Chemical potential concentration coefficient

By combining these expressions for defect chemical potentials and coefficients with the relations between the chemical potentials at equilibrium (for example Eqs. (74)) explicit expressions are obtained for the defect concentrations at equilibrium which are quite analogous to the quasi-chemical results (Section IV- A) apart from the presence of the activity coefficients. We consider examples of these equations in later sections. 

Material motion can be driven by a gradient in concentration or pressure or chemical potential. The coefficients mainly used for the three circumstances are D K, and D, as follows. (For K, Kj, and k, see below.)... 

The dielectric constant in this model is concentration dependent and as such contributes to the chemical potential (activity coefficient) of the ions. It is common, however, not to take the derivative of the Bom term with composition as it is seen to introduce large discrepancies between the calculated values and the experimental ones. As shown by O Connell, " these problems typically arise through the inconsistent mixed use of MM and BO-level quantities without paying due attention to the ensembles in which each property is derived. 

For a substance in a given system the chemical potential gi has a definite value however, the standard potentials and activity coefficients have different values in these three equations. Therefore, the selection of a concentration scale in effect determines the standard state. 

The activity coefficient of the solvent remains close to unity up to quite high electrolyte concentrations e.g. the activity coefficient for water in an aqueous solution of 2 m KC1 at 25°C equals y0x = 1.004, while the value for potassium chloride in this solution is y tX = 0.614, indicating a quite large deviation from the ideal behaviour. Thus, the activity coefficient of the solvent is not a suitable characteristic of the real behaviour of solutions of electrolytes. If the deviation from ideal behaviour is to be expressed in terms of quantities connected with the solvent, then the osmotic coefficient is employed. The osmotic pressure of the system is denoted as jz and the hypothetical osmotic pressure of a solution with the same composition that would behave ideally as jt. The equations for the osmotic pressures jt and jt are obtained from the equilibrium condition of the pure solvent and of the solution. Under equilibrium conditions the chemical potential of the pure solvent, which is equal to the standard chemical potential at the pressure p, is equal to the chemical potential of the solvent in the solution under the osmotic pressure jt,... 

The crucial question is at what value of <)> is the attraction high enough to induce phase separation De Hek and Vrij (6) assume that the critical flocculation concentration is equivalent to the phase separation condition defined by the spinodal point. From the pair potential between two hard spheres in a polymer solution they calculate the second virial coefficient B2 for the particles, and derive from the spinodal condition that if B2 = 1/2 (where is the volume fraction of particles in the dispersion) phase separation occurs. For a system in thermodynamic equilibrium, two phases coexist if the chemical potential of the hard spheres is the same in the dispersion and in the floe phase (i.e., the binodal condition). 

All quantities in Eq. (12.6) are measurable The concentrations can be determined by titration, and the combination of chemical potentials in the exponent is the standard Gibbs energy of transfer of the salt, which is measurable, just like the mean ionic activity coefficients, because they refer to an uncharged species. In contrast, the difference in the inner potential is not measurable, and neither are the individual ionic chemical potentials and activity coefficients that appear on the right-hand side of Eq. (12.3). 

The second boundary condition arises from the continuity of chemical potential [44], which implies - under ideally dilute conditions - a fixed ratio, the so-called (Nernst) distribution or partition coefficient, A n, between the concentrations at the adjacent positions of both media ... 

Generally, the activity coefficient y depends on the composition of solution. In the ranges of our narrow purposes of investigations of the macromolecules chemical potential conformation term influence on the osmotic pressure of polymeric solutions we will be neglect by the change of y lying y = const in all range of the macromolecules concentrations into solution. This permits to write... 

Whilst the fundamental driving force for crystallisation, the true thermodynamic supersaturation, is the difference in chemical potential, in practice supersaturation is generally expressed in terms of solution concentrations as given in equations 15.1-15.3. Mullin and Sohnel(19) has presented a method of determining the relationship between concentration-based and activity-based supersaturation by using concentration-dependent activity-coefficients. 

As seen from Eq. (130) an activity coefficient may deviate significantly from unity at higher salt concentrations. The activity coefficient can therefore also be used as a measure of the deviation of the salt solution from a thermodynamically ideal solution. If the chemical potential of a solute in a (pressure-dependent) standard state of infinite dilution is /x°, we find the standard partial molar volume from... 

Although we cannot determine its absolute value, the chemical potential of acomponent of a solution has a value that is independent of the choice of concentration scale and standard state. The standard chemical potential, the activity, and the activity coefficient have values that do depend on the choice of concentration scale and standard state. To complete the definitions we have given, we must define the standard states we wish to use. 

When it comes to the equilibration of water concentration gradients, the relevant transport coefficient is the chemical diffusion coefficient, Dwp. This parameter is related to the self-diffusion coefficient by the thermodynamic factor (see above) if the elementary transport mechanism is assumed to be the same. The hydration isotherm (see Figure 8) directly provides the driving force for chemical water diffusion. Under fuel-cell conditions, i.e., high degrees of hydration, the concentration of water in the membrane may change with only a small variation of the chemical potential of water. In the two-phase region (i.e., water contents of >14 water molecules... 

Upon comparison of eq 32 to 28, it is seen that the proton—water interaction is now taken into account. This interaction is usually not too significant, but it should be taken into account when there is a large gradient in the water (e.g., low humidity or high-current-density conditions). Upon comparison of eq 33 to 31, it is seen that the equations are basically identical where the concentration and diffusion coefficient of water have been substituted for the chemical potential and transport coefficient of water, respectively. Almost all of the models using the above equations make similar substitutions for these variables 15,24,61,62,128... 

Instead of the dilute solution approach above, concentrated solution theory can also be used to model liquid-equilibrated membranes. As done by Weber and Newman, the equations for concentrated solution theory are the same for both the one-phase and two-phase cases (eqs 32 and 33) except that chemical potential is replaced by hydraulic pressure and the transport coefficient is related to the permeability through comparison to Darcy s law. Thus, eq 33 becomes... 

The membrane and diffusion-media modeling equations apply to the same variables in the same phase in the catalyst layer. The rate of evaporation or condensation, eq 39, relates the water concentration in the gas and liquid phases. For the water content and chemical potential in the membrane, various approaches can be used, as discussed in section 4.2. If liquid water exists, a supersaturated isotherm can be used, or the liquid pressure can be assumed to be either continuous or related through a mass-transfer coefficient. If there is only water vapor, an isotherm is used. To relate the reactant and product concentrations, potentials, and currents in the phases within the catalyst layer, kinetic expressions (eqs 12 and 13) are used along with zero values for the divergence of the total current (eq 27). 

This expression arises from Eq. (2.40), noting that the chemical potential pcA must be the same in the phases aq and org for equilibrium to be maintained, and that AtG°(CA,aq org) = pcA,oig - PcA,aq by definition. The approximation is that the activity coefficients of CA are taken to be equal (near unity) at the low concentrations where Eq. (2.64) is valid. 

Significance of Activity Coefficients. While we typically focus our attention on the analytical concentration of reactant(s) and product(s) for a given chemical process, the thermodynamic concept of equilibrium depends on the chemical potential of a species. This is shown by the following relationship... 

From the theoretical point of view, it is necessary to show that no microphysical difference exists between the processes of diffusion, i.e. the transfer of molecules according to a gradient of their chemical potential or concentration, and self-diffusion, i.e. the re-distribution of molecules in space due to their random walk at equilibrium. The corresponding coefficients... 

In these equations is the partial molal free energy (chemical potential) and Vj the partial molal volume. The Mj are the molecular weights, c is the concentration in moles per liter, p is the mass density, and z, is the mole fraction of species i. The D are the multicomponent diffusion coefficients, and the are the multicomponent thermal diffusion coefficients. The first contribution to the mass flux—that due to the concentration gradients—is seen to depend in a complicated way on the chemical potentials of all the components present. It is shown in the next section how this expression reduces to the usual expressions for the mass flux in two-component systems. The pressure diffusion contribution to the mass flux is quite small and has thus far been studied only slightly it is considered in Sec. IV,A,6. The forced diffusion term is important in ionic systems (C3, Chapter 18 K4) if gravity is the only external force, then this term vanishes identically. The thermal diffusion term is impor-... 

Here, p and m are the standard chemical potential and concentration (molal scale) of the /-component (z = 1 for solvent, z = 2 for biopolymer) A2 is the second virial coefficient (in molal scale units of cm /mol, i.e., taking the polymer molar mass into account) and m° is the standard-state molality for the polymer. 

Here, the quantities jn ° and ji are, respectively, the chemical potentials of pure solvent and of the solvent at a certain biopolymer concentration V is the molar volume of the solvent and n is the biopolymer number density, defined as n C/M, where C is the biopolymer concentration (% wt/wt) and M is the number-averaged molar weight of the biopolymer. The second virial coefficient has (weight-scale) units of cm mol g. Hence, the more positive the second virial coefficient, the larger is the osmotic pressure in the bulk of the biopolymer solution. This has consequences for the fluctuations in the biopolymer concentration in solution, which affects the solubility of the biopolymer in the solvent, and also the stability of colloidal systems, as will be discussed later on in this chapter. 

---