Chemical potential, thermodynamic-scaling

The smoothing terms have a thermodynamic basis, because they are related to surface gradients in chemical potential, and they are based on linear rate equations. The magnitude of the smoothing terms vary with different powers of a characteristic length, so that at large scales, the EW term should predominate, while at small scales, diffusion becomes important. The literature also contains non-linear models, with terms that may represent the lattice potential or account for step growth or diffusion bias, for example. 

In that way, the thermodynamic approach with the use of conformational term of chemical potential of macromolecules permitted to obtain the expressions for osmotic pressure of semi-diluted and concentrated solutions in more general form than proposed ones in the methods of self-consistent field and scaling. It was shown, that only the osmotic pressure of semi-diluted solutions does not depend on free energy of the macromolecules conformation whereas the contribution of the last one into the osmotic pressure of semi-diluted and concentrated solutions is prelevant. 

If we set at a value of zero according to the conventional chemical thermodynamic energy scale, the standard chemical potential of a hydrated proton,, is given by Eqn. 6-24 ... 

Virtually all chemical reactions in soils are studied as isothermal, isobaric processes. It is for this reason that the measurement of the chemical potentials of soil components involves the prior designation of a set of Standard States that are characterized by selected values of T and P and specific conditions on the phases of matter. Unlike the situation for T and P, however, there is no strictly Ihermodynamic method for determining absolute values of the chemical potential of a substance. The reason for this is that p represents an intrinsic chemical property that, by its very conception, cannot be identified with a universal scale, such as the Kelvin scale for T, which exists regardless of the chemical nature of a substance having the property. Moreover, p cannot usefully be accorded a reference value of zero in the complete absence of a substance, as is the applied pressure, because there is no thermodynamic method for measuring p by virtue of the creation of matter. 

An illustrative result of applying the reduced thermodynamic rushes is the identical scale shifts by the same value Pk in the diagrams of chemical potentials of the catalytic intermediates. 

Also, it is customary to refer all thermodynamic properties to chemical potentials of all species, whether in the pure state or in solution, to their values under standard conditions. In that case the equilibrium constant will be designated, as before, by fCx and the pressure in the above equations is set at P = bar. Finally, it is possible to specify compositions in terms of molarity c, or molality m, leading to the specification of Kc and Km or Kc and Km - The resulting analysis becomes somewhat involved and will not be taken up here interested readers should read Section 3.7 for a full scale analysis of the treatment of nonideal solutions. 

In summary, thermodynamic models of natural water systems require manipulation of chemical potential expressions in which three concentration scales may be involved mole fractions, partial pressures, and molalities. For aqueous solution species, we will use the moial scale for most solutes, with an infinite dilution reference state and a unit molality standard state (of unit activity), l or the case of nonpolar organic solutes, the pure liquid reference and standard states are used. Gaseous species will be described on the partial pressure (atm — bar) scale. Solids will be described using the mole fraction scale. Pure solids (and pure liquids) have jc, = 1, and hence p, = pf. 

Aqueous electrolyte chemical potentials are described on the moial scale. To nlustrate the additional issues that enter into the thermodynamic interpretation of individual ion activity coefficients and chemical potentials and the relation of these to actual electrolyte experimental measurement, we briefly review the properties of the system NaCl(aq), that is, NaCl dissolved in water. [For a detailed discussion, see. e.g., Denbigh, 1971 Hamed and Owen, 1959 Klotz, 1964 Robinson and Stokes, 1959). 

This presents some difficulties. The scale is a set of negative numbers, and it is always more difficult to decide which of two negative numbers is the larger More serious is the conflict with the existing usage of p, as the ordinary thermodynamic chemical potential pY-... 

Finally, there is the problem of finite-size errors, specifically, the results obtained for the (relatively) small, but periodic systems being simulated may not be those found in the thermodynamic limit. This problem is most evident when simulations are performed closed to critical points where fluctuations of macroscopic length scale can be observed [3,26,27]. However, problems can also occur close to phase transitions where the periodicity of the system might stabilize one phase over the other [4]. If possible, some test simulations for smaller and larger system sizes (number of particles) should therefore be carried out to evaluate the finite-size corrections. For the special case of the excess chemical potential, an expression for the leading [ (iV-1)] system-size dependence has been derived [28]. 

Typically, the segregated phase has a smaller characteristic length scale than the continuous phase. In a monomer-flooded emulsion polymerization, the aqueous continuous phase will contain monomer drops and polymer particles, although large monomer drops may also contain smaller water droplets or polymer particles (if crosslinked or insoluble). This is the consequence of a thermodynamic principle that acts in the direction of a constant chemical potential for all species, throughout the whole system. In other words, there is a driving force that pushes all of the components of a system to be present in different proportions in all of its phases. This principle has been proven in spontaneous emulsification experiments, where droplet formation is observed on either side of the liquid-liquid interface [7]. Moreover, the chemical potential is size-dependent at the colloidal scale and hence, particles of different size will possess different compositions. 

Hence, the derivative of the solute chemical potential (or activity) with respect to solute concentration can be expressed in terms of a combination of number densities and particle number fluctuations or KBIs. The ability to express thermodynamic properties in terms of KBIs is the major strength of FST. This has been achieved without approximation and the relationship holds for any stable binary solution at any composition involving any type of components. Derivatives of other chemical potentials can be obtained by application of the GD equation, or by a simple interchange of indices. The same approach can be applied to the second expression in Equation 1.48, with a subsequent application of Equation 1.27, to provide chemical potential derivatives with respect to other concentration scales. 

Where does RT come from The product RT is not deduced from an interaction model but from the thermodynamical analysis of a system that includes thermal energy and not merely physical chemical energy. This subject is treated in Chapter 13 where the identification of the scaling chemical potential with the product/ r is demonstrated. 

In summary, the predictions of analytic PRISM theory [67] for the phase behavior of asymmetric thread polymer Uends display a ly rich dependence on the single chain structural asymn try variables, the interchain attractive potential asymmetries, the ratio of attractive and repulsi interaction potential length scales, a/d, and the thermodynamic state variaUes t) and < ). Moreover, these dependences are intimately coupled, which mathematically arises within the compressible PRISM theory from cross terms between the repulsive (athermal) and attractive potential contributions to the k = 0 direct correlations in the spinodal condition of Eq. (6.6). The nonuniversality and nonadditivity of the consequences of molecular structural and interaction potential asymmetries on phase stability can be viewed as a virtue in the sense that a great variety of phase behaviors are possible by rational chemical structure modification. Finally, the relationship between the analytic thread model predictions and numerical PRISM calculations for more realistic nonzero hard core diameter models remains to be fully established, but preliminary results suggest the thread model predictions are qualitatively reliable for thermal demixing [72,85]. 

In order to calculate the equOibrium composition of a system consisting of one or more phases in equilibrium with an aqueous solution of electrolytes, a review of the basic thermodynamic functions and the conditions of equilibrium is important, This is particularly true inasmuch as the study of aqueous solutions requires consideration of chemical and/or ionic reactions in the aqueous phase as well as a thermodynamic framework which is, for the most part, quite different from those definitions associated with nonelectrolytes. Therefore, in this section we will review the definition of the basic thermodynamic functions, the partial molar quantities, chemical potentials, conditions of equilibrium, activities, activity coefficients, standard states, and composition scales encountered in describing aqueous solutions. 

Because the chemical potential is a thermodynamic property of species i, it must have the same value irrespective of the particular convention chosen for a,. It follows that the value of the standard chemical potential h% and consequently the values of he standard Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constant should depend on that choice. As Hi is the value of Hi for unit activity, the state having such activity in the scale chosen is the standard state. There are lUPAC recommendations for most common situations (Cox et al. 1982). Eor the solutes in the solution phase activities af in all cases collected in Table 5.1, the recommended and commonly anployed Henry law convention is used... 

In this section, we consider vapour-liquid equilibrium in binary fluid mixtures. A locus of vapour-liquid critical points may emanate from the critical point of either component. In the simplest case a single continuous locus of vapour-liquid critical points may connect the critical points of the two components. It is important to consider the thermodynamic behaviour of the mixture at constant chemical potential p.2. On comparing eq 10.57 with eq 10.35, we see that, at constant /I21, the scaling fields become identical to those of a one-component fluid. Hence, the thermodynamic behaviour of mixtures at constant fiji can be described by exactly the same equations as for one-component fluids near the vapour-liquid critical point, except that the critical parameters and the system-dependent coefficients will depend parametrically on the hidden field B2 - Use of p,2 as the hidden field is not convenient, since it diverges in the two one-component limits. This problem is avoided by adopting an alternative hidden field proposed by Leung and Griffiths ... 

---