices of trade and professional associations, and other networking opportunities. Other organizations should strive to benefit from the lessons learned by others and keep abreast of latest developments and safety alerts. 

Those responsible for the project engineering of such a plant, who often have access to less than 50 % of the information on the chemistry to be performed later due to the reasons mentioned, can come up with only one recommendation if they seriously wish to meet the demand for a design for the worst possible case leave the lid off the reactor. The lack of practicability of this proposal, not least due to the violation of other process safety engineering principles, does not need to be elaborated any further. 

Even before these regulations existed, industry groups, such as the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Center for Chemical Process Safety (AlChE/CCPS), the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), the American Chemistry Council (ACC), and the American Petroleum Institute (API), all promoted pre-startup safety review procedures as a sound management practice which can lead to improved process safety and process reliability. 

The positive side of each summary cause (adequate understanding of the process chemistry and thermochemistry, etc.) is an important aspect of chemical reactivity safety, particularly in facilities where intentional chemistry is practiced. 

Although many mass deacidifications have been developed, it can be stated that none of the technologies offered meets all the criteria. Nevertheless, the DEZ process, Wei T o process, Kopper Process and VPD have demonstrated independently their potential for arresting paper deterioration from acid. To what extent these processes meet the criteria to be used for a practical mass deacidification process is the question that has to be answered. Accordingly, a comparison of the characteristic features of these processes is tabulated in Table I. The evaluation is based on their neutralization chemistry and effectiveness. The engineering design, safety and costs of these processes are not considered in this evaluation. 

Several very useful books on the subject of chemical process development have been published.1 These have been written largely from the point of view of the bench chemist or chemical engineer. Emphasis in this collection of books is on the work needed to ensure that practical chemical reactions are created for scale-up, that the chemistry is understood, that the theory and mechanics needed to engineer scale-up are addressed, and that Safety, Environment and Food and Drug Administration requirements are met. 

---